*** TOP GUN : Maverick ***

301,571 Views | 2251 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by YNWA_AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Give me "You've Lost that Loving Feeling" and "Take My Breath Away" all day long. I don't care who knows it. I love that stuff just as much as everything else. Probably in part because of my sister, who grew up loving the movie because of those McGinnis aspects, and I think that rubbed off on me a bit.

The love story is thin, no doubt, but I don't think it sucks. Not by a long shot. Maverick is banging his instructor. It's not only baller, but creates a legitimately interesting dynamic, one you don't see depicted often. That, and every bit of it is worth it for the callback at the end when she plays "You've Lost that Loving Feeling" on the jukebox and surprises him. Yes, it's cheesy, but it's also one of my all time favorite final scenes. It's juts so iconic.
UnderoosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I couldn't believe YLTLF isn't on the soundtrack.

And I still have the original 1986 vintage cassette of that bad boy at home someplace.
Hey Nav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Top Gun was an unbelievably bad movie. The dialogue is some of the most comical drivel I have ever sat through.

Top Gun 2 will be even more incredible, I predict.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's absolutely iconic of the time. 1986 was halfway through Reagan's second term. American's were optimistic and unafraid about the future. The US military had been re-built into the most technologically advanced war machine in history. Patriotism was on high. Top Gun played to all of this with just the right amount of classic 60's musical nostalgia. America wanted this movie.
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
















Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
to each their own, I stand by my sentiments. I don't recall anyone disliking Top Gun other than a few naval officers that couldn't find a good time if it sat on their face (disclaimer, I grew up with a lot of Navy families).
Hey Nav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, the Naval Aviators hated the movie, because it was Laurel & Hardy comedy. It was fun to heckle them.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are two kinds of Americans, those who like Top Gun and liars.
UnderoosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oofdah. So maybe there is something to Scientology.




Negative Ghostrider, the religion is stupid.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hey Nav said:

Top Gun was an unbelievably bad movie. The dialogue is some of the most comical drivel I have ever sat through.

Top Gun 2 will be even more incredible, I predict.
I feel the need
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

Hey Nav said:

Top Gun was an unbelievably bad movie. The dialogue is some of the most comical drivel I have ever sat through.

Top Gun 2 will be even more incredible, I predict.
I feel the need
Right after that, they show an F-14 hauling ass. I could never put my finger on what about that shot make it look like it's going so fast. It's not going supersonic and the video is not particularly shaky or anything (the typical technique). I can find plenty of videos of planes going faster, but something about that shot makes it appear that is the fastest plane ever.
Pahdz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:

I've never seen it.


Explains so much
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So some history...

My Dad was a pilot during Vietnam. This movie was the first movie him and I ever watched together in the theater. I was 7. Forget my age, it was the 80s and this movie was relevant, it was awesome.

Tonight I watched it for the first time with my oldest... She's 14 and she loved it. Got a little teary eyed at the end when the Righteous Brothers sang and the credits rolled. Great night! Great movie!
42799862
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Remedy that.
You KNOW it's gonna be on loop on TBS, TNT, FXX, etc. right about the time the new one comes out.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So we're getting the synthwave or bro country version.
Sex Panther
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mother ****er... it'll be Imagine Dragons just watch
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ha, that's EXACTLY who I was thinking. Though, since Kosinski has such a good ear (Daft Punk/Tron Legacy and M83/Oblivion), I'm hoping he'll at least steer it to a decent, non-terrible collaboration.
PaulSimonsGhost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I served in the Navy (Sea Bees) and NCOs like the film just fine I thought.

Amongst officers it was mixed. Aviators and Flight Officers definitely don't care fore it. Either because they're not fighter pilots and secretly feel slighted or because they ARE fighter pilots and don't care for the inaccuracies.


But the Department of the Navy gave full access to the film to use it as a recruiting tool. It was great PR.


It will be interesting to see what they do with the script as fighter pilots are no longer pure fighter pilots, they're more bomber pilots, or "Fighter/Attack" designated (hence F/A-18).


Dropping laser guided bombs on truck depots doesn't quite get the nipples hard like shooting down Russians will.


I would also be interested to see if they use the Super Hornet or our new F-35 squadrons. The DoD took a huge beating getting the F-35 made and now it's here it could use the positive press.



Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting.

Steve McQueen
PaulSimonsGhost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also the F-14 Tomcat was phased out a long way back. The RIO or Radar Intercept Officer is obsolete.
That means no Goose, no Slider, no Merlin. The relationship and banter between pilot and RIO was a major part of that movie.





Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting.

Steve McQueen
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've always wondered something about the end of the first movie...

How accurate is it that a bunch of guys who JUST graduated from Top Gun are called into action like that? Yes, it's ridiculous that it happens at their graduation, but I can forgive that as a movie contrivance/necessity. I'm wondering more about the overall pecking order. Like, why aren't pilots who are more experienced and graduated from Top Gun, say, three years ago, tending to the crisis at the end? Why do they ask a group of Top Gun rookies instead? I'm assuming that's just another movie contrivance, but I was wondering if there was any truth/accuracy to that, like fresh graduates are considered better because they've more recently been through intense training or something.

On that same note, can someone explain what "level" of pilot Maverick & co are in the opening sequence, at the beginning of the movie? Like, do those guys actually engage enemies as well or is that just a Top Gun thing? Also, is it accurate that Stinger would be in command of them at the beginning, and then also again at the end, after they've made it through Top Gun? Or is that yet another movie contrivance?

