*** SUCCESSION - Season 3 ***

95,283 Views | 853 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by MooreTrucker
dc509
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kendall set that up. That's not how Logan operates. He would setup her up to fail in some other way.
Anagrammatic Nudist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This show isn't about sneaky red herrings and other nonsense mysteries. Why are folks trying to turn it into this?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's a show that's literally about lying and deceit. That's all these characters do. Also, Logan could have very easily just told someone to disrupt the town hall without being the one to choose the song/method. I'm not saying I believe it, I'm just saying that's how I read it in the moment.
Anagrammatic Nudist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

It's a show that's literally about lying and deceit. That's all these characters do. Also, Logan could have very easily just told someone to disrupt the town hall without being the one to choose the song/method. I'm not saying I believe it, I'm just saying that's how I read it in the moment.
Lying and deceit from the characters, yes, but not from the directors to the audience. This isn't some Mare of Eastwood-esque mystery show. The first two seasons of this show were nothing of the sort, so why would it start now? That's not the fabric of this show, and I pray it doesn't become that.
Four Seasons Landscaping
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can this thread please not go down a rabbit hole because tccts tried to get a little too clever?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

Last week everyone went down a far deeper rabbit hole as to who might have *actually* sent the doughnuts, and all kinds of discussion was had about Tom or whoever else could have sent them. That was just as ridiculous or conspiratorial or "too clever" as my half-assed theory, but now, suddenly we can't get derailed by this discussion? Seriously? Mine wasn't even the first theory posted as to the culprit behind the speakers.

You guys need to loosen up. It's a message board, and I was simply throwing out an idea, piggy-backing off of another idea. Same as what happened last week (a convo I didn't even participate in, for the record).
Four Seasons Landscaping
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty please?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I had no intention of discussion it further. Just calling out your hypocrisy, that's all.
Four Seasons Landscaping
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn you are thin skinned.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is your problem? All I did was post a quick, simple, throw-away theory late last night and now you can't help but play thread police and be a weirdo about it. It's a message board. We're going to talk about all aspects of a show. What we liked, disliked, and any theories we might have, just as we've done for three seasons now.
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
are any of you guys listening to the prestige tv podcast on the ringer? sean fennessey and joanna robinson do a pretty good recap of the latest episode on wednesdays and joanna interviews a cast member. so far, she's talked to brian cox, alan ruck and sarah snook.

pretty interesting listen.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I still need to listen to this week's episode, but the first two were great. They have the best analysis by far.
dc509
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jackie childs said:

are any of you guys listening to the prestige tv podcast on the ringer? sean fennessey and joanna robinson do a pretty good recap of the latest episode on wednesdays and joanna interviews a cast member. so far, she's talked to brian cox, alan ruck and sarah snook.

pretty interesting listen.
I like Joanna Robinson's takes, but Sean Fennessey doesn't do it for me on this one. I do like their recap though overall. Due to Andy Greenwald's continued presence I can't bring myself to listen to The Watch.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Question: How does Greg still work for Waystar? Isn't everyone aware that he provided Ken with the incriminating papers? Or does only Tom know? I know Greg told Tom he wasn't "necessarily" involved, as a means to try and remain neutral, but I'm still a bit confused on this plot point, because wouldn't Greg spending the entire day after the press conference with Ken be reason enough to raise suspicion or for Logan to fire him? And wasn't it Gerri/Tom who sent the lawyer to represent Greg, thus Waystar knows he's involved somehow?
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This makes no sense whatsoever to me.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anagrammatic Nudist said:

This show isn't about sneaky red herrings and other nonsense mysteries. Why are folks trying to turn it into this?


