ChiliBeans said:
Look, I don't think going to someone's apartment is an automatic invitation to digital penetration. If he did what she described, it's beyond sleezy and she had good reasons for being upset.
My problem is with the anonymous sourcing. This opens the door for click-hungry websites to publish real name fiction. Sure, tabloids have done something like that for years, but there's a huge difference when discussing behavior that can ruin a career and potentially lead to criminal investigations.
It's not. But considering he already went down on her, she'd somewhat reciprocated, then continued to stick around while waxing poetic about the wine she wasn't a fan of, I have a hard time taking her account as total fact.
The fact that the two of them seemed to have reaching an understanding via text also raises a lot of questions for me. She says she told all of her girlfriends about this right after it happened. Yet a year later they decide it's a good time for publicity since he's on tv and it's a chance to make waves?