******* Cowboys Official Season Thread 2024 *******

132,462 Views | 1905 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Tksymm7
FightinFarrier18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tksymm7 said:

I don't disagree with not being active at the deadline rn. The players that we have and would actually bring value in return for a trade can be traded in the offseason or closer to the draft.
I tend to agree with you here. I think this season is a wash at this point with the number of holes that need to be filled, and a winning season/playoff appearance probably means McCarthy keeps his job
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgsWin2011 said:

All in the dumpster.
fify
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tksymm7 said:

I don't disagree with not being active at the deadline rn. The players that we have and would actually bring value in return for a trade can be traded in the offseason or closer to the draft.
One, they are too stupid to realize that.

Two, Stephen would just get fleeced in the trade (like giving away Amari for a sixth, whom Buffalo just traded a third for).
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mac is gone because the new coach will be what Jerry sells next season. Ben Johnson treated the Lion game like an interview.
Demosthenes81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would you trade Micah to Detroit for a First Round pick? First and Second?

Seven and three are ten, not only now, but forever. There has never been a time when seven and three were not ten, nor will there ever be a time when they are not ten. Therefore, I have said that the truth of number is incorruptible and common to all who think. — St. Augustine
Tksymm7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Poot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Ben Johnson had options at all, which he has and he does and he will… why in the world would he coach for Jerrah? Seriously
Orlando Ayala Cant Read
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Poot said:

If Ben Johnson had options at all, which he has and he does and he will… why in the world would he coach for Jerrah? Seriously


If I believed in myself as a coach with a vert bright future no way would I take the Cowboys job. Just too many culture issues to overcome and ownership that won't spend money to add new needs pieces
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think you have to consider it. Other than taking over for Andy Reid after he leaves what is another job that would look more appealing? Bengals, Patriots and Seahawks might be better spots to land. I think the Bills would be a tie with their cap situation.

I would rather have to work with Dak over Lawrence, Daniel Jones, Anthony Richardson, Dalton, Rodgers, Levis, Vegas QB situation, Nix.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poot said:

If Ben Johnson had options at all, which he has and he does and he will… why in the world would he coach for Jerrah? Seriously
because very few of the options will have a QB and WR already in place.

eagles & bengals are the only potential openings with those pieces already on the team.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YUP!!!!!

I've said it I don't know how many times... Dak came in as a rookie and knew how to play NFL QB right away. That is EXTREMELY rare.

There are a few things that you can point to that are the BIG problems for this team and DAK is NOT one of them. Dak is one of reasons we are .500 and not winless right now.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jr15aggie said:

YUP!!!!!

I've said it I don't know how many times... Dak came in as a rookie and knew how to play NFL QB right away. That is EXTREMELY rare.

There are a few things that you can point to that are the BIG problems for this team and DAK is NOT one of them. Dak is one of reasons we are .500 and not winless right now.


Agree.

Also, if you listened to Aikman on w the musers this morning, he flat out said the WRs are poor route runners. He called out the WRs, big time.
Tksymm7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jr15aggie said:

YUP!!!!!

I've said it I don't know how many times... Dak came in as a rookie and knew how to play NFL QB right away. That is EXTREMELY rare.

There are a few things that you can point to that are the BIG problems for this team and DAK is NOT one of them. Dak is one of reasons we are .500 and not winless right now.
Dak is not one of the issues with this team, and I don't think anyone would really argue otherwise. As was stated above there are much bigger problems at the moment. However, what we have seen so far this season does reinforce that he is not an elevator of players around him, and instead tells us that he needs a really good run game and offensive line to be successful.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tksymm7 said:

jr15aggie said:

YUP!!!!!

I've said it I don't know how many times... Dak came in as a rookie and knew how to play NFL QB right away. That is EXTREMELY rare.

There are a few things that you can point to that are the BIG problems for this team and DAK is NOT one of them. Dak is one of reasons we are .500 and not winless right now.
Dak is not one of the issues with this team, and I don't think anyone would really argue otherwise. As was stated above there are much bigger problems at the moment. However, what we have seen so far this season does reinforce that he is not an elevator of players around him, and instead tells us that he needs a really good run game and offensive line to be successful.