Bingo. However I do still stick to Tom having sent the donuts. (Though at this point I doubt it's ever mentioned again.)
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can't just fire someone on suspicions alone. They'd need a legal reason to do so.
BowSowy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Question: How does Greg still work for Waystar? Isn't everyone aware that he provided Ken with the incriminating papers? Or does only Tom know? I know Greg told Tom he wasn't "necessarily" involved, as a means to try and remain neutral, but I'm still a bit confused on this plot point, because wouldn't Greg spending the entire day after the press conference with Ken be reason enough to raise suspicion or for Logan to fire him? And wasn't it Gerri/Tom who sent the lawyer to represent Greg, thus Waystar knows he's involved somehow?
I'll chalk that up to the same reason they can't fire Ken. Firing a whistleblower in the midst of an investigation really doesn't look good.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Question: How does Greg still work for Waystar? Isn't everyone aware that he provided Ken with the incriminating papers? Or does only Tom know? I know Greg told Tom he wasn't "necessarily" involved, as a means to try and remain neutral, but I'm still a bit confused on this plot point, because wouldn't Greg spending the entire day after the press conference with Ken be reason enough to raise suspicion or for Logan to fire him? And wasn't it Gerri/Tom who sent the lawyer to represent Greg, thus Waystar knows he's involved somehow?
I really have no ****ing clue what is going on in this show.

Other than a ****ton of F bombs.

But I like it.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BowSowy said:

TCTTS said:

Question: How does Greg still work for Waystar? Isn't everyone aware that he provided Ken with the incriminating papers? Or does only Tom know? I know Greg told Tom he wasn't "necessarily" involved, as a means to try and remain neutral, but I'm still a bit confused on this plot point, because wouldn't Greg spending the entire day after the press conference with Ken be reason enough to raise suspicion or for Logan to fire him? And wasn't it Gerri/Tom who sent the lawyer to represent Greg, thus Waystar knows he's involved somehow?
I'll chalk that up to the same reason they can't fire Ken. Firing a whistleblower in the midst of an investigation really doesn't look good.

I never really thought of Greg as a whistleblower, but yeah, he is, and this makes total sense. I guess I just figured Logan would have found a way to freeze his credentials/access or whatever, seeing as Greg is basically Team Kendall, and that's what he did to Ken. After so many scenes of him being with Ken, I was just surprised to see Greg still working at Waystar. It caught me off guard. It makes sense from a corporate standpoint, it's just not what I was expecting.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

This makes no sense whatsoever to me.

My post makes no sense to you, or you share my confusion?
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The theory itself.

Logan would be cutting off his nose to spite his face. Not to mention the choice of song, seeing the stuff in Ken's office, and him actually saying he needs them to go buy stuff.

I think you're getting way too clever and it's just not that kind of show.

The donuts thing is actually pretty reasonable if you see that original post I made. And the show never really showed us what happened there.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sorry, I assumed you were responding to my post directly above, not the one from earlier.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That said, I read what you posted and have watched that final sequence twice since then, and don't at all think it implicates Tom in any way. The way they describe that sequence, and the way it's actually cut, don't really match up.
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

BowSowy said:

TCTTS said:

Question: How does Greg still work for Waystar? Isn't everyone aware that he provided Ken with the incriminating papers? Or does only Tom know? I know Greg told Tom he wasn't "necessarily" involved, as a means to try and remain neutral, but I'm still a bit confused on this plot point, because wouldn't Greg spending the entire day after the press conference with Ken be reason enough to raise suspicion or for Logan to fire him? And wasn't it Gerri/Tom who sent the lawyer to represent Greg, thus Waystar knows he's involved somehow?
I'll chalk that up to the same reason they can't fire Ken. Firing a whistleblower in the midst of an investigation really doesn't look good.

I never really thought of Greg as a whistleblower, but yeah, he is, and this makes total sense. I guess I just figured Logan would have found a way to freeze his credentials/access or whatever, seeing as Greg is basically Team Kendall, and that's what he did to Ken. After so many scenes of him being with Ken, I was just surprised to see Greg still working at Waystar. It caught me off guard. It makes sense from a corporate standpoint, it's just not what I was expecting.
This is a good question.

Not firing a whistleblower (or potential whistleblower) makes sense in the real world. but we've seen Logan do whatever he wants with little regard for the law or corporate governance before, so I think if Logan truly believed Greg was working to bring him down, he'd fire him, cut off access, etc.

