Sophie Cunningham

145,801 Views | 1053 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by ts5641
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Backyard Gator said:

jagsdad said:

Backyard Gator said:



You know, you can say what you want about her skills or views, but the one thing you can't say is that this silly goofball just enjoys the dickens out of life. Says what she believes, doesn't back down, and stands by her friends. That seems like a winning combination for life.

She basically went from "no one effs with my big sister" growing up to "Caitlin is my little sister, no one will touch her" in the WNBA.

Add that to the fact that she just loves life and people, and radiates that joy every day, and you have an incredibly likable and marketable celebrity.


Nothing the other side hates more than - likeable, lovable, beautiful, successful, happy people.

Their idea or equality is everyone is equally miserable.
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

The WNBA is actively destroying itself.

Caitlin Clark drops a triple-double… and they hide her from the media because of race-based attacks.

Her own coach Stephanie White admits she's "not educated enough" to say biological men don't belong in women's sports.

Says she doesn't believe in exclusion.

Sophie Cunningham speaks up for female athletes and gets booed.

Her teammates walk out of a press conference rather than answer questions about it.

Minnesota's coach is out here saying "separate is not equal" and "trans lives matter."

Let's be clear:

The WNBA only exists because they separated men and women.

That's the entire reason the league was created.
Now they're so desperate to virtue signal that they're willing to kill the golden goose.

Clark and Cunningham are the only reason anyone is watching… and the league treats them like problems.

You're either a sports league or an activism group.
Pick one.


CC and Sophie Cunningham show what happens when you interrupt an activism group with an actual basketball game.
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can someone tell these people what the W in the wnba stand for? Or why the league was even created in the first place?
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sophie getting booed in all these left wing hell hole cities for saying men shouldn't compete against women in sports...what a fing country
slatermikan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actually watching the Indiana/Minnesota game right now and commenting to my son that it's one of the best, most enjoyable women's games I've watched. Ball movement, shot making until..
They made it to a 3rd quarter timeout before highlighting the shirt that the Minnesota coach was wearing. Even in their best moments they can't let the game speak for itself.

Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
slatermikan said:

Actually watching the Indiana/Minnesota game right now and commenting to my son that it's one of the best, most enjoyable women's games I've watched. Ball movement, shot making until..
They made it to a 3rd quarter timeout before highlighting the shirt that the Minnesota coach was wearing. Even in their best moments they can't let the game speak for itself.



That t-shirt is an example of weaponized mental illness.

for those not watching, she's wearing a shirt that says 'trans kids belong'

Again, this is an activism group masquerading as a basketball league

Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a girl in boys sports which is not the same as she not saying she's a boy.
Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just the cites
slatermikan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Backyard Gator said:

slatermikan said:

Actually watching the Indiana/Minnesota game right now and commenting to my son that it's one of the best, most enjoyable women's games I've watched. Ball movement, shot making until..
They made it to a 3rd quarter timeout before highlighting the shirt that the Minnesota coach was wearing. Even in their best moments they can't let the game speak for itself.



That t-shirt is an example of weaponized mental illness.

for those not watching, she's wearing a shirt that says 'trans kids belong'

Again, this is an activism group masquerading as a basketball league



and the somber tone the announcers took when telling everyone they should listen to the interview with the coach was comical in it's gravitas.
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think they need some trans players in the league. I am sure the vast majority of the left wing activists masquerading as basketball players would have no issues getting, ahem, man-handled on the court...
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Men are allowed to participate on WNBA teams as a practice squad, but cannot be part of the official roster.

It's part of the CBA, but don't tell that woke activists (wactivists?) that.

Per AI:

Quote:

why are men not allowed to tryout for a spot on the official team roster?


Men are barred from competing for spots on official WNBA team rosters because the league is legally and operationally defined as a protected single-sex category designed specifically for female athletes. [1]
The restriction is maintained through several foundational principles:

Biological Sex and Athletic Equity
  • Physiological Differences: Segregating sports by biological sex accounts for natural physiological disparitiessuch as average differences in bone density, muscle mass, and circulating testosterone. If men were permitted to compete directly for the same limited roster spots, it would fundamentally compromise competitive fairness and dilute the intended purpose of the league. [1, 2]
  • Preserving Opportunity: The WNBA operates with incredibly tight constraints, allowing just 12 player rosters per team. Restricting these scarce, elite professional spots to women ensures that female basketball players have an exclusive pathway to earn a living playing professional sports at the highest level in North America. [1, 2]
Legal and Contractual Frameworks
  • The Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA): Roster eligibility guidelines are collectively negotiated between the league and the Women's National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA). These frameworks dictate the exact employment terms and player standards, keeping the official competitive positions strictly allocated to female athletes. [1, 2]
  • Title IX and Single-Sex Exemptions: While the WNBA is a private professional entity rather than an educational institution bound by Title IX, the legal landscape in the United States widely recognizes and protects single-sex athletic leagues. Courts have historically upheld the legality of sex-segregated sports categories to promote and protect athletic opportunities for women. [1, 2]


Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2000AgPhD said:

I think they need some trans players in the league. I am sure the vast majority of the left wing activists masquerading as basketball players would have no issues getting, ahem, man-handled on the court...

