Project 2025.
Sophie Cunningham
155,505 Views |
1056 Replies |
Last: 5 days ago by WestHoustonAg79
AxelFoley85 said:
Project 2025.
gay
AustinAg2K said:HaroldShipmanAg said:AustinAg2K said:Prosperdick said:AustinAg2K said:ts5641 said:Backyard Gator said:One average dude races college athlete ladies 🤣🕺💃 pic.twitter.com/YHj0vRScnE
— bluemontauk (@bluemontauk) August 23, 2026
A non track guy walks in a beats D1 female athletes. The left should be ashamed of its stance re men in women's sports but it's really about causing the division more than it is for trannies.
I doubt these were D1 athletes. Maybe it's some sort of intermural event. You aren't just going to walk into a D1 track meet and be allowed to run. Also, just look at what the women he's running against look like. Those aren't the best athletes in the country. There's only one black girl. Do you really think the best runners in the country are a bunch of 5' 2" white girls?
It's pretty easy to look up D1 times and see this guy would have gotten smoked by a female D1 sprinter. I just looked up what A&M's 100M was last year. Camryn Dickson ran an 11.17 and placed 16th. Jasmine Montgomery ran an 11.16 and was 15th. Go down to your local track and time yourself. You're not coming close to that.
It's one thing to say women athletes aren't as good as men athletes. It's completely different to say some random guy of the street could win a D1 race. That video should be titled random guy barely beats random girls in a race.
I believe it was a D2 event and yes, he would get smoked by real D1 female athletes but that's not the point.
That actually is the point of the video. The video clearly states he defeated D1 athletes. He did not. If you google the guys name, "Sarah Curren," you will find the results. It wasn't a D1 race, it was an open race that anyone can join, and yes there were D3 athletes there, but they weren't necessarily 100 M sprinters. They were just girls who signed up to run. He ran a 12.53, which is actually impressive if the guy truly hasn't run 100M since HS (I doubt that's true, though, as he runs a sports based Youtube channel). Still, though, a 12.53 doesn't get you on any D1 team in the country. It doesn't even get you in the top 100 of Texas HS. The state champion in girls last year ran an 11.14, so the video could be titled, "Guy gets absolutely smoked by a high school girl."
You are correct that there is plenty of evidence that men are far superior athletes than women, which is why we shouldn't be promoting stupid stunts like this that lie about their results and attempt to laugh at female athletes. A WNBA player could just as easily go challenge the captain of the chess team to a one on one match, beat him 15-13, and then post a video online about how she dominated a D1 player. They are both lies, so why promote either?
Most female athletes don't want men in their sports, so why subject them to this kind of ridicule? Some of y'all are getting a bit crazy in this whole men are better than women thing. It's only a very fringe contingent trying to say it's all equal. A lot of these girls and women are still extremely good athletes and can beat the average man, who in American is most likely obese. They shouldn't be made to be the subject of these stunts.
Firstly, women are more likely to be obese than men and the average man will still destroy most college female athletes...
Who cares if women are more likely to obese. The average woman doesn't matter. College female athelets are what we are talking about, and they are not likely to be obese.
Second, in track, the average man will not beat a D1 College Female athlete. Go out to your local track, run a 100M and then compare that time to a D1 100M time. It's all very easy to verify. Can you run a sub 12 100M? I don't think you can.
Yeah, but the winner of the 1A 100M at state last year would have placed top 5 at the Paris Olympics in women's 100M. The 2A winner would have stood on top of the podium. Not necessarily an "average man", but kids from one stoplight towns with minimal facilities and coaching against the very top female athletes in the world.
Warning: NSFW language in tweet
🚨 SYDNEY COLSON’S ARGUMENT IS EXACTLY WHAT’S WRONG WITH IDENTITY POLITICS. 🚨
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 26, 2026
“Black women built this league.”
“Black queer women built this league.”
“We’re the majority…”
OKAY… SO WHAT?!
Black women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Black queer women have been… pic.twitter.com/DP6wzjqOgr
Quote:
Black queer women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Nobody is denying that.
But apparently somebody needs to explain this:
IMPORTANT OWNERSHIP.
You don't get to minimize every straight woman, white woman, owner, executive, coach, fan, sponsor and player who helped build this league because you've decided YOUR demographic deserves the loudest microphone.
And you DAMN SURE don't get to imply:
"WE BUILT IT.
WE'RE THE MAJORITY.
WE DECIDE WHAT INCLUSION MEANS.