I actually would take some issue with this. Dallas has had some WRs experience some success with Dak. I think some of these guys can thank Dak for helping them financially:

Gallup - 3rd Round pick - $57m contract (only got about 23)
Ced Wilson - 5th Round pick - $22m contract
Noah Brown - 7th Round Pick - has had a solid career
Cole Beasley - UFA - $29m deal when he left
Terrance Williams - 3rd Round pick - $17m

That's pretty darn good return on those guys especially considering where they were drafted.
FightinFarrier18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FightinFarrier18 said:


This is my shocked face -_-
No matter what!
Epstein didn't do, you know, the thing...
I'm the rare Astros/Cowboys/Spurs fan. We do exist
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FightinFarrier18 said:


and to me, that all comes down to culture....which is all the jones family cartoon cowboys bs and fat mike. we're a joke of a franchise.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I generally think if the QB and the WR make a different read on the defense, its almost always the WRs mistake.
Dak is not a perfect QB, but hes easily good enough to win it all if the rest of the team is there. Im not sure I believe he can play well enough to outweight weaknessess elsewhere enough throughout the course of the season and playoffs anymore, though.

You dont have to have Mahomes to win a super bowl, and its not like he is playing with bums either.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PatAg said:

I generally think if the QB and the WR make a different read on the defense, its almost always the WRs mistake.
Dak is not a perfect QB, but hes easily good enough to win it all if the rest of the team is there. Im not sure I believe he can play well enough to outweight weaknessess elsewhere enough throughout the course of the season and playoffs anymore, though.

You dont have to have Mahomes to win a super bowl, and its not like he is playing with bums either.

I tend to agree. Say what you will about Dak, he historically, has a pretty low rate of turnovers. He doesn't have elite physical tools so he's had to live on making smart choices and being very accurate compared to the scouting report on him coming out of college.

When he came out, he wasn't considered a great passer of the football. He's worked his butt off and become a very good NFL QB.

Also, Romo made the comment (as have other QBs) that once he really felt he was mastering the position of QB from a mental standpoint, was when his body gave out and didn't allow him to do the job physically. In general, QBs just get so much better at the mental part of the game, so I agree with your first point that Dak should get the benefit of the doubt on situations like that.
Tksymm7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What Dak needs more than anything is a solid o line and an effective run game. He's not built to drop back and throw the ball 35+ times. He's got an average arm, and at times isn't all that accurate with the football, and needs easier throws.

On top of that, when your WR room only has one good player in it, but they are all loafing around, its a recipe for some really poor ball on offense.

Someone above said it best; the Cowboys have a really poor culture from ownership on down, and there needs to be a major reset at the top and accountability throughout.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tksymm7 said:

What Dak needs more than anything is a solid o line and an effective run game. He's not built to drop back and throw the ball 35+ times. He's got an average arm, and at times isn't all that accurate with the football, and needs easier throws.

On top of that, when your WR room only has one good player in it, but they are all loafing around, its a recipe for some really poor ball on offense.

Someone above said it best; the Cowboys have a really poor culture from ownership on down, and there needs to be a major reset at the top and accountability throughout.
agree.

One of the Detroit DBs was on the radio this week and basically said CD is the only weapon Dak has. Once they take him out, they have zero worry about the rest of the guys.

I do think the best thing they could do is try to get a RB w some explosiveness. There are some folks online that do the All 22 study that say the Dallas OL has been better at run blocking than the numbers would indicate. They just don't have anyone at RB w juice to make something happen.
Tksymm7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They need to start by dropping Zeke like a bag of rocks and give Dowdle all of the snaps until further notice.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree.

The only role Zeke could help the roster is in short yardage, but frankly, I think Luepke is better so he's just a wasted roster spot right now.
Woods Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tksymm7 said:

What Dak needs more than anything is a solid o line and an effective run game. He's not built to drop back and throw the ball 35+ times. He's got an average arm, and at times isn't all that accurate with the football, and needs easier throws.

