***Official Early Vote Tracking***

192,786 Views | 1476 Replies | Last: 3 sec ago by FTAG 2000
Toptierag2018
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ryan the Temp said:

Captn_Ag05 said:


You can thank Trump demonizing mail ballots for the last six years for the reduction in Republican mail ballots..


Doesn't matter as long as they vote as expected on ED.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Just plugged the latest Arizona reports in.


Friday morning update from Arizona:



Republicans expand their lead another 20K and leading votes cast by over 8%. They are not also outpacing the Democrats on turnout for the first time. With a registration advantage of nearly 300,000 in Arizona now, obviously the gap will only grow in numbers in Republicans continue to keep pace or outpace Democrats in turnout.
Saturday update from Arizona



Republicans added to their lead again over Democrats and are now outvoting them by 183K votes. Republicans are also starting to get space in turnout, pushing their turnout advantage up to .9%. Democrats were turning out at a slightly higher rate until yesterday. As I mentioned in my update yesterday, with Republicans now having a nearly 300,000 registration advantage, it becomes very difficult to find a path to victory for Harris when the Republicans are also voting at a higher rate than Democrats.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another note on Arizona:

Arizona is a state that votes early traditionally, so you can tell more by looking at their 2020 data than maybe other states like Pennsylvania that voted so heavily by mail during Covid.

Look at the movement in Arizona. This is about 2/3 of the expected final vote. The remaining 1/3 will come on Election Day.

These things don't happen in isolation.

JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Enough to maybe get lake over the finish line?
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the final was +8 yes probably. 5 would be nail biter less and she loses probably. She is also the medias most hated candidate.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JDUB08AG said:

Enough to maybe get lake over the finish line?
If Republicans outvote Democrats on Tuesday, she may be able to eek out a win. I didn't think she had a chance a couple of weeks ago, but these numbers are eye opening. She has to hold on to more Republicans than polling shows her currently doing to win. She has also been getting absolutely smoked by independents in polling.

I am still a bit skeptical that there will be that many crossover Trump voters not voting for her, but she seems to be uniquely unpopular there.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captn_Ag05 said:

Another note on Arizona:

Arizona is a state that votes early traditionally, so you can tell more by looking at their 2020 data than maybe other states like Pennsylvania that voted so heavily by mail during Covid.

Look at the movement in Arizona. This is about 2/3 of the expected final vote. The remaining 1/3 will come on Election Day.

These things don't happen in isolation.



So in votes
R: 910K votes in 2020, 900k in 2024
D: 910k votes in 2020, 700k in 2024.

Yeah turnout is clearly favoring one side....
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kamala is a very weak candidate. Turnout will show it.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes and on the independents, you can study election cycle after election cycle. When one party is showing up in bigger numbers/higher rate, the independents that show up will also favor the party that is more enthused.

If Democrat loyalists aren't showing up, what would make someone think that less partisan independents that may lean Democrat are going to show up?
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Kamala is a very weak candidate. Turnout will show it.


I hope so. We said the same thing about Biden.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
outofstateaggie said:

Rockdoc said:

Kamala is a very weak candidate. Turnout will show it.


I hope so. We said the same thing about Biden.
Whos we
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So I think a lot of the EV data suggests Trump can possibly match or exceed his voting totals from 2020. Somebody correct me if that's wrong.

I've always felt like Kamala would get similar numbers that Clinton did... Maybe a bit better because of the Orange Man Bad people.

2020 (81 million votes) isn't happening again. If the Dems come back down to numbers similar to 2016 it's going to be the biggest blowout since 2008.

Isosceles_Kramer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
biden was weak, is weak, and was carried across by "secure mail in votes". Twitter suppresses information and any questions on validity. It was too late

X is wide open, and while some things are false, real discrepancies are being investigated.

Hold the line and let's show up Tuesday and take this baby home.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

So I think a lot of the EV data suggests Trump can possibly match or exceed his voting totals from 2020. Somebody correct me if that's wrong.
He will exceed his totals from 2020.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Isosceles_Kramer said:

biden was weak, is weak, and was carried across by "secure mail in votes". Twitter suppresses information and any questions on validity. It was too late

X is wide open, and while some things are false, real discrepancies are being investigated.

