*** SW: The Last Jedi - FULL SPOILERS BE IN HERE ***

359,735 Views | 3129 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Definitely Not A Cop
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
02skiag said:

letters at random said:

wesag said:

Damage control gentlemen. It's like blaming the woman accuser to change the story.

That's not true. There is very good evidence that the audience score at Rotten Tomatoes was manipulated. There is also an independent polling company that has released their results for TLJ, and they are within the margin of error identical to TFA.

It's clear some nerds are trying to manipulate public opinion.


Here's how we'll know: watch the box office. People vote with their money. This movie will get a second screening out of me.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/robcain/2017/12/20/rotten-tomatoes-confirms-its-55-last-jedi-audience-score-is-100-authentic/amp/

It's real. Between Rian's connections and the movie's in your face social messages it's no surprise Hollywood had favorable reviews.
I may be wrong but I believe a film critic's job is to look at films on individual basis and minimize looking a the film as part of an overall story.
7nine
VanZandt92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBQ-00 said:

What's funny in my circle of friends ranging from super fan to social Star Wars fan, the results reflect the exit polls. Most really liked it. Even if there were parts they did not care for.


I think lots of folks will see the movie again just to decide what they think.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:


I frankly think this is nonsense and much of this thread, as well.

I think folks have deified the original trilogy for the purposes of hating this. The originals had silly holes, also. That critique about Luke going away is a dumb argument. Did Luke not have to go find Yoda as he was living as a hermit on a swamp planet?

I think this whole deal is emblematic of what's wrong with our social media society today.

I don't think this movie is perfect, but it's damn good. And probably 3rd best, at worst, within the cannon.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm guessing the last paragraph of that didn't click with you yet.
7nine
letters at random
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twilly said:

One of the things that gave me pause was Luke and his desire to kill his nephew. I get the hermit/curmudgeon/elderly crisis thing he's turned into, but why a killer? What motivated him to want to kill Ben? That's straight up dark side right there. And that's what cleared it up for me.


He didn't desire to kill his nephew. He reached into Ben's mind as Ben slept and saw how dark he had become, how much death and pain he would inflict on the universe, and for a moment was afraid and reacted to stop the future that he saw. But it was passing. He was not going to kill Ben, but Ben awoke while Luke's saber was still ignited. I thought this was clearly explained.
02skiag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

In your face social messages? In The Last Jedi?


Indeed! They weren't all "in your face" like Canto but they were there.
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

In your face social messages? In The Last Jedi?

I'm not sure anything was "in your face", but consider that of three total white male characters, Ren is an evil bad guy and Poe spent most of the movie as Leia and Holdo's punching bag. Plus the randomly inserted commentary on wealthy people and arms dealers.

Most relevant, several actors involved in the project plus Johnson have commented about intentional feminist messages and diversity goals which I think got a lot of people on high alert for that sort of thing. Personally, I didn't feel like there was much to complain about but I can see why people looking for something to complain about were able to find it.
Flashdiaz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twilly said:

Put me in the group that has misgivings about this film. I've seen it 4 times and while an entertaining film, I didn't think it advanced the entire saga as good as it should. I'm a big SW fan, will always be a big SW fan, and this movie alone can't destroy how I feel about the saga. To steal a line, TLJ just gave me a bad feeling about this.

The movie is definitely making me work harder to like it than I planned. Let me give an example....

One of the things that gave me pause was Luke and his desire to kill his nephew. I get the hermit/curmudgeon/elderly crisis thing he's turned into, but why a killer? What motivated him to want to kill Ben? That's straight up dark side right there. And that's what cleared it up for me.

Going back to the duel in ROTJ, Luke doesn't want to kill his father, he want's to save him. I'm sure Luke, when first seeing Ben's darkness, felt the same thing. Only after Vader directly threatens Leia, does Luke violently swing to the dark. I even can see similarities in Luke's lightsaber and facial expressions when comparing the two scenes (standing over Ben vs. repeatedly striking Vader while he's off his feet). In TLJ, we only hear subtle clues as to Ben's darkness.

This is where I think the movie needed a little more to ram home the darkness that Luke felt. For instance, maybe a couple of verbal "Ben! NO!!!" from Han or Leia as they are being hurt. Something that is a direct threat to something held dear by Luke. If something like that was in TLJ and I missed it, feel free to correct.

