Is it just me or does Tom Cruise seem like such a freakin cool guy and such an incredible weirdo all at the same time? As a kid in the 80's I grew up on Cruise movies. To this day I still don't know what to think of the guy, not that it matters.
Very cool. But $400K? Classic government spending.aTmAg said:Honestly, it wasn't that obvious to me. Tom Cruise is famous for doing his own stunts. Such as getting a gazillion hours in a helicopter for one of the mission impossible movies. Here is some background info on why I thought the notion of Tom Cruise getting to fly an F-35 needed correcting:TCTTS said:
I blocked him. But now that I can see what he wrote... really? Examples like this are why so many people dislike aTm. My post was clearly tongue in cheek. I don't actually believe that they'd let Cruise land fighter jets on aircraft carriers.
He was at my work a month or so ago supposedly getting fitted for a F-35 helmet (which cost $400K each):
(BTW, that's his own P-51)
And here is a picture of the pricey helmet:
Those helmets are custom fit for each pilot and are necessary because the F-35 has this thing where it projects stuff onto the glass in your helmet while you fly. Imagine a virtual reality thing you wear as you fly and you can look down and not see your legs, plane, or anything but see the ground underneath you. That's what the F-35 does. For it to work right, the helmet has to fit just right, snug, and not move at all.
People at my work were wondering why the hell were they going through that level of expense for a movie when there is absolutely no way that a causal observer would be able to tell "that symbol on his visor is off by half an inch!" That the only (not gratuitous) reason they would actually go through that expense would be if he were to fly the thing himself. He did get to fly in jets for the first Top Gun, after all.
I'm just saying, that for anybody who may think he will be flying in an F-35 for this movie like he flew in F-14's in the last one (and because he has a gazillion of flight hours in various aircraft), I'm saying that there is no way.
double aught said:Very cool. But $400K? Classic government spending.aTmAg said:Honestly, it wasn't that obvious to me. Tom Cruise is famous for doing his own stunts. Such as getting a gazillion hours in a helicopter for one of the mission impossible movies. Here is some background info on why I thought the notion of Tom Cruise getting to fly an F-35 needed correcting:TCTTS said:
I blocked him. But now that I can see what he wrote... really? Examples like this are why so many people dislike aTm. My post was clearly tongue in cheek. I don't actually believe that they'd let Cruise land fighter jets on aircraft carriers.
He was at my work a month or so ago supposedly getting fitted for a F-35 helmet (which cost $400K each):
(BTW, that's his own P-51)
And here is a picture of the pricey helmet:
Those helmets are custom fit for each pilot and are necessary because the F-35 has this thing where it projects stuff onto the glass in your helmet while you fly. Imagine a virtual reality thing you wear as you fly and you can look down and not see your legs, plane, or anything but see the ground underneath you. That's what the F-35 does. For it to work right, the helmet has to fit just right, snug, and not move at all.
People at my work were wondering why the hell were they going through that level of expense for a movie when there is absolutely no way that a causal observer would be able to tell "that symbol on his visor is off by half an inch!" That the only (not gratuitous) reason they would actually go through that expense would be if he were to fly the thing himself. He did get to fly in jets for the first Top Gun, after all.
I'm just saying, that for anybody who may think he will be flying in an F-35 for this movie like he flew in F-14's in the last one (and because he has a gazillion of flight hours in various aircraft), I'm saying that there is no way.
Yeah I don't get the guy. He seems like a nice and normal dude, but then there is the whole Scientology thing. Is Scientology keeping the shady aspects of it secret from him? I know Scientologists go out of their way to ignore anti-Scientology "propaganda" so I imagine he has never seen Going Clear or that Leah Remini show. Leah insists that he knows everything and is actually the devil, but it's hard to see that.Urban Ag said:
Is it just me or does Tom Cruise seem like such a freakin cool guy and such an incredible weirdo all at the same time? As a kid in the 80's I grew up on Cruise movies. To this day I still don't know what to think of the guy, not that it matters.
I believe they are built by Rockwell Collins.AgGrad99 said:
Out of curiosity, are these Elbit Systems' helmets?
aTmAg said:Honestly, it wasn't that obvious to me. Tom Cruise is famous for doing his own stunts. Such as getting a gazillion hours in a helicopter for one of the mission impossible movies. Here is some background info on why I thought the notion of Tom Cruise getting to fly an F-35 needed correcting:TCTTS said:
I blocked him. But now that I can see what he wrote... really? Examples like this are why so many people dislike aTm. My post was clearly tongue in cheek. I don't actually believe that they'd let Cruise land fighter jets on aircraft carriers.
He was at my work a month or so ago supposedly getting fitted for a F-35 helmet (which cost $400K each):
(BTW, that's his own P-51)
And here is a picture of the pricey helmet:
Those helmets are custom fit for each pilot and are necessary because the F-35 has this thing where it projects stuff onto the glass in your helmet while you fly. Imagine a virtual reality thing you wear as you fly and you can look down and not see your legs, plane, or anything but see the ground underneath you. That's what the F-35 does. For it to work right, the helmet has to fit just right, snug, and not move at all.
People at my work were wondering why the hell were they going through that level of expense for a movie when there is absolutely no way that a causal observer would be able to tell "that symbol on his visor is off by half an inch!" That the only (not gratuitous) reason they would actually go through that expense would be if he were to fly the thing himself. He did get to fly in jets for the first Top Gun, after all.
I'm just saying, that for anybody who may think he will be flying in an F-35 for this movie like he flew in F-14's in the last one (and because he has a gazillion of flight hours in various aircraft), I'm saying that there is no way.
He seems like a standup guy, and a truly dedicated professional. Also seems like a total weirdo and not someone I would like to personally know.Urban Ag said:
Is it just me or does Tom Cruise seem like such a freakin cool guy and such an incredible weirdo all at the same time? As a kid in the 80's I grew up on Cruise movies. To this day I still don't know what to think of the guy, not that it matters.
I can only assume this is for a flashback scene or something, because a Tomcat would be utterly useless in 2019.Jbar1998 said:
FYI
. http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26505/an-f-14-tomcat-has-returned-to-the-deck-of-an-operational-carrier-for-top-gun-2-production
TCTTS said:
Loggins is indeed coming back, I just don't know to what capacity.
Perhaps, but this movie is going to be pure nostalgia for me and my wife. We can still quote almost all the lines from the film. I was lucky enough to meet two of the Naval Aviators that flew in that movie (I still have the coke can he gave me when he stepped out of the bird). Seeing the Turkey will bring back the feels from that time and I will like it.A. Solzhenitsyn said:I can only assume this is for a flashback scene or something, because a Tomcat would be utterly useless in 2019.Jbar1998 said:
FYI
. http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26505/an-f-14-tomcat-has-returned-to-the-deck-of-an-operational-carrier-for-top-gun-2-production
AgStuckinLBK said:TCTTS said:
Loggins is indeed coming back, I just don't know to what capacity.
At the very least, I hope there's a bar scene, where H. Jon Benjamin is singing Karaoke "Danger Zone" poorly in the background. Tom Cruise is being talked about coming back. After a couple of seconds, Tom Cruise says something like "let's do it" cut scene to him driving his motorcycle or flying a jet and then Loggins seamlessly continues "Danger Zone" now blaring so loudly it causes ear drums to burst
wow...that's honestly shocking to me and might be the first time i've read or seen anybody describe an encounter with him negativelywangus12 said:
Only thing I've heard recently from my uncle who used to serve on the USS TR is that Cruise has been an absolute ******* to the crew stationed on the carrier