I know next to nothing about the Navy or fighter pilots or how any of that works and TexAgs seems fairly knowledgeable in these matters. I've always been somewhat curious, so I thought I'd ask.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's absolutely 100% something that would never have happened. The whole point of having the fleet deployed is that they are the first line of defense. That carrier already had a bunch of Top Gun grads on it, they didn't need to fly in three more.

Unless of course it was Iceman, Slider, and Maverick and you needed to finish out a Hollywood blockbuster strong kicking some red commie ass. Then it makes perfect sense.

Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The F/A-18F has a pilot and a weapon systems officer. The -18E is single seat.
Hey Nav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The movie is totally 100% accurate in that regard., as was all the dialogue. It's as if an actual Naval Aviator was the screenwriter.

But mostly, the crews picked to lead the big missions were based on a pecking order ranked by cool hair styling and gel application.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gotcha. And yeah, I have a copy of the script and it's insanely detailed and reads as incredibly knowledgeable.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It might be a skewed sample, but I work with pilots (including one who flew SR-71s) and they are not at all like the cocky dudes in Top Gun. They are also engineers though, so they are more like Neil Armstrong and less like Chuck Yeagar.


I worry that I will not like this movie because I work for defense contractor on the F-35. I know a whole lot more about this stuff then I did back then. I'm afraid I will not be able to suspend disbelief enough and might nit-pick this movie to death.
Hey Nav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A few films that I think are more realistic (although still "Hollywood") are :

Flight of the Intruders



and The Great Santini



Heck, Hank Hill rented Santini 18 times

Then, if you want to watch an incredible film dealing with military leadership, it's 12 O'Clock High.
PaulSimonsGhost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I've always wondered something about the end of the first movie...

How accurate is it that a bunch of guys who JUST graduated from Top Gun are called into action like that? Yes, it's ridiculous that it happens at their graduation, but I can forgive that as a movie contrivance/necessity. I'm wondering more about the overall pecking order. Like, why aren't pilots who are more experienced and graduated from Top Gun, say, three years ago, tending to the crisis at the end? Why do they ask a group of Top Gun rookies instead? I'm assuming that's just another movie contrivance, but I was wondering if there was any truth/accuracy to that, like fresh graduates are considered better because they've more recently been through intense training or something.

On that same note, can someone explain what "level" of pilot Maverick & co are in the opening sequence, at the beginning of the movie? Like, do those guys actually engage enemies as well or is that just a Top Gun thing? Also, is it accurate that Stinger would be in command of them at the beginning, and then also again at the end, after they've made it through Top Gun? Or is that yet another movie contrivance?

I know next to nothing about the Navy or fighter pilots or how any of that works and TexAgs seems fairly knowledgeable in these matters. I've always been somewhat curious, so I thought I'd ask.


From what I understand amongst those guys I know who were in the aviation community (an important distinction they make because "The Air Force has pilots; they land on runways. Naval Aviators land on carriers") there was a lot of little things they'd never do and a few big things.

Top Gun first of all has no trophy. Advanced training is tough enough. While flyers are very competitive amongst each other you just want to graduate.

Also once a guy gets back to his squadron they're responsible for teaching what he/she learned to everyone else. I can't imagine Mavrick being pulled mid deployment to go to advanced training.

Yes, the scene where they get their orders at graduation was just sexy writing. You would go with whoever was deployed closet.

For example NavDevGru or "Seal Team 6" had a squadron already rotated back to Little Creek from Iraq so they were chosen for Bin Laden. Could have just as easily been CAG (Combat Applications Group or "Delta Force" if you will).

What else? Stinger was (my guess) the CO of the CAG or Carrier Air Group. There's the ship's Captain and then there's the CAG who commands all the ship's aircraft squadons. If he was still deployed on Enterprise he could be CAG CO in the beginning and end.

Oh, and buzzing the tower once gets you court martial so that irks the tailhookers, too.

Truth is the Navy wanted this as a recruiting film. You show me an honest recruiter I'll show yow a guy not meeting his quota and being reassigned.
Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting.

Steve McQueen
PaulSimonsGhost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You are correct, Sir.
Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting.

Steve McQueen
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hear you. Who knows how it'll come across in the movie, but the director and writer have been granted full access by the military or Navy or whoever and have been working hand-in-hand with them to develop the script and get things as accurate as possible.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

I worry that I will not like this movie because I work for defense contractor on the F-35. I know a whole lot more about this stuff then I did back then. I'm afraid I will not be able to suspend disbelief enough and might nit-pick this movie to death.
That must suck. I work in medicine and most of the **** they put on tv/film is wrong
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AlphaCharlieUniformAggie said:



Oh, and buzzing the tower once gets you court martial so that irks the tailhookers, too.
I hear that barrel-roll immediately after launch would most likely get you shot down by your own guys as well.
PaulSimonsGhost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

The F/A-18F has a pilot and a weapon systems officer. The -18E is single seat.


You're right, I think. I believe the Marines used back seaters in there hornets, too. But aren t those specifically attack designation? Marines do go to Top Gun but they're primary role is air support.


It wasn't my community honestly. But I heard some things and wanted to contribute to the thread.


Edit: Checked and it's the Australians who use the 2 seaters.
Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting.

Steve McQueen
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wangus12 said:

aTmAg said:

I worry that I will not like this movie because I work for defense contractor on the F-35. I know a whole lot more about this stuff then I did back then. I'm afraid I will not be able to suspend disbelief enough and might nit-pick this movie to death.
That must suck. I work in medicine and most of the **** they put on tv/film is wrong


Except for Scrubs
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.