Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Gaslighting should be a bannable offense.

---

Libs lie with incredible ease. Lying is number one in their playbook.

Yep, have to admit we tried to watch an episode years ago...but we knew back then we'd never watch again...& dang sure aren't starting now...

tunefx said:

---

Dan Carlin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

You know what I find offensive? That Charlie Kirk was assassinated. That Donald Trump was shot in the ear. That another guy was preparing to take him out. The rhetoric has and continues to be over the top from the left and here you are advocating the continued violent speech, which has led to unthinkable hatred and violence. Stop it. Stop it.

---

What is "violent speech" and how have I advocated for it?

IMO "violent speech" is the president of the United States using a horrible murder perpetrated by a deranged individual to to cast aspersion on all his political opponents.

---

So, you're ok with all the impeachments and constant lawfare against DJT? Never any violent speech from those attempting to take him down?

Maybe we should hear your definition of violent speech.

---

He's defending Islam on another thread while branding opposition as xenophobia and racism from the alt right.

Still waiting on a response of how opposition to the religion with the most holy prophet who marries and consummated a marriage with a child AND murders 700 people at minimum is alt right.

Im certain you wont get a valid response on violence

Dan Carlin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

You know what I find offensive? That Charlie Kirk was assassinated. That Donald Trump was shot in the ear. That another guy was preparing to take him out. The rhetoric has and continues to be over the top from the left and here you are advocating the continued violent speech, which has led to unthinkable hatred and violence. Stop it. Stop it.

---

What is "violent speech" and how have I advocated for it?

IMO "violent speech" is the president of the United States using a horrible murder perpetrated by a deranged individual to to cast aspersion on all his political opponents.

---

You ask for examples of "violent speech"; well, literally a few posts before the one quoted above, you wrote:

"... punch the authoritarian in the nose and resist."

WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!?!

Do y'all not see, recognize, &/or hear how commonplace it is for y'all to either encourage &/or condone violence?

Keyboard anonymity clearly suits you, & the comfort provided by your perceived privacy encourages you to continue trolling by doubling down on the unproven & debunked lies you continue to utter.

HOWEVER, one day you're gonna shoot your mouth off, having become so emboldened on forums/ social media to make bombastic claims &/or spew proven lies that you no longer use a filter; I'm afraid on such an occasion someone will finally have enough & meet you & your Leftist friends' calls for violence with a solid uppercut to your chin that'll immediately drop your ass to the floor like a sack of potatoes!!

And IF that happens (although I pray it doesn't), don't you dare be hypocritical by calling the police IF you ever demanded their dissolution &/or defunding; doing so would be a very "Jimmy Kimmel Thing" to do!!!

Charlie Kirk was senselessly murdered after Democrat politicians and all of their Pravda media programmed over and over again relentlessly that he was a hateful Nazi and every other name in their book. We all know he was none of those things, but we know those things spewed on their nasty corners of the internet and social media mobs. They programmed their low iq useful idiots intentionally, knowing how mentally ill so much of their base is. It's personal to a lot of us because millions of us share Charlie Kirk's very normal rational opinions and the left wanted him dead for those opinions we all share. Then we have to watch millions of people celebrate and rejoice about his close up videoed death on social media.

Jimmy Kimmel, in his pandering to his Hollywood and low IQ brainwashed base, was a ***** as usual and Sinclair and Nexstar decided that enough was enough and pulled him before ever hearing anything from Donald Trump or Brendan Carr or anyone else at the FCC, so obviously ABC's decision to suspend the show was based on the broadcast affiliates and not government pressure to censor speech.

The brainwashed leftist useful idiots, NPCs, and bots won't get any sympathy from the right about "freedom of speech" when Obama-Biden's government pressured tech platform monopolies to censor and ban conservatives, and actually censored and banned the NY post to alter an election, and banned the duly elected POTUS.

The left can't claim the ritaarded low IQ argument of "authoritarian" or "dictator" abuse here just because Brendan Carr was satisfied with Sinclair and Nexstar's decisions and reminded the public of the responsibility of broadcasting license holders, or because Trump railed on Kimmel on truth social, because the left has actually done so much worse.

The reality is that Disney executives and their board of directors had some pressures to deal with quickly. A negative earnings low ratings show spewing lies as bad jokes and spiking the football at a very sensitive divisive topic involving an assassination, broadcasting affiliates pushing back, the FCC chair going on news shows with after the fact comments, shareholders/investors likely getting nervous with uncertainty.

But there was no dictator and no free speech violation whatsoever. The ritaarded bots replying otherwise on this thread know it. They just want to keep up the hate filled hyperbole so conservatives keep getting killed and they need everyone to sit back and take it because "free speech".

DoitBest said:

---

Yep, have to admit we tried to watch an episode years ago...but we knew back then we'd never watch again...& dang sure aren't starting now...

