Thanks, this is helpful

idk if it's by design, but I'm pretty sure RTG 2 star option is bugged. Not getting any SP for ranking up and still a 67 OVR QB2 in year 3.

Dumb complaint, but I wish they hadn't used the same system for changing helmets and face masks as Madden. Maybe I'm missing something, but choosing the helmet style and then having to scroll through every facemask style for every helmet to change that is annoying.

Played this morning and started a dynasty with the Ags.

Is this just a dynasty thing or did they change our home field advantage ranking to no. 5? That's what it was when playing ND.

SIAM.

I really like the game. Just wish they had a standard option that had the regular coaches in it and you could play a standard season.

Also not sure how the road to CFP works. I already have two losses. Will it reset after the 12 games or so that you play and you do it again?

very impressed with this game so far.

Can you only play 1 team in a dynasty at a time? My daughter goes to Oklahoma State and I wanted to do a season and play with both the Ags and Pokes. I guess that was only for a season not a dynasty, right?

I think the game is outstanding and much more realistic than '14 ( I know it's to be expected). Control over the players movement is really good. Passing is going to take some getting used to as it feels more difficult to see the full field and movement post snap and the reads have to be very quick to time passes correctly. But again, I think that is very realistic.

You need to make some pre snap decisions and you need to time your throws correctly on routes. Throw too late on an out route and it's going to get picked. Throw too early on a crossing route and the linebacker is taking it. I agree that it feels like my mistakes when I throw an interception and not a freak play. I also dont mind that the defense catches it so much because the picks I have thrown have basically been straight to the defender.

Running the ball is much more fun and it feels like a variety of run plays can work.

Kicking is way harder, but again college kickers are not reliable.

Jerseys look much better in the game than I expected and I don't notice the ATM helmet decal being too small as much as I thought I would during the game. It is annoying though because all the animations outside of the game have the appropriate decal.

Band and corps look great to me and I'm glad they got that detail correct.

I'm really impressed with everything related to the game at this point.

BackwardsInBoots said:

---

Absolutely nothing to do with gameplay, but Reveille's fur texture is hot garbage.

---

Haha! I was saying this same thing last night!

Reading online that the sim engine is totally busted - hopefully this is just a small vocal minority or it will be patched soon but apparently FCS teams are regularly beating top 25 teams and many top teams are starting off the year losing a lot. Also, sim stats are unrealistic (low). Haven't been able to play yet but curious if anyone on here who has been able to get halfway or so through a dynasty is seeing this.

joshpettett said:

---

For some reason they have us playing a red, white, and blue game against Notre Dame.

---

Is this not customizable? Like, did it default to this and you could've changed it to a normal crowd or did you not have an option?

Notre Dame was ranked 8th and I (the Aggies) beat them like 49-0. I just figured it was because I have it on easy mode.

That was the default season opener for me in Dynasty mode as well.

Imma need a tutorial on how to run the RPO

I missed my first PAT and then got taken into OT by Notre Dame as a result. The game is too realistic.

MW03 said:

---

Imma need a tutorial on how to run the RPO

---

Play the mini games. They really do help so much

MW03 said:

---

Imma need a tutorial on how to run the RPO all the things.

---

FIFY.
I suck at this game right now. I guess that's what happens when the last football game you played was NCAA 2006.

Confirming the A&M playbook sucks. I switched to Ole Miss. I need to add more under center formations to it but it is much better. The run plays are all some variation of zones from shotgun though. I had success running the option. Still trying to learn read option and haven't attempted an RPO yet.

The WR screens actually work in this game now. Maybe too good.

Re: A&M's playbook sucking, makes you wonder what they did for programs with first year coaches and/or coordinators. Did they just look at what Klein did at KSU last year, or Elko at Duke?

tmaggie50 said:

---

Confirming the A&M playbook sucks. I switched to Ole Miss. I need to add more under center formations to it but it is much better. The run plays are all some variation of zones from shotgun though. I had success running the option. Still trying to learn read option and haven't attempted an RPO yet.

The WR screens actually work in this game now. Maybe too good.

---

Unfortunately HB screens now seem badly broken.
The HB always runs into the G or T and takes too much time to slide off them.

I've tried several times, hoping that it was due to defensive play calls, but I have not found it possible to run a HB screen from under center against a P5 team.
I have successfully completed a shotgun screen, but only about 10% of the time, due to the HB not getting past the linemen until I'm getting hit.

Maybe I missed it from someone else but we have male cheerleaders for road games.

For those that say A&M's playbook sucks, what is it you think is bad about it?

Quincey P. Morris said:

---

Maybe I missed it from someone else but we have male cheerleaders for road games.

---

We had male and female cheerleaders during a home game in one of the games I played.

Gig em G said:

---

For those that say A&M's playbook sucks, what is it you think is bad about it?

---

It is extremely generic and run heavy, which isn't a bad thing as running is much easier than passing BUT the pass play options in the A&M playbook are pretty bad.

On my year one A&M dynasty for some reason EJ Smith gets more pt than Owens, Moss or Daniels despite being 4th string. Definitely some interesting kinks to work out.

I have noticed the same with mine. It is frustrating.

I want to run a 1 - 2 punch with Owens and Moss but can't figure out how to set it up unless I make a coaching change on depth chart during the game.

You have to go to the Microsoft store and "purchase" the trial

i was playing online with a friend and cause bad teams. Colorado st has a pretty good palybook. Ole Miss is too exotic for me

joshpettett said:

---

tmaggie50 said:

---

Confirming the A&M playbook sucks. I switched to Ole Miss. I need to add more under center formations to it but it is much better. The run plays are all some variation of zones from shotgun though. I had success running the option. Still trying to learn read option and haven't attempted an RPO yet.

The WR screens actually work in this game now. Maybe too good.

---

Unfortunately HB screens now seem badly broken.
The HB always runs into the G or T and takes too much time to slide off them.

I've tried several times, hoping that it was due to defensive play calls, but I have not found it possible to run a HB screen from under center against a P5 team.
I have successfully completed a shotgun screen, but only about 10% of the time, due to the HB not getting past the linemen until I'm getting hit.

---

I've never tried under center hb screen because I never trust I'll get time to throw. I've had some good success using shotgun hb screens. The times it hasn't worked is because I'm hit too quickly.

AgShaun00 said:

---

i was playing online with a friend and cause bad teams. Colorado st has a pretty good palybook. Ole Miss is too exotic for me

---

I thought Ole Miss playbook is fairly simple. Passing concepts are easy to process in play. Levels crossing routes or complimentary twin routes with post and out routes or corner and out route concepts.

The slot fade route works really well against man coverage barring what type of safety coverage they are running.