In ROTJ, after Vader's hand is lost, there is the visual of Luke's charred mechanical hand that gives him pause before he becomes just as evil as dear ol' dad. I think Rian tried to give us a similar visual with Luke holding his unlit lightsaber over Ben, but it didn't ring the same. (Was it a glove of mechanical hand? Guess I have to go back and see it again unless you guys can remind me.) A simple Vader's breath here could have made this a complete connection and made a key moment so much more powerful, and believable.

As has been pointed out quite a bit on this thread, there are just little things like this that could have gave this movie a greater connection/feeling to the previous films, but at the same time allowed it to go in a different direction.

" I even can see similarities in Luke's lightsaber and facial expressions when comparing the two scenes (standing over Ben vs. repeatedly striking Vader while he's off his feet). In TLJ, we only hear subtle clues as to Ben's darkness. "

exactly, we've seen Luke go to the Darkside if only temporarily. In ROTJ, he did so for a couple seconds, enough to defeat Vader. In TLJ, he had a quick lapse then caught himself. I do see what you're saying though, just a few more audio cues could have driven that point home. They did have some sounds (lightsaber, laser blasts, I don't remember), but they could have included sounds from Kylo killing Han as a cue for example. This vision alone would certainly have Luke question if this kid is salvageable... a red lightsaber going through his father would be a powerful image for Luke to ignore.


And let's not forget when Luke talks to Leia in TLJ, he says he cannot save him and his own mother agrees!
VanZandt92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
02skiag said:

TCTTS said:

In your face social messages? In The Last Jedi?


Indeed! They weren't all "in your face" like Canto but they were there.


I guess I missed the in your face of Canto. What was it?
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I even can see similarities in Luke's lightsaber and facial expressions when comparing the two scenes (standing over Ben vs. repeatedly striking Vader while he's off his feet).

Good catch! I knew there was something about that scene that I was missing but couldn't figure out what.
letters at random
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you hate obvious social commentary, you must despise the original Star Trek.


I'm a conservative guy, but the casino thing didn't bother me at all. That was an essential part of the movie. It's the essence of the rebellion. It's a populist message, sure, but so what? Who would deny that powerful people often oppress and mistreat folks less power? The major ongoing tension of Star Wars is about proper use of power.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VanZandt92 said:

I think lots of folks will see the movie again just to decide what they think.


That's my plan.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

In your face social messages? In The Last Jedi?
I have to say, the overcorrection of putting more women in command than men was a bit annoying. I recall several scenes where you could see nothing but women in the Rebel command rooms. That coupled with just ignoring the fact that men are always going to be stronger than women, yet have Rey somehow able to manhandle men in combat is also annoying.

I'm fine with more women and more minority actors. I'm fine with no white men even. But sexes will always be a universal thing in the human race. If you want to make a majority women command force, at least make them a different species where it's plausible that genetically they are more suited for military command.
7nine
twilly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
letters at random said:

twilly said:

One of the things that gave me pause was Luke and his desire to kill his nephew. I get the hermit/curmudgeon/elderly crisis thing he's turned into, but why a killer? What motivated him to want to kill Ben? That's straight up dark side right there. And that's what cleared it up for me.


He didn't desire to kill his nephew. He reached into Ben's mind as Ben slept and saw how dark he had become, how much death and pain he would inflict on the universe, and for a moment was afraid and reacted to stop the future that he saw. But it was passing. He was not going to kill Ben, but Ben awoke while Luke's saber was still ignited. I thought this was clearly explained.
It's not as clear as you make it, or was explained in the movie.

Luke's path was one of failure and redemption. I'm saying his failure with Ben was glossed over and needed to be fleshed out ever so slightly more to give it the gravitas it needed.

He ignited his lightsaber, which showed intent to harm, even if only for a brief moment. What drove him to ignite? (fear, anger, hate, losing something?) Then he walked back from the edge of the cliff? Why?

All I'm getting at is as you explained it, and how it was presented on screen didn't effectively show the depth of despair at the moment. Luke's motivation and reaction to it are pretty pivotal in this movie and I don't think the director illustrated it as good as he could.
02skiag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
letters at random said:

If you hate obvious social commentary, you must despise the original Star Trek.