EVERYBODY ELSE FALL IN LINE."
HELL NO.
Your RACE doesn't make your opinion law.
Your SEXUALITY doesn't make your argument untouchable.
Being the MAJORITY doesn't give you intellectual ownership over everybody else.
And here's the hilarious part:
The WNBA has literally had TWO BLACK WOMEN RUN THE LEAGUE LAUREL RICHIE AND LISA BORDERS.
So spare me this idea that one particular demographic gets to plant a flag in the middle of the WNBA and declare:
"THIS IS OUR LEAGUE."
No.
YOU HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE.
YOU HAVE A VOICE AT THE TABLE.
YOU DESERVE RESPECT AT THE TABLE.
But you do NOT own the ****ing table.
And you damn sure don't get to tell everybody else sitting there what they're allowed to think.
@SydJColson
@espnW
@WNBA
I guess she's too stupid to realize the irony of her racism.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Ben Franklin
Backyard Gator said:
Warning: NSFW language in tweet🚨 SYDNEY COLSON’S ARGUMENT IS EXACTLY WHAT’S WRONG WITH IDENTITY POLITICS. 🚨
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 26, 2026
“Black women built this league.”
“Black queer women built this league.”
“We’re the majority…”
OKAY… SO WHAT?!
Black women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Black queer women have been… pic.twitter.com/DP6wzjqOgrQuote:
Black queer women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Nobody is denying that.
But apparently somebody needs to explain this:
IMPORTANT OWNERSHIP.
You don't get to minimize every straight woman, white woman, owner, executive, coach, fan, sponsor and player who helped build this league because you've decided YOUR demographic deserves the loudest microphone.
And you DAMN SURE don't get to imply:
"WE BUILT IT.
WE'RE THE MAJORITY.
WE DECIDE WHAT INCLUSION MEANS.
EVERYBODY ELSE FALL IN LINE."
HELL NO.
Your RACE doesn't make your opinion law.
Your SEXUALITY doesn't make your argument untouchable.
Being the MAJORITY doesn't give you intellectual ownership over everybody else.
And here's the hilarious part:
The WNBA has literally had TWO BLACK WOMEN RUN THE LEAGUE LAUREL RICHIE AND LISA BORDERS.
So spare me this idea that one particular demographic gets to plant a flag in the middle of the WNBA and declare:
"THIS IS OUR LEAGUE."
No.
YOU HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE.
YOU HAVE A VOICE AT THE TABLE.
YOU DESERVE RESPECT AT THE TABLE.
But you do NOT own the ****ing table.
And you damn sure don't get to tell everybody else sitting there what they're allowed to think.
@SydJColson
@espnW
@WNBA
Good for our own to speak sensibly.
Gig'Em and God Bless,
JB'91
JB'91
White & Black Men built that league. Your entire existence is based on them paying the bills because no body wants to pay for your trash ass sport. You are literally less than worthless without the NBA to prop you up as you are a giant red dollar amount on the balance sheet!
NBA owners built the league with their money.
Black lesbos couldn't get anyone to watch
White girl built the fan base.
Black lesbos didn't build ***** They just grifted.
Black lesbos couldn't get anyone to watch
White girl built the fan base.
Black lesbos didn't build ***** They just grifted.
LOL OLD
Seems they're conveniently leaving out the most important part -- all the old, straight, white men that built the NBA, then then built this league.
As usual just need the liberal hypocrites to open their mouth to paint their position and values as completely contrary to what they believe and preach.
Like they say: usually better to keep your mouth shut and let people think you are a fool rather than open it and prove you are a complete hypocrite and idiot.
Taking her logic to its practical limit, only queer black biological woman should attend, own, run, and play in the league. Good luck!
boulderaggie said:
Taking her logic to its practical limit, only queer black biological woman should attend, own, run, and play in the league. Good luck!
= BROKE ASS LEAGUE
Currently your league only exists because of straight white business men and fans who support a different league and don't even really pay attention to your product. But some interest has increased lately because of straight white FEMALE players in your league.
So how bout you STFU and be thankful you aren't working a minimum wage job where you would still be working for those business men and paying customers but would not have the luxuries you currently enjoy.
Zombie Jon Snow said:boulderaggie said:
Taking her logic to its practical limit, only queer black biological woman should attend, own, run, and play in the league. Good luck!
= BROKE ASS LEAGUE
Currently your league only exists because of straight white business men and fans who are mostly cis gendered and support a different league and don't even really pay attention to your product. But some interest has increased lately because of straight white cis gendered players in your league.
