Check out The Watch, they do a pretty good breakdown.
evan_aggie said:
Fosters screenplay/dialogue is just so hard to buy into. I don't think she'd ever be a real person, and it's been very shallow through two episodes.
evan_aggie said:
I had been thinking about this more and based on some of the previous theories..
It actually starts to add up that the micro-organisms are causing people to act strange and/or seem to kill themselves. The bleeding from the ears, and scratch of the eyes.
Even the death of Annie may be explained by: she got infected, went insane / psycho and she was stabbed 60 times out of fear and kicked after she was dead to MAKE SURE she was dead.
ShockerTCTTS said:
"You know what I mean?" - Joanna, nervously, 20 times per podcast
I hear you. While not outwardly spoken in her liberal-ness, there's just something about the way she constantly walks on eggshells, re: anything even remotely controversial/woke, that rubs me the wrong way.
That said, she does seem like a genuinely nice person and I do appreciate her dedication/deep dives.
I honestly have been kind of let down with her acting personally, but still enjoying this show and excited to see where it goes and hoping it doesn't let me down.Ag_07 said:evan_aggie said:
Fosters screenplay/dialogue is just so hard to buy into. I don't think she'd ever be a real person, and it's been very shallow through two episodes.
Hmm...Interesting
I think the point is to make her shallow. She's a shallow person. And that's not too far fetched for a cop especially one who lost her family and is now living in a desolate town with no sunlight.
Someone posted about this earlier but I don't think it's too unbelievable to have the female cop have a shallow, hardened, cold, callous personality.
Did Hank send a pic of his son when asked to send more photos by the "Russian" on the other end of the text?fig96 said:
Catching up on all this, I've learned a ton reading this thread and had missed the whole Travis/Rust thing which is crazy
Only note to add is that (as has been mentioned) I definitely feel like there's some more backstory to Hank/Peter that's going to tie in. The Russian bride thing is interesting too, really curious if that's going to provide more clues or is just an illustration of Hank's character flaws.
That's basically how I feel, too. They've done a good job of making the setting feel very cold, dark, and depressing, but that's about the extent of my compliments. The acting and dialogue have been bad. I'm not sure why, but the scene with the geologist talking to Foster felt Gran Torino-level bad acting. This week's episode felt like it was two hours.Gap said:
2 of 6 episodes down and this series has been a let down for me. I want to like it and have committed to watching it, but it has been a disappointment so far. In fact, so far, I put it at the bottom of the entire series including season 2 - ranking 1, 3, 2, 4.
The setting is cool. But I don't think the actors have been very good including Foster or maybe it is the dialogue they have been given. But basically, dull acting with little chemistry. And they haven't given me enough on the mystery to be deeply involved for the story to overcome the acting.
TCTTS said:
This is the exact kind of sh*t Rust used to say, and we loved him for it. Hell, he probably got a lot of that from his dad, which rubbed off on Rose too.
IMO, these bad acting/dialogue takes feel a little too nitpicky - and I couldn't disagree more - but to each their own.
TCTTS said:
This is the exact kind of sh*t Rust used to say, and we loved him for it. Hell, he probably got a lot of that from his dad, which rubbed off on Rose too.
IMO, these bad acting/dialogue takes feel a little too nitpicky - and I couldn't disagree more - but to each their own.
FL_Ag1998 said:TCTTS said:
This is the exact kind of sh*t Rust used to say, and we loved him for it. Hell, he probably got a lot of that from his dad, which rubbed off on Rose too.
IMO, these bad acting/dialogue takes feel a little too nitpicky - and I couldn't disagree more - but to each their own.
Unfortunately, after Season 1 this show was always destined to never be able to live up to the precedent most people set in their heads. No matter how good following seasons were, some viewers were always going to insist that every season match the first, which is impossible because the first season has no bar to meet. No expectations. No feelings of "been here, done this". So the first season will always be memorable in a way no following season could be and some viewers will always let that skew their opinion.
I think the nitpicky overanalyzing of this season after only two episodes is simply a reflection of that attitude. No season will ever completely equal season 1 nor will any partnership ever equal Marty and Rust, but I really like this season so far.
KidDoc said:
We did a rewatch of Season 1 once we started to see all the call backs in S4. It is an outstanding second watch.
agreed with both takes. I will finish watching it, but I am not enjoying it at all.Seven Costanza said:That's basically how I feel, too. They've done a good job of making the setting feel very cold, dark, and depressing, but that's about the extent of my compliments. The acting and dialogue have been bad. I'm not sure why, but the scene with the geologist talking to Foster felt Gran Torino-level bad acting. This week's episode felt like it was two hours.Gap said:
2 of 6 episodes down and this series has been a let down for me. I want to like it and have committed to watching it, but it has been a disappointment so far. In fact, so far, I put it at the bottom of the entire series including season 2 - ranking 1, 3, 2, 4.
The setting is cool. But I don't think the actors have been very good including Foster or maybe it is the dialogue they have been given. But basically, dull acting with little chemistry. And they haven't given me enough on the mystery to be deeply involved for the story to overcome the acting.
Some of the dialogue cracks me up:
"What does the circle thing mean?"
*looks in another direction* "It's old. Older than Ennis. Probably older than the ice."
I wanted to cop to say "So just to be clear, you don't know what it is or what it means?"
"No, I was just being dramatic. But it's probably bad."