I'm a conservative guy, but the casino thing didn't bother me at all. That was an essential part of the movie. It's the essence of the rebellion. It's a populist message, sure, but so what? Who would deny that powerful people often oppress and mistreat folks less power? The major ongoing tension of Star Wars is about proper use of power.


The over the top feminism message as someone previously posted is what bothered me. What they did with Poe's character was annoying. All the lead males get taught a lesson by the female leads.

I'm all about girl power, don't get me wrong! I love that Rey is the lead and don't mind at all that she is a prodigy with the force. I have a daughter and I like that message for her. I want her to believe that we are all equal though, not that men are all testosterone filled poor decision makers.

That's only a small part of my problems with this film, I'm just explaining my comment about Hollywood and social message. Hollywood has a clear male problem right now if you've been watching the news.
hurleyag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ulrich said:

I still think OP Rey will be explained in 9

That is what we thought about 8 also. I'm not expecting any more from her origins.
InnerCityAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiephoenix02 said:

SeattleAgJr said:

except leia and han would have commented on their lost daughter (fi that is what you are implying). that would be too late of a story bomb to drop.
Yep.

Why do people want her to have special parents? Rey is special enough in her own right, and that's the point. She is an amazing person without needing to be royalty or a Senator's daughter or have Jedi blood...


Then they need to justify this by dropping her midichlorian count in IX.
VanZandt92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hurleyag said:

Ulrich said:

I still think OP Rey will be explained in 9

That is what we thought about 8 also. I'm not expecting any more from her origins.


I don't care who her parents are. That's an old Star Wars them that is getting worn out
Quad Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

But sexes will always be a universal thing in the human race. If you want to make a majority women command force, at least make them a different species where it's plausible that genetically they are more suited for military command.
Are you implying that homo sapien women are genetically not suited for military command? Because that's what I read in your comment.

If y'all think The Last Jedi had strong feminism message or whatever, then grow up. Whatever messages in the movie were not strong or hurt you in any way. If they wanted to make some statement, they could have done a lot more than put women in command. Any leader would have dressed down Poe for the way he was acting.
02skiag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quad Dog said:

Quote:

But sexes will always be a universal thing in the human race. If you want to make a majority women command force, at least make them a different species where it's plausible that genetically they are more suited for military command.
Are you implying that homo sapien women are genetically not suited for military command? Because that's what I read in your comment.

If y'all think The Last Jedi had strong feminism message or whatever, then grow up. Whatever messages in the movie were not strong or hurt you in any way. If they wanted to make some statement, they could have done a lot more than put women in command. Any leader would have dressed down Poe for the way he was acting.


That's not the point. They created that situation intentionally with the purpose of it being a female in command. It's annoying, why do you have a problem that people are annoyed and are expressing that? We paid good money for entertainment and after watching TFA we got a bait and switch with this movie.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
what is ironic is that while i think the intent was a rampant feminist message, the actual plot showed that neither leia and especially not that purple haired character were fit to command. at all.

which really pisses me off, as leia in the early movies was pretty solid.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quad Dog said:

Quote:

But sexes will always be a universal thing in the human race. If you want to make a majority women command force, at least make them a different species where it's plausible that genetically they are more suited for military command.
Are you implying that homo sapien women are genetically not suited for military command? Because that's what I read in your comment.

If y'all think The Last Jedi had strong feminism message or whatever, then grow up. Whatever messages in the movie were not strong or hurt you in any way. If they wanted to make some statement, they could have done a lot more than put women in command. Any leader would have dressed down Poe for the way he was acting.
Individually there are plenty of women that are. Statistically, more men are. It's a product of genetic differences. As I said, having women in charge isn't the problem. Having more women in charge than men in an army is just silly.
7nine
Forum Troll
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just got out. How did this film get 93% on rotten tomatoes? So much to read and catch up on.
FTACO97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Forum Troll said:

Just got out. How did this film get 93% on rotten tomatoes? So much to read and catch up on.
Name checks out...
SeattleAgJr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forum Troll said:

Just got out. How did this film get 93% on rotten tomatoes? So much to read and catch up on.
TLJ is like an ogre.

