Dude did you see Signs? They would not be taking on water,
Is UFO Secrecy Crumbling?
358,745 Views |
2379 Replies |
Last: 15 days ago by Stat Monitor Repairman
That awful movie was on yesterday.
Less believable than their aliens was Phoenix's 507ft dinger (with the batting stance & swing of an old lady).
The end was anticlimactic and sucked, as well.
Add: WTF...
Less believable than their aliens was Phoenix's 507ft dinger (with the batting stance & swing of an old lady).
The end was anticlimactic and sucked, as well.
Add: WTF...
Swing away!
I saw it in the theater. I still remember the scene where the family was watching TV news, and the reporter said, "we're going to show you a video of an alien." Even though we all knew it was coming, I heard people gasp in the theater when it appeared.
This is one of the more surreal listens I've had in a long time. There are times when it seems like they're talking about current/recent events, but then they start talking about Clinton, Shoemaker-Levy, and $199 cordless phones.
Espionage, traitors, lying to keep your entire family alive, etc...it's got it all. There are audio hiccups, but overall it's 9/10 road trip material. Just more proof of the forever long cover-up, really. The background video may be NSFW (Fortnite game, I believe).
Espionage, traitors, lying to keep your entire family alive, etc...it's got it all. There are audio hiccups, but overall it's 9/10 road trip material. Just more proof of the forever long cover-up, really. The background video may be NSFW (Fortnite game, I believe).
peacedude said:
This is one of the more surreal listens I've had in a long time. There are times when it seems like they're talking about current/recent events, but then they start talking about Clinton, Shoemaker-Levy, and $199 cordless phones.
Espionage, traitors, lying to keep your entire family alive, etc...it's got it all. There are audio hiccups, but overall it's 9/10 road trip material. Just more proof of the forever long cover-up, really. The background video may be NSFW (Fortnite game, I believe).
Wtf did I just spend 6 min of my life listening to? What year was that program live? It sounds like it's from the mid 90s
Comet ShoemakerLevy 9 (formally designated D/1993 F2) broke apart in July 1992 and collided with Jupiter in July 1994...
*Cordless Phone*
*Audio Hiccups*
~6-7 of them (30 seconds at times), so suck it up. There are things they don't want being discussed, and it seems as if someone's gone back to Frankenstein a copy of the interview. When they talk of people not being able to handle it (religious zealots, stupid ppl), they're serious & that's for a reason. They do cover the religious angle nicely, which should be applauded.
*Cordless Phone*
*Audio Hiccups*
~6-7 of them (30 seconds at times), so suck it up. There are things they don't want being discussed, and it seems as if someone's gone back to Frankenstein a copy of the interview. When they talk of people not being able to handle it (religious zealots, stupid ppl), they're serious & that's for a reason. They do cover the religious angle nicely, which should be applauded.
Just found this link, so figured I'd share it for those with an interest.
https://archive.org/details/artbellshows (80+ episodes)
Also, here's another link to the Frankensteined interview up above (from '94): https://archive.org/details/19940703DreamlandWithArtBellMichaelLindemannAliensAncientKnowledgeColdWar
https://archive.org/details/artbellshows (80+ episodes)
Also, here's another link to the Frankensteined interview up above (from '94): https://archive.org/details/19940703DreamlandWithArtBellMichaelLindemannAliensAncientKnowledgeColdWar
Very interesting to have the US Space Command & Space Force to fess up:
https://dnyuz.com/2022/04/15/military-memo-deepens-mystery-of-possible-interstellar-visitor-to-earth/
"We had thought this was a lost cause," said one of the researchers, Amir Siraj, a Harvard undergraduate student studying astrophysics. Without the more thorough data, he conceded, it was difficult "to figure out whether the object was truly interstellar or not."
But, it turned out, the truth was out there. Last month, the U.S. Space Command released a memo to NASA scientists that stated the data from the missile warning satellites' sensors "was sufficiently accurate to indicate an interstellar trajectory" for the meteor. The publication of the memo was the culmination of a three-year effort by Mr. Siraj and a well-known Harvard astronomer, Avi Loeb.
Cool: Not Oumuamua, but it's the same researcher (Loeb).
https://dnyuz.com/2022/04/15/military-memo-deepens-mystery-of-possible-interstellar-visitor-to-earth/
"We had thought this was a lost cause," said one of the researchers, Amir Siraj, a Harvard undergraduate student studying astrophysics. Without the more thorough data, he conceded, it was difficult "to figure out whether the object was truly interstellar or not."
