Sophie Cunningham

146,307 Views | 1053 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by ts5641
AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never shoulda left.
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AxelFoley85 said:

Never shoulda left.

why you projecting bro?
T dizl televizl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AustinAg2K said:

Is she wrong, though? First, you went and bought a ticket the WNBA. Second, you went out and bought a dildo. Two pretty solid signs your gay.


Wait it is gay to buy dildos now? What if the dildo is going to be used for heterosexual sex? Or is it only gay if it is a double sided dildo for homosexual sex?

Are only women allowed to buy sex toys for themselves?

This is very complicated.

I do agree that it is gay to buy a ticket to the wnba though.
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
T dizl televizl said:

AustinAg2K said:

Is she wrong, though? First, you went and bought a ticket the WNBA. Second, you went out and bought a dildo. Two pretty solid signs your gay.


Wait it is gay to buy dildos now? What if the dildo is going to be used for heterosexual sex? Or is it only gay if it is a double sided dildo for homosexual sex?

Are only women allowed to buy sex toys for themselves?

This is very complicated.

I do agree that it is gay to buy a ticket to the wnba though.

if you are a gay man wouldn't buying a ticket to an NBA game be better?...not following buying a WNBA ticket is gay from a male perspective.
T dizl televizl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HaroldShipmanAg said:

T dizl televizl said:

AustinAg2K said:

Is she wrong, though? First, you went and bought a ticket the WNBA. Second, you went out and bought a dildo. Two pretty solid signs your gay.


Wait it is gay to buy dildos now? What if the dildo is going to be used for heterosexual sex? Or is it only gay if it is a double sided dildo for homosexual sex?

Are only women allowed to buy sex toys for themselves?

This is very complicated.

I do agree that it is gay to buy a ticket to the wnba though.

if you are a gay man wouldn't buying a ticket to an NBA game be better?...not following buying a WNBA ticket is gay from a male perspective.


lol true. The gay in you would love to see sweaty men "body up" on each other.

In fact all men that buy tickets to the nba are probably a little gay. On the spectrum of gay if you will
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WNBA is in a PR nightmare and I love it!!

Just saw that Clark had a big ass smirk on her face at the end of the video. Perfect!!

boulderaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can't we all get along and get back to Sophie?
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
did the announcers just misgender "natasha" there?
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gaeilge said:

WNBA is in a PR nightmare and I love it!!

Just saw that Clark had a big ass smirk on her face at the end of the video. Perfect!!



Look at the height differential in that video.....he would average 70 a night on them, minimum.
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.


I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?

It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.

It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It’s never too late
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AustinAg2K said:

ts5641 said:

Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.


I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?

It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.

It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.

I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point. We don't even need these stunts. Just look at the top 100 male high school athletes in track and field. They would all set WORLD records as females in their respective T&F categories. It's all well documented. Biological men should not compete against women...period.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Will be labeled a racist for that.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WIFEY MATERIAL!!
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point. We don't even need these stunts. Just look at the top 100 male high school athletes in track and field. They would all set WORLD records as females in their respective T&F categories. It's all well documented. Biological men should not compete against women...period.

yep, the point is some rando showed up day of and beat athletes that train every day.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:

AustinAg2K said:

ts5641 said:

Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.


I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?

It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.

It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.

I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point.

That actually is the point of the video. The video clearly states he defeated D1 athletes. He did not. If you google the guys name, "Sarah Curren," you will find the results. It wasn't a D1 race, it was an open race that anyone can join, and yes there were D3 athletes there, but they weren't necessarily 100 M sprinters. They were just girls who signed up to run. He ran a 12.53, which is actually impressive if the guy truly hasn't run 100M since HS (I doubt that's true, though, as he runs a sports based Youtube channel). Still, though, a 12.53 doesn't get you on any D1 team in the country. It doesn't even get you in the top 100 of Texas HS. The state champion in girls last year ran an 11.14, so the video could be titled, "Guy gets absolutely smoked by a high school girl."

You are correct that there is plenty of evidence that men are far superior athletes than women, which is why we shouldn't be promoting stupid stunts like this that lie about their results and attempt to laugh at female athletes. A WNBA player could just as easily go challenge the captain of the chess team to a one on one match, beat him 15-13, and then post a video online about how she dominated a D1 player. They are both lies, so why promote either?

Most female athletes don't want men in their sports, so why subject them to this kind of ridicule? Some of y'all are getting a bit crazy in this whole men are better than women thing. It's only a very fringe contingent trying to say it's all equal. A lot of these girls and women are still extremely good athletes and can beat the average man, who in American is most likely obese. They shouldn't be made to be the subject of these stunts.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The fringe contingent is the loudest voice and needs to be ridiculed into oblivion for it.
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AustinAg2K said:

Prosperdick said:

AustinAg2K said:

ts5641 said:

Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.


I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?

It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.

It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.

I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point.

That actually is the point of the video. The video clearly states he defeated D1 athletes. He did not. If you google the guys name, "Sarah Curren," you will find the results. It wasn't a D1 race, it was an open race that anyone can join, and yes there were D3 athletes there, but they weren't necessarily 100 M sprinters. They were just girls who signed up to run. He ran a 12.53, which is actually impressive if the guy truly hasn't run 100M since HS (I doubt that's true, though, as he runs a sports based Youtube channel). Still, though, a 12.53 doesn't get you on any D1 team in the country. It doesn't even get you in the top 100 of Texas HS. The state champion in girls last year ran an 11.14, so the video could be titled, "Guy gets absolutely smoked by a high school girl."