So how bout you STFU and be thankful you aren't working a minimum wage job where you would still be working for those business men and paying customers but would not have the luxuries you currently enjoy.
Bro, drop term cisgender from your vocabulary.
It's a made up word created as an alternate to transgender in an attempt to normalize their mental illness. By replacing 'normal' with 'cisgender', you're supporting their agenda.
Just using their terminology to prove their idiocy. I don't use it in normal conversation.
Such a FAIL of a human being.
Sophie Cunningham tried to teach a “What is a woman?” class. Angel Reese, Natasha Cloud, Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White showed up. 😂 pic.twitter.com/72JUDh30DP
— Dr. Clown, PhD (@DrClownPhD) August 26, 2026
Backyard Gator said:Sophie Cunningham tried to teach a “What is a woman?” class. Angel Reese, Natasha Cloud, Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White showed up. 😂 pic.twitter.com/72JUDh30DP
— Dr. Clown, PhD (@DrClownPhD) August 26, 2026
Quality AI video use.
Gig'Em and God Bless,
JB'91
JB'91
Backyard Gator said:Sophie Cunningham tried to teach a “What is a woman?” class. Angel Reese, Natasha Cloud, Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White showed up. 😂 pic.twitter.com/72JUDh30DP
— Dr. Clown, PhD (@DrClownPhD) August 26, 2026
Can't give enough blue stars to this!
Backyard Gator said:
Warning: NSFW language in tweet🚨 SYDNEY COLSON’S ARGUMENT IS EXACTLY WHAT’S WRONG WITH IDENTITY POLITICS. 🚨
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 26, 2026
“Black women built this league.”
“Black queer women built this league.”
“We’re the majority…”
OKAY… SO WHAT?!
Black women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Black queer women have been… pic.twitter.com/DP6wzjqOgrQuote:
Black queer women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Nobody is denying that.
But apparently somebody needs to explain this:
IMPORTANT OWNERSHIP.
You don't get to minimize every straight woman, white woman, owner, executive, coach, fan, sponsor and player who helped build this league because you've decided YOUR demographic deserves the loudest microphone.
And you DAMN SURE don't get to imply:
"WE BUILT IT.
WE'RE THE MAJORITY.
WE DECIDE WHAT INCLUSION MEANS.
EVERYBODY ELSE FALL IN LINE."
HELL NO.
Your RACE doesn't make your opinion law.
Your SEXUALITY doesn't make your argument untouchable.
Being the MAJORITY doesn't give you intellectual ownership over everybody else.
And here's the hilarious part:
The WNBA has literally had TWO BLACK WOMEN RUN THE LEAGUE LAUREL RICHIE AND LISA BORDERS.
So spare me this idea that one particular demographic gets to plant a flag in the middle of the WNBA and declare:
"THIS IS OUR LEAGUE."
No.
YOU HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE.
YOU HAVE A VOICE AT THE TABLE.
YOU DESERVE RESPECT AT THE TABLE.
But you do NOT own the ****ing table.
And you damn sure don't get to tell everybody else sitting there what they're allowed to think.
@SydJColson
@espnW
@WNBA
I wonder what her thoughts are on who built this country, who the majority of this country is, and thus who should get to make all the decisions for this country.
Backyard Gator said:
Warning: NSFW language in tweet🚨 SYDNEY COLSON’S ARGUMENT IS EXACTLY WHAT’S WRONG WITH IDENTITY POLITICS. 🚨
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 26, 2026
“Black women built this league.”
“Black queer women built this league.”
“We’re the majority…”
OKAY… SO WHAT?!
Black women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Black queer women have been… pic.twitter.com/DP6wzjqOgrQuote:
Black queer women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Nobody is denying that.
But apparently somebody needs to explain this:
IMPORTANT OWNERSHIP.
You don't get to minimize every straight woman, white woman, owner, executive, coach, fan, sponsor and player who helped build this league because you've decided YOUR demographic deserves the loudest microphone.
And you DAMN SURE don't get to imply:
"WE BUILT IT.
WE'RE THE MAJORITY.
WE DECIDE WHAT INCLUSION MEANS.
EVERYBODY ELSE FALL IN LINE."
HELL NO.
Your RACE doesn't make your opinion law.
Your SEXUALITY doesn't make your argument untouchable.
Being the MAJORITY doesn't give you intellectual ownership over everybody else.
And here's the hilarious part:
The WNBA has literally had TWO BLACK WOMEN RUN THE LEAGUE LAUREL RICHIE AND LISA BORDERS.