But, it turned out, the truth was out there. Last month, the U.S. Space Command released a memo to NASA scientists that stated the data from the missile warning satellites' sensors "was sufficiently accurate to indicate an interstellar trajectory" for the meteor. The publication of the memo was the culmination of a three-year effort by Mr. Siraj and a well-known Harvard astronomer, Avi Loeb.
Cool: Not Oumuamua, but it's the same researcher (Loeb).
Signs is a good movie. It's a movie about faith that is disguised as a sci fi suspense flick. I enjoyed it.
Using a technique developed by the CIA and Stanford Research Institute for military espionage purposes.
Fascinating data collected here.
Our state had a significant event as well...
Where spydey when you need him
I feel like he's still with us.
He's listening to "Power" on a constant loop.Ghost of Bizbee said:
Where spydey when you need him
howdyGhost of Bizbee said:
Where spydey when you need him
Reminder: $$$Trillions just got printed (again), and humans are so smart, innovative and genius that we came up with ALL this on our own.
LMAO.
After a three year break for improvements, it's ba'ack to monitor the next round of encounters...
https://www.cnet.com/science/what-is-the-large-hadron-collider-cern-restarts-the-worlds-largest-particle-accelerator/
LMAO.
After a three year break for improvements, it's ba'ack to monitor the next round of encounters...
https://www.cnet.com/science/what-is-the-large-hadron-collider-cern-restarts-the-worlds-largest-particle-accelerator/
Serpo is a controversial topic.Viper16 said:
X-File.........Do you believe it?
This is far from accurate. Far, fortunately..ProgN said:He's listening to "Power" on a constant loop.Ghost of Bizbee said:
Where spydey when you need him
I know, you know me, I just had to poke the bear.McKelveysCurse said:This is far from accurate. Far, fortunately..ProgN said:He's listening to "Power" on a constant loop.Ghost of Bizbee said:
Where spydey when you need him
Very controversial!!
If 5% is true….it would still be amazing!
If 5% is true….it would still be amazing!
Lex Talionis.......Ordo Seclorum
Yeah, I know all about poking that bear. But if you want to effect change, sometimes you must do it. Just pull up the lyrics..ProgN said:I know, you know me, I just had to poke the bear.McKelveysCurse said:This is far from accurate. Far, fortunately..ProgN said:He's listening to "Power" on a constant loop.Ghost of Bizbee said:
Where spydey when you need him
I'm on your side man, I was just ****ing with you.McKelveysCurse said:Yeah, I know all about poking that bear. But if you want to effect change, sometimes you must do it. Just pull up the lyrics..ProgN said:I know, you know me, I just had to poke the bear.McKelveysCurse said:This is far from accurate. Far, fortunately..ProgN said:He's listening to "Power" on a constant loop.Ghost of Bizbee said:
Where spydey when you need him
> Is UFO Secrecy Crumbling?
This thread is almost 3 years old. I think the question is now "Did UFO Secrecy Crumble?"
This thread is almost 3 years old. I think the question is now "Did UFO Secrecy Crumble?"
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Fight! Fight! Fight!
I think it is. The question should be: when will the mainstream media give us all permission to believe this reality? They've been good soldiers now going on 75yrs of the cover-up. Some things take time I suppose.TexAgs91 said:
> Is UFO Secrecy Crumbling?
This thread is almost 3 years old. I think the question is now "Did UFO Secrecy Crumble?"
But do we need MSM permission to easily connect a few dots?
McKelveysCurse said:I think it is. The question should be: when will the mainstream media give us all permission to believe this reality? They've been good soldiers now going on 75yrs of the cover-up. Some things take time I suppose.TexAgs91 said:
> Is UFO Secrecy Crumbling?
This thread is almost 3 years old. I think the question is now "Did UFO Secrecy Crumble?"
But do we need MSM permission to easily connect a few dots?
National Enquirer has aliens, no permission needed.
Remote viewing doesn't stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. Upon review, the CIA concluded that remote viewing was not real and could not provide actionable intelligence. Accusations have been made that the original reports were changed by the project manager afterwards. The SRI experiments by Puthoff and Targ were flawed in design and have not been replicated. When the subject or judge can guess the remote viewing target by inadvertent (or intentional) cues provided during the session, it becomes impossible to take these experiments seriously as proof of anything. In this video, the performer even knows exactly what he's supposed to be viewing: a crashed disc at Roswell! This isn't data. It's just daydreaming.McKelveysCurse said:
Using a technique developed by the CIA and Stanford Research Institute for military espionage purposes.
