cbr said:

---

1) 'critics' are usually paid shills or hollywood insiders, i assume?
2) why do you think the public ratings are not honest? Do they bot or otherwise rig them?

---

AggieUSMC said:

---

Am I the only one who thought episode 3 was just boring and pointless?

I get why the Hollywood left are fawning over it but it didn't advance the plot in any way. Zombie apocalypse shows are supposed to be about murder and mayhem not post apocalyptic Brokeback Mountain.

---

DallasTeleAg said:

---

Madmarttigan said:

---

Yeah it's kind of why I'm annoyed I just want to know if a show is good so I usually followed public reviews but now even those are being ruined.

---

I mean... I get it and agree with you. But realistically, do you think those people who rated it that way because of those reasons wouldn't just wait until the day it was released and then rate it the same?

You can call it a rating bomb, but it's a direct reaction to the material of the show/movie/etc. The fact is Hollywood has been very loud about what they want to do, and that agenda is directly opposed by at least 20-30% of this country.

---

DallasTeleAg said:

---

FL_Ag1998 said:

---

DallasTeleAg said:

---

Madmarttigan said:

---

Yeah it's kind of why I'm annoyed I just want to know if a show is good so I usually followed public reviews but now even those are being ruined.

---

I mean... I get it and agree with you. But realistically, do you think those people who rated it that way because of those reasons wouldn't just wait until the day it was released and then rate it the same?

You can call it a rating bomb, but it's a direct reaction to the material of the show/movie/etc. The fact is Hollywood has been very loud about what they want to do, and that agenda is directly opposed by at least 20-30% of this country.

---

This particular case is not rating the overall show, its rating each particular episode. So your argument is that because people disliked episode 3 its perfectly logical and OK for them to pre-emptively rate episode 4 extremely low? Without having seen it and solely as a reaction to episode 3?

That makes no sense.

Review bombing of an episode you haven't seen simply because you disliked the overtones of the previous episode is juvenile.

---

Funny you mention logic in a response that makes a logical leap in reasoning from my statement.

You could say my posts says it's logical for people to dislike the episode due to the agenda. I never said it was "ok". But then saying something is "OK" would require defining what "ok" means in this situation. Someone has the right to rate an episode based on any criteria they choose, unless you were to display the criteria these rankings are requesting the viewers use to rate it, and then make an argument the reviewer did not follow those criteria.

It makes absolute sense. But you don't want to be logical, you just want to virtue signal and just argue with me, though I said nothing controversial.

---

DallasTeleAg said:

---

Madmarttigan said:

---

Na you're being an argumentative dumbass. Rating a show you haven't seen makes absolutely no sense.

---

Lol... I literally said I agree with you but to complain about ratings before something comes out is silly because the exact same people would most likely rate it the same after the airing.

Some of yall are just so quick to want to jump on anyone who doesn't celebrate what yall celebrate. Yall are incapable of having a real conversation.

---

DallasTeleAg said:

---

FL_Ag1998 said:

---

DallasTeleAg said:

---

Madmarttigan said:

---

Yeah it's kind of why I'm annoyed I just want to know if a show is good so I usually followed public reviews but now even those are being ruined.

---

I mean... I get it and agree with you. But realistically, do you think those people who rated it that way because of those reasons wouldn't just wait until the day it was released and then rate it the same?

You can call it a rating bomb, but it's a direct reaction to the material of the show/movie/etc. The fact is Hollywood has been very loud about what they want to do, and that agenda is directly opposed by at least 20-30% of this country.

---

This particular case is not rating the overall show, its rating each particular episode. So your argument is that because people disliked episode 3 its perfectly logical and OK for them to pre-emptively rate episode 4 extremely low? Without having seen it and solely as a reaction to episode 3?

That makes no sense.

Review bombing of an episode you haven't seen simply because you disliked the overtones of the previous episode is juvenile.

---

Funny you mention logic in a response that makes a logical leap in reasoning from my statement.

You could say my posts says it's logical for people to dislike the episode due to the agenda. I never said it was "ok". But then saying something is "OK" would require defining what "ok" means in this situation. Someone has the right to rate an episode based on any criteria they choose, unless you were to display the criteria these rankings are requesting the viewers use to rate it, and then make an argument the reviewer did not follow those criteria.

It makes absolute sense. But you don't want to be logical, you just want to virtue signal and just argue with me, though I said nothing controversial.

---

DallasTeleAg said:

---

So surprised some of yall graduated from college without understanding basic logic. And all Madmarttigan could do was fall back to ad hominem, as most of you do.

---

Quote:

---

And all Madmarttigan could do was fall back to ad hominem, as most of you do.[

---

Ol Jock 99 said:

---

Is it showtime yet?

---