2020 vs 2024 Protected Demographics of Electorate;
— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) October 23, 2024
2020:
White: 67%
Black: 13%
Hispanic: 13%
2024:
White: 71%
Black: 11%
Hispanic: 11%
The early voting blog is updated!
— Jon Ralston (@RalstonReports) October 23, 2024
Statewide: R+12,000, or 3.5 percent
Clark firewall: 7,000
Rural firewall: 16,500
GOP maintaining lead, all about how 80K indies are voting.https://t.co/Pl43XBMcPA https://t.co/w6VhnzvK4J
How do they know this?TheBonifaceOption said:Ive listened to an analyst and he answered it this way.agracer said:
Does the number of early voters matter that much as this thread seems to be suggesting (a huge GOP swing)?
I never voted early until the 2016 election. It's just more convenient than the lines on election day. 10-minutes each time I've done it (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022) vs 45-60m in person day of. Wife is the same.
My dad is the same. He always voted on election day and now votes early every election cycle.
I also recall hearing that Dems voted early and my mail in far higher numbers than GOP for a long time. Is this simply the GOP voters have shifted more to early voting than in previous elections?
If you are a 4-for-4 voter (last 4 elections say "22,20,18,16") you are considered a "high propensity voter". You are like 95% likely that you are going to vote, regardless of when, so it dont matter.
The "miracle" this election is that Trump is turning out the low propensity voter and new voters, they are showing up to vote early as well. The more they show up early, the more time and $ Trump can spend going after the less enthusiastic.
Date of voter registration and follow my ballot apps that show they have voted.Quote:
How do they know this?
Are the states releasing data indicating that they have a lot of 'new' GOP/DEM voters?
Just curious.
Both parties have lists of registered voters and know who voted in other previous elections. Those that haven't voted recently or who were registered recently are ranked a "low propensity", while folks who vote every election are considered "high propensity". When the SOS releases their records from early voting, they can cross reference those lists against their rankings of those voters to see who is turning out.agracer said:How do they know this?TheBonifaceOption said:Ive listened to an analyst and he answered it this way.agracer said:
Does the number of early voters matter that much as this thread seems to be suggesting (a huge GOP swing)?
I never voted early until the 2016 election. It's just more convenient than the lines on election day. 10-minutes each time I've done it (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022) vs 45-60m in person day of. Wife is the same.
My dad is the same. He always voted on election day and now votes early every election cycle.
I also recall hearing that Dems voted early and my mail in far higher numbers than GOP for a long time. Is this simply the GOP voters have shifted more to early voting than in previous elections?
If you are a 4-for-4 voter (last 4 elections say "22,20,18,16") you are considered a "high propensity voter". You are like 95% likely that you are going to vote, regardless of when, so it dont matter.
The "miracle" this election is that Trump is turning out the low propensity voter and new voters, they are showing up to vote early as well. The more they show up early, the more time and $ Trump can spend going after the less enthusiastic.
Are the states releasing data indicating that they have a lot of 'new' GOP/DEM voters?
Just curious.
agracer said:How do they know this?TheBonifaceOption said:Ive listened to an analyst and he answered it this way.agracer said:
Does the number of early voters matter that much as this thread seems to be suggesting (a huge GOP swing)?
I never voted early until the 2016 election. It's just more convenient than the lines on election day. 10-minutes each time I've done it (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022) vs 45-60m in person day of. Wife is the same.
My dad is the same. He always voted on election day and now votes early every election cycle.
I also recall hearing that Dems voted early and my mail in far higher numbers than GOP for a long time. Is this simply the GOP voters have shifted more to early voting than in previous elections?
If you are a 4-for-4 voter (last 4 elections say "22,20,18,16") you are considered a "high propensity voter". You are like 95% likely that you are going to vote, regardless of when, so it dont matter.
The "miracle" this election is that Trump is turning out the low propensity voter and new voters, they are showing up to vote early as well. The more they show up early, the more time and $ Trump can spend going after the less enthusiastic.
Are the states releasing data indicating that they have a lot of 'new' GOP/DEM voters?
Just curious.
TheBonifaceOption said:TheBonifaceOption said:
County in central Texas. Been in line for an hour. About halfway done.