Fascinating data collected here.
Not mainstream. But NE has gone where others apparently are afraid to go...kudoes NE.TRADUCTOR said:McKelveysCurse said:I think it is. The question should be: when will the mainstream media give us all permission to believe this reality? They've been good soldiers now going on 75yrs of the cover-up. Some things take time I suppose.TexAgs91 said:
> Is UFO Secrecy Crumbling?
This thread is almost 3 years old. I think the question is now "Did UFO Secrecy Crumble?"
But do we need MSM permission to easily connect a few dots?
National Enquirer has aliens, no permission needed.
https://www.theufochronicles.com/2022/04/historic-rendezvous-transformed-ufo.html?m=1
Interesting article. The dots are there...
That's what they (gov) said at the end of Project Bluebook. And we know that was a lie. The study of ET continues to this day. The data suggests not only is the CIA not being straight concerning this technique, but that it is a legit tool. We are still using this technique as are other countries around the planet. Just like smell, sight, taste....we don't understand the nuts and bolts but..someday we will.G Martin 87 said:Remote viewing doesn't stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. Upon review, the CIA concluded that remote viewing was not real and could not provide actionable intelligence. Accusations have been made that the original reports were changed by the project manager afterwards. The SRI experiments by Puthoff and Targ were flawed in design and have not been replicated. When the subject or judge can guess the remote viewing target by inadvertent (or intentional) cues provided during the session, it becomes impossible to take these experiments seriously as proof of anything. In this video, the performer even knows exactly what he's supposed to be viewing: a crashed disc at Roswell! This isn't data. It's just daydreaming.McKelveysCurse said:
Using a technique developed by the CIA and Stanford Research Institute for military espionage purposes.
Fascinating data collected here.
I would suggest you view this documentary. You may find you were the one believing the nonsense: It won't be easy...I know, trust me. I would also suggest that Dr. Brown and his team at Farsight have tweaked things...not perfected, but modified Targs original protocols.
Did you view the data presented in the Roswell video?
Your adult discussion is appreciated. A breath of fresh air for sure.
https://arielphenomenon.com/product/pay-per-view-ariel-phenomenon-stream/
Looks like the film finally got some backing and will be released later in May.
If these children can't change the hearts of our kind...we may not much of a chance.
Looks like the film finally got some backing and will be released later in May.
If these children can't change the hearts of our kind...we may not much of a chance.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/ufo-briefings-congress-pentagon-00029315?fbclid=IwAR2YvrG_ip2-P520-UnbhgUPvy07EyTQ3evOE6fUUZlhktjNgEbUs2qyI6s
Of course they are going to resist...stonewall etc. etc. The last thing the Pentagon and DOD want to deal with is the 75yr on going ET cover-up.
Of course they are going to resist...stonewall etc. etc. The last thing the Pentagon and DOD want to deal with is the 75yr on going ET cover-up.
What data?McKelveysCurse said:That's what they (gov) said at the end of Project Bluebook. And we know that was a lie. The study of ET continues to this day. The data suggests not only is the CIA not being straight concerning this technique, but that it is a legit tool. We are still using this technique as are other countries around the planet. Just like smell, sight, taste....we don't understand the nuts and bolts but..someday we will.G Martin 87 said:Remote viewing doesn't stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. Upon review, the CIA concluded that remote viewing was not real and could not provide actionable intelligence. Accusations have been made that the original reports were changed by the project manager afterwards. The SRI experiments by Puthoff and Targ were flawed in design and have not been replicated. When the subject or judge can guess the remote viewing target by inadvertent (or intentional) cues provided during the session, it becomes impossible to take these experiments seriously as proof of anything. In this video, the performer even knows exactly what he's supposed to be viewing: a crashed disc at Roswell! This isn't data. It's just daydreaming.McKelveysCurse said:
Using a technique developed by the CIA and Stanford Research Institute for military espionage purposes.
Fascinating data collected here.
I would suggest you view this documentary. You may find you were the one believing the nonsense: It won't be easy...I know, trust me. I would also suggest that Dr. Brown and his team at Farsight have tweaked things...not perfected, but modified Targs original protocols.
Did you view the data presented in the Roswell video?
Your adult discussion is appreciated. A breath of fresh air for sure.
Get help