The XSi also uses SD cards. So when you grow and decide to get a bigger/better camera, you have to buy all new memory.
quote:
I'll say it, since no one else will: A DSLR with a 1.8'' LCD is trash. Sorry. I have a point and shoot with a bigger screen. That's a make or break thing.
That's pretty ignorant.
No one would choose a Rebel over a 1D mark II.
I wonder how big the LCD was on the back of Robert Capa or Henri Cartier-Breeson's Leicas.
Ansel Adams must have had a huge LCD for those pics he took.
I wonder how many test shots Joe Rosenthal took to make sure everything was right when he took the Iwo Jima pic.
We could always go do a shoot out. You could use your rebel with your 3.0" LCD, and I could use my camera with gaffers tape over the LCD and see which camera works better.
quote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe flash sync has nothing to do with recycle time. It has to do with the time between flash and shutter, and how closely it can be aligned.
This is correct. And if you are worried about the on camera flash recycle time, you probably aren't too concerned with quality.
quote:
Either way, it's obvious you haven't compared the specs, and sounds like you haven't used a body with sensor cleaning, or you'd appreciate a feature like that a little more. Sure, it doesn't do the whole job, but it helps a hell of a lot more than nothing at all.
That's pretty ridiculous.
I started out shooting film, developing it myself and scanning in the negs.
I've been a professional photographer since before automatic sensor cleaning was invented. I understand the benefits. It is nice to have, but it is unnecessary.
If you are paying ~4-500 more for a camera body that is quickly depreciating instead of buying better lenses which retain value or actually INCREASE in value to start a hobby, that may not be the best decision.
[This message has been edited by Guitarsoup (edited 5/24/2009 9:14a).]