Meaning it is like an onion.

It has layers.

OR some bull**** like that.
americathegreat1492
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The hero archetype always has some sort of unique or divine origin. If their origin isn't, they become touched by something divine that changes them. Anyway, they have pretty significantly deviated from the hero archetype with Rey, which imo is one of the reasons a lot of people either hate her character or find her uninteresting.
Ulrich
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quad Dog said:

Quote:

But sexes will always be a universal thing in the human race. If you want to make a majority women command force, at least make them a different species where it's plausible that genetically they are more suited for military command.
Are you implying that homo sapien women are genetically not suited for military command? Because that's what I read in your comment.

If y'all think The Last Jedi had strong feminism message or whatever, then grow up. Whatever messages in the movie were not strong or hurt you in any way. If they wanted to make some statement, they could have done a lot more than put women in command. Any leader would have dressed down Poe for the way he was acting.

I thought he was saying that to have a mostly female command staff, it would probably be a species where the women are tactical geniuses. Among humans, mental abilities are fairly even while self-selection leads to more military men than women, making a mostly female command staff improbable.


I don't care much about this, but that's how I interpreted his statement.
wesag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
americathegreat1492 said:

The hero archetype always has some sort of unique or divine origin. If their origin isn't, they become touched by something divine that changes them. Anyway, they have pretty significantly deviated from the hero archetype with Rey, which imo is one of the reasons a lot of people either hate her character or find her uninteresting.


No. The hero doesn't need divine origin.
redd38
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Forum Troll said:

Just got out. How did this film get 93% on rotten tomatoes? So much to read and catch up on.


This is a bad time to be pissing off the mouse

?quality=0.8
Forum Troll
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So I haven't had time to read any articles or anything yet, but like I said earlier I'm not sure why this got such univeral praise. I just got out of the theater around 130pm so I haven't thought things over for multiple days or anything.

The Finn/Rose story line goes absolutely nowhere and was like 35 to 40% of the movie.

The Resistance/First Order story line seems really odd since the Resistance now conists of 20 people and the Millenium Falcon.

The Luke/Rey/Ben storyline is exciting but didn't seem to move forward very much. If Rey's parents end up being nobodies, it will be very disappointing. Snoke dies way too early in this trilogy for someone that plays such a big role in turning Ben. Hopefully there will be more flashback scenes.

Loved Yoda's appearance.

I guess Luke was too weak and just becomes a force ghost after projecting himself on Crait?

Captain Phasam = Boba Fett. Thanks for that Disney.

Seems like Disney also had a built in female quota as well. I get trying to have more females in Star Wars since the OT only had Leia but felt like they over did it this time around.

Oh and Superman Leia. That was odd really out of place. There was literally no precedent for that. Her only force powers to this point have been talking to Luke and feeling the pain of far away dying loved ones.

I don't think this movie should have gotten really poor scores or anything, but it's a far cry from ESB and doesn't seem worthy of a 90%+ score. The overall story in TFA had a lot of "retreads" from the OT but it seemed to move along at a decent pace. This story didn't accomplish much at all and it seems like there is a lot of work left for Episode 9.

Maybe I'll feel better after a second viewing.
VanZandt92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forum Troll said:

Just got out. How did this film get 93% on rotten tomatoes? So much to read and catch up on.


Like when my son pokes a fire ant bed.
americathegreat1492
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wesag said:

americathegreat1492 said:

The hero archetype always has some sort of unique or divine origin.If their origin isn't, they become touched by something divine that changes them. Anyway, they have pretty significantly deviated from the hero archetype with Rey, which imo is one of the reasons a lot of people either hate her character or find her uninteresting.


No. The hero doesn't need divine origin.


Try again.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm beginning to think the Resistance is just a bunch of whackadoodles. The church of scientology could probably muster up more support.
AggieSportsGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there anything more to address about this movie that hasn't already been addressed? Seems like this thread has jumped the shark.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
too bad fans cant vote a do over.
the prequels were a pretty decent story, if filmed properly where they didnt look like bad cartoons and werent full of jar jar bull**** and horrible acting.
this movie is filmed pretty well, but an absolutely INCREDIBLY ****ty story.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.