Hold the line and let's show up Tuesday and take this baby home.
Elon purchasing twitter likely saved this country. Not only does it continue to red pill thousands of potential voters but the ability to share critical information about precinct issues in real-time with no shadow-banning or other censorship is incredible.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Elon purchasing twitter likely saved this country. Not only does it continue to red pill thousands of potential voters but the ability to share critical information about precinct issues in real-time with no shadow-banning or other censorship is incredible.
Agree. Has been very helpful to the RNC and their legal teams to quickly respond.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jr15aggie said:

So I think a lot of the EV data suggests Trump can possibly match or exceed his voting totals from 2020. Somebody correct me if that's wrong.

I've always felt like Kamala would get similar numbers that Clinton did... Maybe a bit better because of the Orange Man Bad people.

2020 (81 million votes) isn't happening again. If the Dems come back down to numbers similar to 2016 it's going to be the biggest blowout since 2008.


This is my thought.

The only hope that Dems have is that EV is cannibalizing election day voting. But, the EV voters have a lot of low-turnout or first time voters.

All the tea leaves point to a pretty big blow out. But, we will see.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A woman in NJ wearing a MAGA T-shirt was told she could not vote in that clothing, so she took off the shirt and voted in her bra.

I will not post pictures, and Google at your own peril.
PA24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
outofstateaggie said:

Rockdoc said:

Kamala is a very weak candidate. Turnout will show it.


I hope so. We said the same thing about Biden.
and he was, the harvesting of Urban America using the drop boxes were not watched
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

A woman in NJ wearing a MAGA T-shirt was told she could not vote in that clothing, so she took off the shirt and voted in her bra.

I will not post pictures, and Google at your own peril.
I think that picture was actually on this thread and I made the point that she was likely one of the first time voters who had no idea about the rules. It looks like there were a LOT of them in the swing states so it helps R's build a lead (or keep it much closer than normal) and then blow them out on ED when R's traditionally outvote D's.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Republicans have now cast 877,000 more ballots than Democrats in Florida.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Toptierag2018
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:

Isosceles_Kramer said:

biden was weak, is weak, and was carried across by "secure mail in votes". Twitter suppresses information and any questions on validity. It was too late

X is wide open, and while some things are false, real discrepancies are being investigated.

Hold the line and let's show up Tuesday and take this baby home.
Elon purchasing twitter likely saved this country. Not only does it continue to red pill thousands of potential voters but the ability to share critical information about precinct issues in real-time with no shadow-banning or other censorship is incredible.


Yep, millions of Americans would have had no idea any of these voting issues (or even some of these success lawsuits) even existed.
Toptierag2018
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PA24 said:

outofstateaggie said:

Rockdoc said:

Kamala is a very weak candidate. Turnout will show it.


I hope so. We said the same thing about Biden.
and he was, the harvesting of Urban America using the drop boxes were not watched


Biden was run as a "moderate" and the candidate to make things "normal" again.

Kamala is the opposite of both things.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

A woman in NJ wearing a MAGA T-shirt was told she could not vote in that clothing, so she took off the shirt and voted in her bra.

I will not post pictures, and Google at your own peril.
Good for her.

But, that is election law. Biden T-shirt would probably be turned away as well.
Z3phyr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there any data showing an change on young male turnout since that seems to have been a big part of Trumps strategy doing the podcast circuit?
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:








So it leads to the question, what was the total ED voting between R/D in 2020?

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:






Wasn't 33% return for Rs in PA supposed to be bordering on blowout territory for Trump. I know earlier on this thread someone said Trump would likely win the state at 30%, comfortably win at 31-32% and 33% would be blowout beyond margin of cheating type territory. Hope that's true.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MemphisAg1 said:

Interesting.

40% of his final rallies in NC
30% in PA
10% in MI

Nothing in WI

That would lead one to believe NC is still up for grabs.
My observation going back several election cycles in NC. CM/unaffiliated voter always look for balance in how they vote, a combination of both Ds and Rs.

Robinson is toast, they're not going to vote for him. There is a high probability they will vote for Trump to even things out in their minds. Especially with a candidate like Kamala.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Any word on Iowa?
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blowout is too strong. Comfortable win with comparable election day voting. We won't know those full details for hours after they close. It should be a Trump win by a couple hundred thousand based on these results so far. But we're a long way from done. Make calls and texts tomorrow, keep pounding.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

Any word on Iowa?


SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

samurai_science said:

Any word on Iowa?




I'm sorry, but that looks like Harris +3 to me.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe even 5.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.