So Texas-MSU starts at 6.
FWIW.
FWIW.
I heard three sip players just tested positive for being arrogant aholes.aginlakeway said:
So Texas-MSU starts at 6.
FWIW.
Que Te Gusta Mas said:
That seems to be the NC State side because its pretty consistent with the stuff trickling out in their 247 site's thread on it.
dermdoc said:
Not sure I believe that.
Would that not mean that Vandy would get tested also? Even if vaccinated?
dermdoc said:I heard three sip players just tested positive for being arrogant aholes.aginlakeway said:
So Texas-MSU starts at 6.
FWIW.
1stGenAg01 said:
If this is true, then I've lost a ton of respect for Coach Corbin over the last 24 hours. Still can't believe he was able to convince the umpiring crew to change their fair/foul call in the game yesterday after it was obvious the 3B umpire blew the initial call and there was evidence on the chalk line of where the ball hit. I could understand arguing that only a single be awarded instead of presuming a double after the foul call was signaled, but to pursue it to the degree that you expect the batter to go back to the box is gutless. I hope Miss St. takes care of business and beats the hell out of Vandy.
dermdoc said:I heard three sip players just tested positive for being arrogant aholes.aginlakeway said:
So Texas-MSU starts at 6.
FWIW.
aginlakeway said:
So Texas-MSU starts at 6.
FWIW.
VegasAg86 said:dermdoc said:I heard three sip players just tested positive for being arrogant aholes.aginlakeway said:
So Texas-MSU starts at 6.
FWIW.
Why did they only test 3?
Bunk Moreland said:
ESPN opens the broadcast up tonight with as weak of coverage as possible about the issue, but that's not surprising.
Quick acknowledgment, aww shucks, move on.
1stGenAg01 said:
On subjective calls, absolutely 100% do what you can for your team. My problem with that particular moment is there's nothing subjective about a crater in the middle of the foul line. To argue that the ball was foul (or should remain foul) makes you look like integrity means nothing to you.
Aggies2009 said:1stGenAg01 said:
On subjective calls, absolutely 100% do what you can for your team. My problem with that particular moment is there's nothing subjective about a crater in the middle of the foul line. To argue that the ball was foul (or should remain foul) makes you look like integrity means nothing to you.
Reading some of his posts lately make me wonder.
1stGenAg01 said:
On subjective calls, absolutely 100% do what you can for your team. My problem with that particular moment is there's nothing subjective about a crater in the middle of the foul line. To argue that the ball was foul (or should remain foul) makes you look like integrity means nothing to you.
Foul balls called fair are reviewable.1stGenAg01 said:
On subjective calls, absolutely 100% do what you can for your team. My problem with that particular moment is there's nothing subjective about a crater in the middle of the foul line. To argue that the ball was foul (or should remain foul) makes you look like integrity means nothing to you.
powerbelly said:The NCAA should bluff a move away from Omaha to get the health department to back off.twk said:annie88 said:Bull*****Quote:
However their rules were supersede by Douglas County (Nebraska) Health DepartmentSOURCES: The Douglas County Health Department will determine between now and Sunday which members of the #Vanderbilt traveling party will be required to undergo routine COVID-19 testing — all, or just potentially unvaccinated members.
— Kendall Rogers (@KendallRogers) June 26, 2021
You might want to walk that back. Looks to me like we may have some local official on a power trip. Goodness knows the NCAA screws up plenty of stuff on its own, but when you start putting the pieces of this story together, intervention by the Health Department playing a key role fits with what we know.
aginlakeway said:
****
94chem said:aginlakeway said:
****
That's what walks are good for.