You are correct that there is plenty of evidence that men are far superior athletes than women, which is why we shouldn't be promoting stupid stunts like this that lie about their results and attempt to laugh at female athletes. A WNBA player could just as easily go challenge the captain of the chess team to a one on one match, beat him 15-13, and then post a video online about how she dominated a D1 player. They are both lies, so why promote either?

Most female athletes don't want men in their sports, so why subject them to this kind of ridicule? Some of y'all are getting a bit crazy in this whole men are better than women thing. It's only a very fringe contingent trying to say it's all equal. A lot of these girls and women are still extremely good athletes and can beat the average man, who in American is most likely obese. They shouldn't be made to be the subject of these stunts.

Firstly, women are more likely to be obese than men and the average man will still destroy most college female athletes...
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAggie_02 said:

Quote:

I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point. We don't even need these stunts. Just look at the top 100 male high school athletes in track and field. They would all set WORLD records as females in their respective T&F categories. It's all well documented. Biological men should not compete against women...period.

yep, the point is some rando showed up day of and beat athletes that train every day.

Except he's not a rando.
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Top 600 male tennis player in the world destroyed Serena Willaims while smoking cigarettes an average man will destroy a female "athlete"
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaroldShipmanAg said:

AustinAg2K said:

Prosperdick said:

AustinAg2K said:

ts5641 said:

Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.


I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?

It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.

It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.

I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point.

That actually is the point of the video. The video clearly states he defeated D1 athletes. He did not. If you google the guys name, "Sarah Curren," you will find the results. It wasn't a D1 race, it was an open race that anyone can join, and yes there were D3 athletes there, but they weren't necessarily 100 M sprinters. They were just girls who signed up to run. He ran a 12.53, which is actually impressive if the guy truly hasn't run 100M since HS (I doubt that's true, though, as he runs a sports based Youtube channel). Still, though, a 12.53 doesn't get you on any D1 team in the country. It doesn't even get you in the top 100 of Texas HS. The state champion in girls last year ran an 11.14, so the video could be titled, "Guy gets absolutely smoked by a high school girl."

You are correct that there is plenty of evidence that men are far superior athletes than women, which is why we shouldn't be promoting stupid stunts like this that lie about their results and attempt to laugh at female athletes. A WNBA player could just as easily go challenge the captain of the chess team to a one on one match, beat him 15-13, and then post a video online about how she dominated a D1 player. They are both lies, so why promote either?

Most female athletes don't want men in their sports, so why subject them to this kind of ridicule? Some of y'all are getting a bit crazy in this whole men are better than women thing. It's only a very fringe contingent trying to say it's all equal. A lot of these girls and women are still extremely good athletes and can beat the average man, who in American is most likely obese. They shouldn't be made to be the subject of these stunts.

Firstly, women are more likely to be obese than men and the average man will still destroy most college female athletes...

Who cares if women are more likely to obese. The average woman doesn't matter. College female athelets are what we are talking about, and they are not likely to be obese.

Second, in track, the average man will not beat a D1 College Female athlete. Go out to your local track, run a 100M and then compare that time to a D1 100M time. It's all very easy to verify. Can you run a sub 12 100M? I don't think you can.
AustinAg2K
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaroldShipmanAg said:

Top 600 male tennis player in the world destroyed Serena Willaims while smoking cigarettes an average man will destroy a female "athlete"

Top 600 male tennis player is not the average man. Average man will lose 6-0, 6-0 and not even return a serve from Serena. Average man probably double faults nearly every serve attempt.
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zapata23 said:



One of the few WNBA players who had a good daddy. Or a daddy at all. You can just tell.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
USAFAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
johnnyblaze36 said:




Who is this chick culturally appropriating Sophie Cunningham's hair and style?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaroldShipmanAg said:

Top 600 male tennis player in the world destroyed Serena Willaims while smoking cigarettes an average man will destroy a female "athlete"


Correct
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zapata23 said:



Those knees!!!!1

I keep watching this to know what kind of sharp-kneed women to steer clear of .
One Eyed Reveille
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The real test would be to take an average dude and the D1 female 100 m champ and put them both in a shot put competition. Both using the same weight shot. Who do you think wins.
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AustinAg2K said:

ts5641 said:

Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.


I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?

It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.

It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.

Well, ackshwally......
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

AustinAg2K said:

ts5641 said:

Backyard Gator said:



A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.


I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?

It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.

It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.

I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point. We don't even need these stunts. Just look at the top 100 male high school athletes in track and field. They would all set WORLD records as females in their respective T&F categories. It's all well documented. Biological men should not compete against women...period.


Yeah the point is proven regardless if generic guy off the street can beat D2 athletes what do you think a borderline D1 athlete who can't crack the top 50 of men's events can do against women when the opportunity is there to declare himself a woman and dominate on the other side. The top men are not going to do it but a middling guy who can't be what he dreams of on the mens side can absolutely dominate the womens side and destroy women's athletics. Records will be shattered.

I don't understand putting touchy feely everyone should be protected BS ahead of protecting actual women.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BigRobSA said:

Zapata23 said:



Those knees!!!!1

I keep watching this to know what kind of sharp-kneed women to steer clear of .


Knees? What knees?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.