On top of that, when your WR room only has one good player in it, but they are all loafing around, its a recipe for some really poor ball on offense.

Someone above said it best; the Cowboys have a really poor culture from ownership on down, and there needs to be a major reset at the top and accountability throughout.
Agree on all points.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That rep officially moves Tolbert to the bust category. And their only weapon is a moody guy that takes plays off.
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tksymm7 said:

What Dak needs more than anything is a solid o line and an effective run game.
So does every QB worth a damn.
No matter what!
Epstein didn't do, you know, the thing...
I'm the rare Astros/Cowboys/Spurs fan. We do exist
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dak's not the reason they are getting smoked, but he's the reason they can't improve the roster. Dak is a $40MM quarterback that they are paying $60MM. He doesn't elevate other players, he's the opposite, he needs help to produce.
Spaceship
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agristotle said:

Dak's not the reason they are getting smoked, but he's the reason they can't improve the roster. Dak is a $40MM quarterback that they are paying $60MM. He doesn't elevate other players, he's the opposite, he needs help to produce.
This is very well said, but if they wanted to keep Dak, they had to pay him what they did. They were forced to either keep Dak, or blow things up and get a rookie QB or journeyman QB, but in neither case is the rest of their roster good enough to support it.
Tksymm7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll push back here. The best of the best QBs can work with mediocre to average o line play. Josh Allen's line has been average for years; Mahomes line has been average at best for a bit now; Rogers had lines that were beat to hell and he still performed at MVP levels. Now, those are the elite of the elite, and I'll concede that no one can produce behind a BAD offensive lines, but it can be done behind mid offensive line play.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Spaceship said:

Agristotle said:

Dak's not the reason they are getting smoked, but he's the reason they can't improve the roster. Dak is a $40MM quarterback that they are paying $60MM. He doesn't elevate other players, he's the opposite, he needs help to produce.
This is very well said, but if they wanted to keep Dak, they had to pay him what they did. They were forced to either keep Dak, or blow things up and get a rookie QB or journeyman QB, but in neither case is the rest of their roster good enough to support it.
Bull.

That's letting the front office off the hook. They have over $20m in cap space right now. Had they done the Dak and CD deal sooner like everyone knew they had to, they could have had plenty of cap space to add to this roster.

The 'Dallas can't do this because of the salary cap' is such a wrong headed take.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tksymm7 said:

I'll push back here. The best of the best QBs can work with mediocre to average o line play. Josh Allen's line has been average for years; Mahomes line has been average at best for a bit now; Rogers had lines that were beat to hell and he still performed at MVP levels. Now, those are the elite of the elite, and I'll concede that no one can produce behind a BAD offensive lines, but it can be done behind mid offensive line play.
Mid- OL would be an improvement. They are in the bottom 10 of pass blocking.
Tksymm7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh I agree, we are bad on the o line.
Spaceship
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Macarthur said:

Spaceship said:

Agristotle said:

Dak's not the reason they are getting smoked, but he's the reason they can't improve the roster. Dak is a $40MM quarterback that they are paying $60MM. He doesn't elevate other players, he's the opposite, he needs help to produce.
This is very well said, but if they wanted to keep Dak, they had to pay him what they did. They were forced to either keep Dak, or blow things up and get a rookie QB or journeyman QB, but in neither case is the rest of their roster good enough to support it.
Bull.

That's letting the front office off the hook. They have over $20m in cap space right now. Had they done the Dak and CD deal sooner like everyone knew they had to, they could have had plenty of cap space to add to this roster.

The 'Dallas can't do this because of the salary cap' is such a wrong headed take.
We're saying the same thing in different ways. The front office drug their feet on Dak to the point where they either had to pay him $60M or $0, and combining that with general poor management of the rest of their roster, they've created the current situation on the field. I'm not letting the front office off the hook - its the opposite.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok, I'd just like to point out that even with the mismanagement of those contract negotiations, they STILL have room to make moves, if they really wanted to.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.