So spare me this idea that one particular demographic gets to plant a flag in the middle of the WNBA and declare:
"THIS IS OUR LEAGUE."
No.
YOU HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE.
YOU HAVE A VOICE AT THE TABLE.
YOU DESERVE RESPECT AT THE TABLE.
But you do NOT own the ****ing table.
And you damn sure don't get to tell everybody else sitting there what they're allowed to think.
@SydJColson
@espnW
@WNBA
Imagine having to resort to twitter slop like this for attention for your league instead of just trying to inspire young women to become fans of the sport and have them see that it has a future if you focus on learning how to play better basketball and compete.
This is nothing more than a W(WE)NBA, subsidized by the NBA; a similar league that is losing the cultural relevance that it actually once had in the mid-80s to late aughts.
Backyard Gator said:
Warning: NSFW language in tweet🚨 SYDNEY COLSON’S ARGUMENT IS EXACTLY WHAT’S WRONG WITH IDENTITY POLITICS. 🚨
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 26, 2026
“Black women built this league.”
“Black queer women built this league.”
“We’re the majority…”
OKAY… SO WHAT?!
Black women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Black queer women have been… pic.twitter.com/DP6wzjqOgr
Backyard Gator said:
Warning: NSFW language in tweet🚨 SYDNEY COLSON’S ARGUMENT IS EXACTLY WHAT’S WRONG WITH IDENTITY POLITICS. 🚨
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 26, 2026
“Black women built this league.”
“Black queer women built this league.”
“We’re the majority…”
OKAY… SO WHAT?!
Black women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Black queer women have been… pic.twitter.com/DP6wzjqOgrQuote:
Black queer women have been enormously important to the WNBA.
Nobody is denying that.
But apparently somebody needs to explain this:
IMPORTANT OWNERSHIP.
You don't get to minimize every straight woman, white woman, owner, executive, coach, fan, sponsor and player who helped build this league because you've decided YOUR demographic deserves the loudest microphone.
And you DAMN SURE don't get to imply:
"WE BUILT IT.
WE'RE THE MAJORITY.
WE DECIDE WHAT INCLUSION MEANS.
EVERYBODY ELSE FALL IN LINE."
HELL NO.
Your RACE doesn't make your opinion law.
Your SEXUALITY doesn't make your argument untouchable.
Being the MAJORITY doesn't give you intellectual ownership over everybody else.
And here's the hilarious part:
The WNBA has literally had TWO BLACK WOMEN RUN THE LEAGUE LAUREL RICHIE AND LISA BORDERS.
So spare me this idea that one particular demographic gets to plant a flag in the middle of the WNBA and declare:
"THIS IS OUR LEAGUE."
No.
YOU HAVE A SEAT AT THE TABLE.
YOU HAVE A VOICE AT THE TABLE.
YOU DESERVE RESPECT AT THE TABLE.
But you do NOT own the ****ing table.
And you damn sure don't get to tell everybody else sitting there what they're allowed to think.
@SydJColson
@espnW
@WNBA
So a league that relies on the NBA for tens of millions of dollars so they don't go bankrupt is something they are proud of?
Look at the orators in our republics; as long as they are poor, both state and people can only praise their uprightness; but once they are fattened on the public funds, they conceive a hatred for justice, plan intrigues against the people and attack the democracy.
-Aristophanes
-Aristophanes
Sophie Cunningham before the game 😭 pic.twitter.com/7o3YGeKmli
— BrickCenter (@BrickCenter_) August 27, 2026
Backyard Gator said:Sophie Cunningham before the game 😭 pic.twitter.com/7o3YGeKmli
— BrickCenter (@BrickCenter_) August 27, 2026
SHE'S ADORABLE!!!
Angel Reese got the $1 million question... you’ll never guess her final answer. 😂 pic.twitter.com/dFBO7DRCAO
— Dr. Clown, PhD (@DrClownPhD) August 27, 2026
Sophie Cunningham dancing at the pool. pic.twitter.com/xbbUOtXF7K
— MAGAfan1776 (@magafan1776) August 27, 2026
Angel Reese being one of the biggest players on the floor just to shoot 190/382 from 0–5 FEET is absolutely sending me 🏀🏀🏀
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 27, 2026
192 MISSES FROM FIVE FEET OR CLOSER.
Sis is basically standing next to the basket and shooting 49.7%. 😭
Every possession is an adventure:
🏀 Catch… pic.twitter.com/Tp9UWp9b5Z
Angel Reese wants you to realize people don't watch the WNBA because of Caitlin Clark, they watch it because they want to watch Reese miss layups an 8 yr old can make.