Been wondering why this hasn't happened already. My god it would be hilarious to see some 6'5", 210 lb", freaks trucking these women.

After they spit out a few teeth, they might start to know how Clark feels.

BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Check out this "defensive foul". You can straight up elbow a defenders face and the call goes in your favor. League is run by incompetent women top to bottom.

The refs are almost as bad as the judges are in Minnesota. Defensive foul, no hostile act occurred. Shameful. You dont even have to know the rules of basketball to know that was a horse **** call. And look at the **** eating grin on the ref.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Backyard Gator said:


Quote:

The WNBA is actively destroying itself.

Caitlin Clark drops a triple-double… and they hide her from the media because of race-based attacks.

Her own coach Stephanie White admits she's "not educated enough" to say biological men don't belong in women's sports.





OMG.... if you actually listen to that coach she also says something to the effect that she played against boys "all the time".

Yeah I'm sure she did.

I played basketball A LOT - from grade school until high school, then college rec leagues and pickup games at East Kyle all through college, and then corporate leagues as well as the local pickup game on Saturday morning with all the other dads for years and years. I didn't stop playing until I was about 45 and my knees were shot.

And yes, invariably in those pickup games there would be a woman who would play sometimes. Or even an occasional rec league game. And nobody minded and some of them were pretty good.

But let me tell you how it went when a woman played. You put your worst defender on her and that guy knew he was to back off on her. Let her shoot, let her dribble, don't swat her **** or steal the ball from her. Just play soft defense and stay in front of her. We took it easy on her and just did not let her beat you to the rim. You never bodied up on them or muscled them. You never harassed them or got in their face to even close out those passing lanes. And you didn't even take the opportunity to leave her unguarded and double someone else because that was not sportsmanlike to the other 4 guys playing with her. The only time you might play any tough defense was if it came down to the end and you needed it to win. Then she might get her **** blocked or the ball stripped or stuffed at the rim. She wasn't making a shot when it mattered.

So thats what this coach played against and she probably thought she hung with the boys because for 95% of any game she did what she wanted and maybe hit some shots and never had a turnover until the end maybe. So she thought she did good.

Yeah. Because they let you. Any team of 5 half decent guys could usually crush a team of 4 guys and girl if they wanted to (unless the other 4 were just significantly more talented than your 5). It would literally almost be a 5 on 4 game if they wanted to make it that way. Because you could slack off her double anyone else good or in position and still recover to guard her if she popped open or cut to the rim and stop her 90% of the time. It was not even a close matchup really with average pickup level guys and any girl even if they played competitively.

Everyone who played pickup basketball has probably seen this. And I'm sure I don't remember every game but I cannot ever remember being beaten by a team with a girl, nor winning when we had the girl. One person made that much difference.

Now imagine that advantage extended to say 2 or 3 biological males on a squad of 5. They would dominate and it would not be close. Upper high school level or average college level biological male players would crush anyone in that league.

If they actually did openly invite trans to play it would kill the league. Everyone would scramble for the few players breaking the barrier, dominate the league and everyone else would then protest. Then a flood of trans would come in and take over and there would not be a single biological female left - maybe they could make a rule that they had to keep ONE per team.

Screw them. Let 'em do it. Watch it destroy the league it would be hysterical. Since I really don't care (have never watched a WNBA game - but I have seen "highlights").
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JK Rowling points out who the Concerned Moderates here are siding with against Sophie Cunningham.

AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chase128
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pisses me off they label her as anti trans when she's really pro women
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chase128 said:

Pisses me off they label her as anti trans when she's really pro SANITY


FIFY

This is 100% what it boils down to.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chase128 said:

Pisses me off they label her as anti trans when she's really pro women


Kinda like anti-abortion instead of pro life.

They use labels the way they want and intentionally.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:




Should have been a flagrant foul on the Lynx player. It was an obvious elbow to the face. Lucky it didn't break her jaw or eye socket if it was a little higher.

The WNBA is just another poorly run leftist political association. When they don't get what they want or feel in any way threatened, they resort to violence.

Enrico Pallazzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FIBA has an actual video out illustrating this as an offensive foul. Hmmm.