---

I have never watched even 1 minute of his shows- can't stand those late night guys that get up there with their agenda and are not even funny - not wasting time watching that kind of trashy show

Quote:

---

HOWEVER, one day you're gonna shoot your mouth off, having become so emboldened on forums/ social media to make bombastic claims &/or spew proven lies that you no longer use a filter; I'm afraid on such an occasion someone will finally have enough & meet you & your Leftist friends' calls for violence with a solid uppercut to your chin that'll immediately drop your ass to the floor like a sack of potatoes!!

---

Trying to remember a social situation where anything of the sort was said out loud by a conservative/Republican/right-leaning individual in mixed company and can't recall a single incident. But I couldn't begin to count the number of times that I've suffered a liberal raising their voice and going off on some misinformed gaslighting diatribe. "Proof by belligerent assertion" is very much a liberal thing in my experience.

But thanks for sharing your violent fantasies about what you would wish on someone with an opposing viewpoint. Speaks volumes...

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Gaslighting should be a bannable offense.

---

If it were, then a ton of Covid-era posters who beat our brains in about "follow the science", "mandate the jab", and "2 weeks to flatten the curve" would have been dismissed long ago…

One can only wish…

I was pretty plugged into the news that day and I swear the timeline went like this.

1. Sinclair preempts Kimmel
2. FCC admin then backs them up saying Kimmel was spreading false information about the shooter and his violent rhetoric and lies don't belong on public airwaves
3. Trump then chimes in about Kimmel being a hack and that he was glad he was gone.

And all I hear from the left is that it started with Trump and went backwards from there.

Wildmen03 said:

---

I was pretty plugged into the news that day and I swear the timeline went like this.

1. Sinclair preempts Kimmel
2. FCC admin then backs them up saying Kimmel was spreading false information about the shooter and his violent rhetoric and lies don't belong on public airwaves
3. Trump then chimes in about Kimmel being a hack and that he was glad he was gone.

And all I hear from the left is that it started with Trump and went backwards from there.

---

This is correct. Perfect example for anybody who still doesn't understand the concept of liberal "gaslighting".

If the left says it, it's a lie.

Equinox said:

---

Bill O’Reilly reveals the real reason Disney caved and put Jimmy Kimmel back on the air.

Hint: “It had nothing to do with freedom of speech at all.”

“The Journal today lays out what I said… the talent agencies in Los Angeles, all left wing, 100%, threatened Disney and Bob Iger… pic.twitter.com/GleF6pbAH9

— Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) September 30, 2025

---

Correct. See previous post about the 300 plus Hollywood radicals that threatened Disney.

That's not free market. That's inmates running the asylum. Disney could… take a stand but they remain way too woke for that.

FireAg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Gaslighting should be a bannable offense.

---

If it were, then a ton of Covid-era posters who beat our brains in about "follow the science", "mandate the jab", and "2 weeks to flatten the curve" would have been dismissed long ago…

One can only wish…

---

"Rumor, unconfirmed, false information"

Just don't call them a liar. Indicate their post contained false information and move on.

saw this objective post elsewhere.

Quote:

---

Jimmy Kimmel's suspension isn't just a culture-war flashpoint; it's a governance case study.

Disney's board is facing the kind of real-time risk calculus that many of us in governance roles recognize:
Affiliate revolt: Nexstar and others have already pulled the show.
Advertiser pressure: Sponsors don't want their brands tied to controversy.
Regulatory scrutiny: The FCC has weighed in, raising "public interest" questions.
Reputation risk: Disney's family brand and long-term trust are at stake.

The board's fiduciary duty is clear: they must protect shareholder value, brand integrity, and stakeholder trust, even when that means taking tough action against a star talent.

This isn't about whether one agrees with Jimmy Kimmel. It's about how directors respond when high-profile figures put the enterprise at risk.

If you were advising Disney's board today, what path forward would you recommend:
Reinstatement with apology?
Prolonged suspension?
A clean break via negotiated settlement?

---

they chose to submit to the hollywood rot and do nothing.

but there was no 1A under attack.

flown-the-coop said:

---

Equinox said:

---

Bill O’Reilly reveals the real reason Disney caved and put Jimmy Kimmel back on the air.

Hint: “It had nothing to do with freedom of speech at all.”

“The Journal today lays out what I said… the talent agencies in Los Angeles, all left wing, 100%, threatened Disney and Bob Iger… pic.twitter.com/GleF6pbAH9

— Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) September 30, 2025

---

Correct. See previous post about the 300 plus Hollywood radicals that threatened Disney.

That's not free market. That's inmates running the asylum. Disney could… take a stand but they remain way too woke for that.

---

I'm not even sure I believe this story. After all, Disney is the expert in "make believe". Furthermore, in six months, some of those 300 would be looking for a payday and wouldn't care about their position on Kimi.

yeah, but they're all brainwashed to think that fighting to defend Kimmel's vile lies and bad humor means they're leading the resistance against fascist authoritarian dictatorship to save our democracy.