Backyard Gator said:Angel Reese being one of the biggest players on the floor just to shoot 190/382 from 0–5 FEET is absolutely sending me 🏀🏀🏀
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 27, 2026
192 MISSES FROM FIVE FEET OR CLOSER.
Sis is basically standing next to the basket and shooting 49.7%. 😭
Every possession is an adventure:
🏀 Catch… pic.twitter.com/Tp9UWp9b5Z
Angel Reese wants you to realize people don't watch the WNBA because of Caitlin Clark, they watch it because they want to watch Reese miss layups an 8 yr old can make.
But, when you miss that many at point blank range, you can get rebounds!!! People watch basketball because of rebounds!!!
382 - 190 =192 potential rebounds.
LOL OLD
imagine its a little more difficult when you can only have one eye on the basket
Backyard Gator said:Sophie Cunningham dancing at the pool. pic.twitter.com/xbbUOtXF7K
— MAGAfan1776 (@magafan1776) August 27, 2026
Those elbows!!! Too sharp!
Backyard Gator said:Angel Reese being one of the biggest players on the floor just to shoot 190/382 from 0–5 FEET is absolutely sending me 🏀🏀🏀
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 27, 2026
192 MISSES FROM FIVE FEET OR CLOSER.
Sis is basically standing next to the basket and shooting 49.7%. 😭
Every possession is an adventure:
🏀 Catch… pic.twitter.com/Tp9UWp9b5Z
Angel Reese wants you to realize people don't watch the WNBA because of Caitlin Clark, they watch it because they want to watch Reese miss layups an 8 yr old can make.
The WNBA wants you to reject the evidence of your eyes.
Its their final, most essential command.
I've literally never looked at a girls elbows before. I have to assume this is sarcasm.BigRobSA said:Backyard Gator said:Sophie Cunningham dancing at the pool. pic.twitter.com/xbbUOtXF7K
— MAGAfan1776 (@magafan1776) August 27, 2026
Those elbows!!! Too sharp!
deddog said:Backyard Gator said:Angel Reese being one of the biggest players on the floor just to shoot 190/382 from 0–5 FEET is absolutely sending me 🏀🏀🏀
— Jason (@letstalkksports) August 27, 2026
192 MISSES FROM FIVE FEET OR CLOSER.
Sis is basically standing next to the basket and shooting 49.7%. 😭
Every possession is an adventure:
🏀 Catch… pic.twitter.com/Tp9UWp9b5Z
Angel Reese wants you to realize people don't watch the WNBA because of Caitlin Clark, they watch it because they want to watch Reese miss layups an 8 yr old can make.
The WNBA wants you to reject the evidence of your eyes.
Its their final, most essential command.
Her 3 point shooting is some of the worst shooting I have ever seen, well at least the clips I have seen. They dont even guard her because she is so bad at it.
BroTouchless said:I've literally never looked at a girls elbows before. I have to assume this is sarcasm.BigRobSA said:Backyard Gator said:Sophie Cunningham dancing at the pool. pic.twitter.com/xbbUOtXF7K
— MAGAfan1776 (@magafan1776) August 27, 2026
Those elbows!!! Too sharp!
Do you even TexAgs?
"Sharp knees. 2/10 WNB! "
BigRobSA said:Touchless said:BigRobSA said:Backyard Gator said:Sophie Cunningham dancing at the pool. pic.twitter.com/xbbUOtXF7K
— MAGAfan1776 (@magafan1776) August 27, 2026
Those elbows!!! Too sharp!
I've literally never looked at a girls elbows before. I have to assume this is sarcasm.
Bro
Do you even TexAgs?
"Sharp knees. 2/10 WNB! "
lol, in all the years, I've somehow missed that one.
Featured Stories
See All
15:21
10h ago
18k
The Loochador Podcast: Midseason misery after Missouri
by Billy Liucci
Elko's comments more offensive than futile Aggies
by Olin Buchanan
12 Key Statistics: Missouri 27, Texas A&M 6
by Luke Evangelist
Learned, Loved, Loathed: Missouri 27, Texas A&M 6
by Olin Buchanan
17:51
1d ago
39k
Colonel Ingus
one thing that's making me laugh at all this elko nonsense
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
7
Greg Johnson
The Loochador Podcast: Midseason misery after Missouri
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
5