Hill08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Give these participants bicycles to ride to games while cc gets 25M a year in Europe and Sophie makes 50M a year on podcasts and OF. They'll all be at McD's shortly…..including Monica mc my own nuts
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Enrico Pallazzo said:

FIBA has an actual video out illustrating this as an offensive foul. Hmmm.



At least the top image has some sort of forward momentum by the offensive player and has the plausible explanation that the contact was incidental and not on purpose.

In the bottom picture, and how she received the pass and moved her arms, she 100% intended to make contact with Cunningham; yet "no hostile act occurred".

Women are poor judges of facts, even in front of their eyes, when there is any sort of emotion involved. No wonder no one watches this horse-**** product.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The WNBA is just carrying on the same traditions that made me quit watching the NBA a long time ago. When the refs change how they officiate the game based on who has the basketball, it isn't a sport anymore. They might as well bring in olympic ice dancing judges to score each shot instead of actually counting how many go through the hoop. I like Sophie and CC, but there is no way I am going to sit down and watch a WNBA game because of how the league has clearly told their refs to turn a blind eye towards violence against certain players. It is no different than the referee in a WWE match theatrically turning his back when somebody climbs over the ropes carrying a folding chair.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm against men in women's sports, with the exception of the WNBA. Bring 'em on. Oh that's right (if the earlier poster is correct) their own rules don't allow that. So they are fine with dudes taking the roster spots of all of the levels of female basketball players in JH, HS and college, but not the pros. Interesting.

Oh and the two rock stars should quit and play in Europe since everyone is recommending it. WNBA would go back to the dead league it was.

It's hard to comprehend how stupid this whole thing is.
I don't think you know me.
AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seriously, just put a couple 6'10" 250 lb post players in there and let them get a 50 points and 20 boards. Shut them up real fast.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I concur and the result would be entirely predictable, even if they restrictednit to me less than 6' tall.

The Williams sisters were stupid enough to brag that they could beat any male tennis player outside the top 200. Then #204 took the challenge and schooled both of them.


ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AxelFoley85 said:

Seriously, just put a couple 6'10" 250 lb post players in there and let them get a 50 points and 20 boards. Shut them up real fast.

This needs to happen. Just put a giant bruiser in there who doesn't care how much he hurts them. Just ****ing crush and embarrass them.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the WNBA has these controversies by design. Nobody paid any attention to them for 25 years until they started this
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Squadron7 said:

JK Rowling points out who the Concerned Moderates here are siding with against Sophie Cunningham.



Nightmare fuel. Kill it with fire.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The USWNT team lost against an U-15 boys team, 5-2 in 2017.
The Swiss Women's national team lost against an U-15 boys team, 7-1.

Swimming WR's tell the story. There is no physical interaction between competitors.
50M Freestyle (long course) WR: Men's: 20.33 s, Women's: 23.55 s
1500M Freestyle WR: Mens: 14 min 30.67 s, Womens 15 min 20.48 s

There is no comparison between men and women when it comes to athletics.
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90 said:

I concur and the result would be entirely predictable, even if they restrictednit to me less than 6' tall.

The Williams sisters were stupid enough to brag that they could beat any male tennis player outside the top 200. Then #204 took the challenge and schooled both of them.




A LITTLE nuance to this... This was before Serena really developed as a player. Still, she wouldn't have been close with him.

One interesting thing was that he said it wasn't because the women couldn't hit hard (Serena could), it was that they weren't chasing down shots that he thought they could. He was trying to throw them a bone and make the match fun/interesting but many times, they couldn't reach the shots that he was trying to give to them to return.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know about Clark but I don't think Sophie is going to last much longer. Even with the finals there's about three months left in the season (yes I had to look that up).

It's just too much negativity for someone who is clearly such a positive person. She can make tons of money (and already is) with no official affiliation to the NBA or can go to Europe or both.

Just no need to stay tethered to this garbage.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

The USWNT team lost against an U-15 boys team, 5-2 in 2017.
The Swiss Women's national team lost against an U-15 boys team, 7-1.

Swimming WR's tell the story. There is no physical interaction between competitors.
50M Freestyle (long course) WR: Men's: 20.33 s, Women's: 23.55 s
1500M Freestyle WR: Mens: 14 min 30.67 s, Womens 15 min 20.48 s

There is no comparison between men and women when it comes to athletics.

It comes down to genetics and what's that thing.... TESTOSTERONE.

Why is this even a f'ing question? Liberals claim to be the "trust the science" party. Apparently not.

Men are men and women are women. yes there are rare cases of genetic anomalies, XXY chromosomes, etc... but these are rare.


However, there was a study in Chile that around 3% of people identified as the opposite sex. But it was later determined that study had beans in it. (ha.) Who the F is gonna trust a study from Chile?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.