Galarza is fearless. I was impressed with him vs Germany but he's been a punk in this one
nomad2007 said:
Paraguay is shockingly hard to root for with that crap and I'm not a fan of France.
Infection_Ag11 said:dmart90 said:Infection_Ag11 said:gougler08 said:oh no said:
Feels cheap for France
Take a dive to get through
The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)
It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.
It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.
My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.
If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.
dmart90 said:Infection_Ag11 said:dmart90 said:Infection_Ag11 said:gougler08 said:oh no said:
Feels cheap for France
Take a dive to get through
The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)
It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.
It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.
My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.
If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.
I understand your argument. But any time the ball is the box its a chance to score. So yes, its justified.
dmart90 said:Infection_Ag11 said:dmart90 said:Infection_Ag11 said:gougler08 said:oh no said:
Feels cheap for France
Take a dive to get through
The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)
It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.
It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.
My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.
If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.
I understand your argument. But any time the ball is the box its a chance to score. So yes, its justified.
f1ghtintexasaggie said:Mathguy64 said:
I can't believe I'm about to say this.
He hasn't called squat all game. Fouls are happening everywhere and he's not calling anything. Like it or not he either doesn't know what a foul is or doesn't think any of these are fouls.
Is it really a "clear and obvious error" for VAR to call the one in the area for a PK? It's completely different than the way the rest of the match was refereed.
Yes, the game should not be decided by the head ref refusing to do his one job. It should be decided by the rules as written. That PK foul and the one before it outside the box that wasn't even called in favor of "advantage" (when PAR had 9 men behind the ball) were blatantly clear. At some point it becomes the other refs' duty to tell the head ref to pull his head out of his ass.
Who?mikejones! said:
Dictator mbappe?
The Kylian Mbappé ‘dictator’ trend has gone worldwide and it’s funny how he plays into it. 😂 pic.twitter.com/Uwcb8mMqtq
— 10 (@Kylian) July 4, 2026
Considering half of Morocco's lineup has a yellow, I'd say it's a washLeonardSkinner said:
Well, Morocco should work a little harder to win than Paraguay did. Might be interesting to see how the yellow card situation plays out for Les Bleus.
RED AG 98 said:
Now what do we do?
🚨 He was broke. His wife and newborn son nearly died. Today, Orlando Gill is Paraguay's World Cup hero. 🇵🇾
— Football Tweet ⚽ (@Footballtweet) July 2, 2026
His story is one of the most incredible in football.
In 2022, Gill's wife, Melissa, suffered a cardiac arrest while giving birth to their son, Lautaro Daniel. Doctors… pic.twitter.com/37sJaIiOPe
AustinScubaAg said:
Just imagine a Columbia/Argentina or Brazil/Argentina game with officiating like that. It will be a blood bath.
dmart90 said:
Paraguay played dirty. Lame.
France ended up being a bunch of whiny b*****s.
It's a shame either advanced.
Rule Number 32 said:dmart90 said:Infection_Ag11 said:dmart90 said:Infection_Ag11 said:gougler08 said:oh no said:
Feels cheap for France
Take a dive to get through
The Paraguay guy got him in both legs, it wasn't a dive (nor was the first one that didn't get called for a free kick)
It doesn't matter, that wasn't a significant enough act to warrant a free goal. He wasn't even going to get a shot off, and him actually scoring from that position had he gotten a shot off would have required an all time great goal.
It wasn't a dive. It was a clear penalty in the box. Which this ref whiffed on. It matters not which direction the attacker was moviSunday's.a PK every time and twice on Sundays.
My criticism is of the nature of awarding penalty kicks. I'm not disputing that it was a foul in the box. I'm disputing that the events in question warranted France being handed the game on that basis.
If penalty kicks had a 50% conversion rate? Fine. But when a penalty kick essentially equates to a free goal, deciding games on fouls like that will prevent American sports fans from going all in.
I understand your argument. But any time the ball is the box its a chance to score. So yes, its justified.
New to soccer infection? That's why there's a box...