What's laughable is all the gnashing of teeth when Colbert gets cancelled and Kimmel gets cancelled (briefly) claiming its Trump, but they wouldn't be cancelled if the Democrats actually watched their own. 99% of political guests on their shows, Fallons, Meyers, Stewarts have been Democrat. They are de facto propaganda outlets for Democrat policies and politics, yet their ratings are terrible.

Dan Carlin said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

You know what I find offensive? That Charlie Kirk was assassinated. That Donald Trump was shot in the ear. That another guy was preparing to take him out. The rhetoric has and continues to be over the top from the left and here you are advocating the continued violent speech, which has led to unthinkable hatred and violence. Stop it. Stop it.

---

What is "violent speech" and how have I advocated for it?

IMO "violent speech" is the president of the United States using a horrible murder perpetrated by a deranged individual to to cast aspersion on all his political opponents.

---

Go away, troll

My big hope is that Kimmel is now tarnished, toxic etc. enough to be not worth the hassle at contract renewal time. He may have won the battle but will lose the war once things quiet down. He'll go away, just on their timetable, not ours.

Wildmen03 said:

---

I was pretty plugged into the news that day and I swear the timeline went like this.

1. Sinclair preempts Kimmel
2. FCC admin then backs them up saying Kimmel was spreading false information about the shooter and his violent rhetoric and lies don't belong on public airwaves
3. Trump then chimes in about Kimmel being a hack and that he was glad he was gone.

And all I hear from the left is that it started with Trump and went backwards from there.

---

Judging by the many blue stars, NOW we all believe when the news and government tell us how it happened.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

You know what I find offensive? That Charlie Kirk was assassinated. That Donald Trump was shot in the ear. That another guy was preparing to take him out. The rhetoric has and continues to be over the top from the left and here you are advocating the continued violent speech, which has led to unthinkable hatred and violence. Stop it. Stop it.

---

Violent speech. LOL

You know what leads to violence? Diametrically opposed radicals. Two sides unwilling to compromise.

agent-maroon said:

---

Quote:

---

HOWEVER, one day you're gonna shoot your mouth off, having become so emboldened on forums/ social media to make bombastic claims &/or spew proven lies that you no longer use a filter; I'm afraid on such an occasion someone will finally have enough & meet you & your Leftist friends' calls for violence with a solid uppercut to your chin that'll immediately drop your ass to the floor like a sack of potatoes!!

---

Trying to remember a social situation where anything of the sort was said out loud by a conservative/Republican/right-leaning individual in mixed company and can't recall a single incident. But I couldn't begin to count the number of times that I've suffered a liberal raising their voice and going off on some misinformed gaslighting diatribe. "Proof by belligerent assertion" is very much a liberal thing in my experience.

But thanks for sharing your violent fantasies about what you would wish on someone with an opposing viewpoint. Speaks volumes...

---

I'm confused, are you angry with Ag in Tiger Country or who they were responding to?

Liberalism cheered on by people without moral bounds. Over and over and over.

Welp... you're not as confused about my reply as I am right now. I genuinely thought that it was a lefty threatening conservatives and calling them "authoritarians", but now I see that it was (I think) a response to lefty calls for violence to be met with violence. I'm just sick of all the violent threats and just want people to stop acting on their violent fantasy/delusions. Probably shouldn't have responded or at least have waited until I had a full cup of coffee on board.

People shouldn't be dying or face violence for their political opinions and I want it to stop...

BREAKING: ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! has shed more than 70% of its key demographic audience since the host’s much-hyped return on September 23, per Fox News.

— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) October 7, 2025

So odd that staunch constitutionalists don't run around attacking people.

will25u said:

---

BREAKING: ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! has shed more than 70% of its key demographic audience since the host’s much-hyped return on September 23, per Fox News.

— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) October 7, 2025

---

I'm curious about the math on this. Is it 70% less than his audience on 9/23, or 70% less than his audience prior to being suspended? On 9/23 he had a huge audience, so that math could be a bit misleading if calculated against that night.

TheCurl84 said:

---

will25u said:

---

BREAKING: ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! has shed more than 70% of its key demographic audience since the host’s much-hyped return on September 23, per Fox News.

— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) October 7, 2025

---

I'm curious about the math on this. Is it 70% less than his audience on 9/23, or 70% less than his audience prior to being suspended? On 9/23 he had a huge audience, so that math could be a bit misleading if calculated against that night.

---

It says since his return, so 70% less than his return episode.

What age group is his "key demographic"? I bet his advertising revenue is hot garbage

agent-maroon said:

---

What age group is his "key demographic"? I bet his advertising revenue is hot garbage

---

Americans I'm guessing

agent-maroon said:

---

What age group is his "key demographic"?

---

I'm guessing communists and ritaards aged 35-70. Advertisers love selling to ritaards though.

I can't imagine people are routinely watching Kimmel. Has he ever been actually funny?

The late night "comedy" shows aren't meant to be funny. They're meant to spread propaganda and shape opinions.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

The late night "comedy" shows aren't meant to be funny. They're meant to spread propaganda and shape opinions.

---

As are 95 % of the commercials and programs on TV......especially the "shape opinions' part