Sherrifs Deputy said it's been this bad all day.
One of the locations in the county (reddest) ran out of ballots, county seat running ballots out there on the regular.
1h45m from back of the line to receiving ballot. Line still around the block in 90F heat.
If he can take a bullet, people can endure an uncomfortable afternoon
TheBonifaceOption said:Yes and no.LMCane said:that simply is not true.akm91 said:
Holy Chit! 1M buffer just in early voting for Trump in FL? If that mirrors the enthusiasm gap in battleground states, it is going to be a blowout win for Trump.
It's like stating that Trump will win West Virginia by 35 points so he will have a blowout nationally.
it's ONE STATE OUT OF 50 and not a battleground state
if it was Georgia or Pennsylvania your point would have merit-
it doesn't matter if we win Florida by 2 points or 15 points.
If Trump is attractive to a large state, say Florida, by "70%" that means his appeal is transcending and trouncing Harris. Does it mean he will win Georgia to the north at 70/30? No, but the idea that the brand that is 30% in Florida is really 50%+1 in Georgia is unlikely.
There is a chance Trump actually wins the popular vote this year if Texas and Florida run it up, (as well as Dems disengaging in CA & NY). The momentum is red right now, and all the "October surprises" have been unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims. The landscape is set, short of a geopolitical event (war) which doesnt favor the 5'2" woman.
SwigAg11 said:
The "October surprises" have not simply been unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims, but are directly refuted by those who were physically present. The insane lying by the media on this is dumbfounding to me, though admittedly, I view honesty as one of the most important qualities someone can have.
The Democrats are running scared at the moment. Kamala is sending her supporters emails with panicked tones attempting to get her base to the polls.gigemJTH12 said:
is there any pro-democrat news coming out that is actually credible??
I am treating this whole election with a pessimistic attitude because I believe they will cheat. So I am not letting myself get excited until I see him swearing in.
but is there any real info coming out thats concerning?
Kellso said:The Democrats are running scared at the moment. Kamala is sending her supporters emails with panicked tones attempting to get her base to the polls.gigemJTH12 said:
is there any pro-democrat news coming out that is actually credible??
I am treating this whole election with a pessimistic attitude because I believe they will cheat. So I am not letting myself get excited until I see him swearing in.
but is there any real info coming out thats concerning?
Trump has done a masterful job of embracing early voting in this years election cycle. Team Trump is up at the moment, but Kamala still has the next two weeks to try and comeback.
Make no mistake about it....Kamala is the underdog. She face a mighty uphill climb to defeat Trump because of how enthusiastic his supporters are to vote for him.
Early election returns show that the excitement in the inner city just isn't there for Kamala like there was for Joe Biden.
The one silver lining for Team Kamala is that an un-enthusiastic voters vote is worth the same as someone that is enthusiastic.
Arizona Early Voting Update - 10.23
— Michael Pruser (@MichaelPruser) October 23, 2024
With 900k votes in, Republicans are beginning to flex their registration advantage. Current turnout through this morning:
🔴Republicans - 376,348
🔵Democrats - 321,495
🟡Others - 199,005
When looking at the frequency of Arizona voters,… pic.twitter.com/lwPyE8Dfwh
Returns from every county* this morning. Maricopa (148k) and Pima (23k) top the lists. Other counties and link below. GOP advantage grew to 55k. Dems maintain TO lead
— Sam Almy (@sfalmy) October 23, 2024
Total: 897k
🔵: 321k🔴: 376k⚫: 199k
Turnout: 20.7%
🔵: 25.6% 🔴: 24.4% ⚫: 13%
Adv 🔴+38k Ballots |🔵+1.3% TO pic.twitter.com/kWximcbY73
OH MY GOD.
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 23, 2024
Republicans lead the Miami-Dade early voting by over 15 points.
I am speechless. pic.twitter.com/8BxHDnMZDi
PENNSYLVANIA: Republicans out-requested mail-in ballots again! https://t.co/99yEXFdeU3
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 23, 2024
Actually, Mitt Romney won independents nationally 50% to 45%, and lost, too.https://t.co/8ciD9F2mF4 https://t.co/BJzrvGrsQc
— Rich Baris The People's Pundit (@Peoples_Pundit) October 23, 2024
BREAKING: Nate Silver predicts that Donald Trump will win the 2024 election.
