quote:
Harden/Howard/Deng being a more dangerous lineup is so laughably wrong. Like almost 1st grade level wrong.
Harden/Howard/Deng plus Beverley, Jones, Motiejunas, Daniels, and a decent shot at grabbing someone like Bledsoe and/or a FA post vs Harden/Howard/Parsons/Bosh and whatever trash they can pick up off the street for the league min. I don't think you get out of the west without at least one good player off the bench, especially when your big three is not as good as OKC's big three. If the Rockets had Harden and Howard and no Parsons and their first move had been to bring Deng aboard, you guys would have been over the moon and predicting a title for him just like you were about adding Howard to Harden and Parsons last year. Deng is at least as good as Parsons, you're just bent out of shape because your first choice fell through.
I think Ryan is on the right track. The Rockets need to get their team together and get some continuity going. That was never going to happen with Bosh, Parsons, and trash, but it can with Deng and a set of nice role players. Houston is not trying to get out of the lottery here, they just need to add a little more defense and build on their year to year improvement and keep developing those young guys.
quote:
And its hilarious you liked the Rockets because of Battier and Chuck ****ing Hayes. Yeah man, I was a huge Lakers fan until they went astray from the Divac/Van Axel line of thought.
I said I liked them, not that I bet on them to win a title. It was an easy team to root for. Harden and Howard, not so much.