***** Official World Cup 2026 Round of 16 Thread *****

104,339 Views | 2035 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by fig96
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Galarza is fearless. I was impressed with him vs Germany but he's been a punk in this one
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
the fan had a banana republic military guy on his shirt - any ideas on who that is?
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That was not a showcase game for the sport.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doue is lucky one of those dudes didn't decide to snap his leg with a 2 footed lunge
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
this guy shouldn't get another match this Cup
LB12MEEN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK

Hope US wins the World Cup.

But if not US

Anyone other than France.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
nomad2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paraguay is shockingly hard to root for with that crap and I'm not a fan of France.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Standard south and central America soccer behavior
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Galarza again... straight up punk
Rule Number 32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was rooting for Paraguay but man I'm glad they are out. They are everything wrong with soccer
AustinScubaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This game was disgusting by both teams and the ref
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Turd
fredfredunderscorefred
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nomad2007 said:

Paraguay is shockingly hard to root for with that crap and I'm not a fan of France.


Pinche payasos
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

dmart90 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

gougler08 said:

oh no said:

Feels cheap for France

Take a dive to get through


The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)


It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.

It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.


My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.

If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.

I understand your argument. But any time the ball is the box its a chance to score. So yes, its justified.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That Paraguay keeper Gil was impressive vs Germany and France. Where's his club? I suspect maybe big clubs will be looking at him
riverrataggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How do these teams board a bus without injuring half the team? I hope they are in wheel chairs between matches.
LB12MEEN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1-0

Told ya

France had no idea how to score without getting a PK.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Definitely France's least impressive performance of the tournament. But did enough.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
those fans on the east side of that stadium have to be well done by now.
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dmart90 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

dmart90 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

gougler08 said:

oh no said:

Feels cheap for France

Take a dive to get through


The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)


It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.

It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.


My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.

If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.

I understand your argument. But any time the ball is the box its a chance to score. So yes, its justified.


he was dribbling towards his own goal please explain how that was a chance to score
Rule Number 32
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dmart90 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

dmart90 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

gougler08 said:

oh no said:

Feels cheap for France

Take a dive to get through


The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)


It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.

It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.


My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.

If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.

I understand your argument. But any time the ball is the box its a chance to score. So yes, its justified.


New to soccer infection? That's why there's a box...
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
f1ghtintexasaggie said:

Mathguy64 said:

I can't believe I'm about to say this.

He hasn't called squat all game. Fouls are happening everywhere and he's not calling anything. Like it or not he either doesn't know what a foul is or doesn't think any of these are fouls.

Is it really a "clear and obvious error" for VAR to call the one in the area for a PK? It's completely different than the way the rest of the match was refereed.


Yes, the game should not be decided by the head ref refusing to do his one job. It should be decided by the rules as written. That PK foul and the one before it outside the box that wasn't even called in favor of "advantage" (when PAR had 9 men behind the ball) were blatantly clear. At some point it becomes the other refs' duty to tell the head ref to pull his head out of his ass.


That's not his job. That's re-refereeing the match. Like it or not the ****ty ref you get is the ****ty ref you got.
La Bamba
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:

Dictator mbappe?

LeonardSkinner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, Morocco should work a little harder to win than Paraguay did. Might be interesting to see how the yellow card situation plays out for Les Bleus.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
was he wearing a napoleon hat?
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paraguay showed their ass to about a billion people and still lost.

I have yelled for years that the reward for a penalty far outweighs the offense 90 percent of the time. My solution is to shrink the 18, make it 12 or 16. Would also have the effect of more goals, because the keeper has less space to control with his hands.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now what do we do?
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paraguay played dirty. Lame.

France ended up being a bunch of whiny b*****s.

It's a shame either advanced.
Tergdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LeonardSkinner said:

Well, Morocco should work a little harder to win than Paraguay did. Might be interesting to see how the yellow card situation plays out for Les Bleus.
Considering half of Morocco's lineup has a yellow, I'd say it's a wash
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RED AG 98 said:

Now what do we do?


Joey Chestnut on Espn Replay
AustinScubaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just imagine a Columbia/Argentina or Brazil/Argentina game with officiating like that. It will be a blood bath.
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AustinScubaAg said:

Just imagine a Columbia/Argentina or Brazil/Argentina game with officiating like that. It will be a blood bath.


Imagine instead of Paraguay that was Uruguay.
SECcess12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dmart90 said:

Paraguay played dirty. Lame.

France ended up being a bunch of whiny b*****s.

It's a shame either advanced.


Both these teams suck for the sport. What a terrible game and bunch of dirty/whiny players on both sides.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rule Number 32 said:

dmart90 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

dmart90 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

gougler08 said:

oh no said:

Feels cheap for France

Take a dive to get through


The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)


It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.

It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.


My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.

If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.

I understand your argument. But any time the ball is the box its a chance to score. So yes, its justified.


New to soccer infection? That's why there's a box...


It's always been my biggest criticism of soccer (along with how offsides is enforced).

The flopping is what it is. Flopping is bad in basketball and I still watch that. I don't like how much power refs are given to decide matches. Hockey is the best comparison, a goal based low scoring sport where they've managed to not allow offsides and officials to decide games. Soccer is EASILY fixed, they just won't do it because of "tradition" and FIFA's desire to maintain the structure that allows for match fixing when they need it.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.