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 23, 2024
"My gut says Donald Trump. And my guess is that it is true for many anxious Democrats."
will25u said:BREAKING: Nate Silver predicts that Donald Trump will win the 2024 election.
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 23, 2024
"My gut says Donald Trump. And my guess is that it is true for many anxious Democrats."
From what I understand, the results in Duval County in FL are a leading indicator of what will happen in GA and maybe NC based on election history. And Duval County is R+0.8 in mail and early voting. So there's that.LMCane said:TheBonifaceOption said:Yes and no.LMCane said:that simply is not true.akm91 said:
Holy Chit! 1M buffer just in early voting for Trump in FL? If that mirrors the enthusiasm gap in battleground states, it is going to be a blowout win for Trump.
It's like stating that Trump will win West Virginia by 35 points so he will have a blowout nationally.
it's ONE STATE OUT OF 50 and not a battleground state
if it was Georgia or Pennsylvania your point would have merit-
it doesn't matter if we win Florida by 2 points or 15 points.
If Trump is attractive to a large state, say Florida, by "70%" that means his appeal is transcending and trouncing Harris. Does it mean he will win Georgia to the north at 70/30? No, but the idea that the brand that is 30% in Florida is really 50%+1 in Georgia is unlikely.
There is a chance Trump actually wins the popular vote this year if Texas and Florida run it up, (as well as Dems disengaging in CA & NY). The momentum is red right now, and all the "October surprises" have been unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims. The landscape is set, short of a geopolitical event (war) which doesnt favor the 5'2" woman.
correct- obviously it is better to win by 15 than to lose by 15
but my point is that one can not extrapolate winning a national election based on ONE state's returns
The current tracker shows Miami Dade early vote as +11K D not Rakm91 said:
Miami Dade early voting is +11K R which more than overcomes both Broward (-7K R) and Orange (-3K R) combined!
Assuming 50/50 split of Independents (which is rather generous)
As of 10/23 8 am.
FL Early Voting Results
As a statistician, I approve this message.Squadron7 said:
Anecdotal, but I am standing in the longest early voting line I've ever experienced in my very red burg.
that's no bueno, is it?Gyles Marrett said:The current tracker shows Miami Dade early vote as +11K D not Rakm91 said:
Miami Dade early voting is +11K R which more than overcomes both Broward (-7K R) and Orange (-3K R) combined!
Assuming 50/50 split of Independents (which is rather generous)
As of 10/23 8 am.
FL Early Voting Results
Here's some context to understand why it's such a big deal for Clark County, NV to be so close.
— Victor Joecks (@VictorJoecks) October 23, 2024
In 2014, Ds outvoted Rs in Clark by <3K voters. And Rs won virtually everything. They swept the statewide offices, a congressional seat they had no business winning and controlled… https://t.co/vdanuvUUV7 pic.twitter.com/GSwAEaDZT3
AgCMT said:
When will we start to see numbers for Texas?
Quote:
The number of Texans who showed up at the polls on the first day of early voting is up at least 15% over that for the 2020 presidential election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
At least 870,000 people cast a ballot Monday, surpassing 2020s opening day by over 87,000, though some counties are still reporting their tallies, according to Texas Secretary of State data.
Quote:
Still, state data shows record-high first-day early voting presidential election numbers around North Texas boosted the statewide tally. But that wasn't the case in Dallas County, where numbers dipped below those for 2020 and 2016.
Dallas County officials reported 56,074 voters cast ballots on Monday. According to the state, that's fewer than the 60,573 voters who went to the polls in person on the first day of early voting in October 2020 and 58,775 voters in October 2016.
Collin County reported seeing 43,398 voters, more than the 39,469 in 2020 and 31,283 in 2016. There were 49,813 voters who showed up Monday in Denton County, compared with 36,040 in 2020 and 16,936 in 2016. In Tarrant County, 58,247 people voted Monday, more than the 42,351 in 2020 and 43,149 in 2016.