Plus we don't know what (if anything) Tom is telling Logan. If you're Tom and you directed an employee under your supervision to shred a bunch of incriminating files, it would make sense to try and keep him close and not just can him. not to mention even though Greg appears to be Team Kendall, he is still calling Tom with information too (like Ken's coming to the office).

i guess the bottom line is that I think both sides think Greg is "in play", so neither would do anything to jeopardize that...although kendall not buying him the watch was an odd/bad decision.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Logan suspects Greg, strategically he absolutely wouldn't cut him off. Keep your enemies close. At this point Greg doesn't have additional access to anything the FBI doesn't, so may as well keep him in the fold and try to manipulate him as needed. All firing him would do is cement him going to Team Kendall.
dc509
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jackie childs said:

TCTTS said:

BowSowy said:

TCTTS said:

Question: How does Greg still work for Waystar? Isn't everyone aware that he provided Ken with the incriminating papers? Or does only Tom know? I know Greg told Tom he wasn't "necessarily" involved, as a means to try and remain neutral, but I'm still a bit confused on this plot point, because wouldn't Greg spending the entire day after the press conference with Ken be reason enough to raise suspicion or for Logan to fire him? And wasn't it Gerri/Tom who sent the lawyer to represent Greg, thus Waystar knows he's involved somehow?
I'll chalk that up to the same reason they can't fire Ken. Firing a whistleblower in the midst of an investigation really doesn't look good.

I never really thought of Greg as a whistleblower, but yeah, he is, and this makes total sense. I guess I just figured Logan would have found a way to freeze his credentials/access or whatever, seeing as Greg is basically Team Kendall, and that's what he did to Ken. After so many scenes of him being with Ken, I was just surprised to see Greg still working at Waystar. It caught me off guard. It makes sense from a corporate standpoint, it's just not what I was expecting.
This is a good question.

Not firing a whistleblower (or potential whistleblower) makes sense in the real world. but we've seen Logan do whatever he wants with little regard for the law or corporate governance before, so I think if Logan truly believed Greg was working to bring him down, he'd fire him, cut off access, etc.

Plus we don't know what (if anything) Tom is telling Logan. If you're Tom and you directed an employee under your supervision to shred a bunch of incriminating files, it would make sense to try and keep him close and not just can him. not to mention even though Greg appears to be Team Kendall, he is still calling Tom with information too (like Ken's coming to the office).

i guess the bottom line is that I think both sides think Greg is "in play", so neither would do anything to jeopardize that...although kendall not buying him the watch was an odd/bad decision.
I think part of the reason is that no one takes Greg seriously. They don't realize they should care what he is doing. Which is going to make whatever his eventual (completely accidental) play so devastating.
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
so i waited until season 3 started to do my re-watch of the first two seasons. some interesting things thus far...

1. i forgot what a raging a-hole Connor is during the Roy gala event. it was weird compared to how we see him now and, honestly, even a couple of episodes later in season 1.

2. right after the vote of no-confidence fails, Logan leaks stories about Kendall relapsing and it causes issues with Rava. that's not surprising, but what was is that at Connor's ranch, Shiv talks about her dad leaking stories about Kendall as thought it's the worst thing ever. funny to see her just two seasons later doing the same thing her daddy did.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good catch.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So they've gone and made Shiv completely unlikable and unredeemable huh? She has been for a while but it's next level now. She might be my least favorite person on the show.
BowSowy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

So they've gone and made Shiv completely unlikable and unredeemable huh? She has been for a while but it's next level now. She might be my least favorite person on the show.
I was so happy to see everyone ice her out. I genuinely don't know how this plays out. I thought it was interesting to see Connor use leverage for the first time, and I'm curious if that was coincidental with Greg going over to the Waystar side.
dc509
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I bet "Nero and Sporus" has been googled a few times this morning.
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:

So they've gone and made Shiv completely unlikable and unredeemable huh? She has been for a while but it's next level now. She might be my least favorite person on the show.
mine too.

i mean, they're all terrible in their own way. but shiv has done some absolutely terrible stuff and still thinks she's God's gift to Waystar. it is somewhat rewarding to see her getting so little respect, Connor calling her out for "playing post office" and then Logan telling her to stand down.

i guess we'll see how she reacts to that over the coming weeks.
dc509
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jackie childs said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

So they've gone and made Shiv completely unlikable and unredeemable huh? She has been for a while but it's next level now. She might be my least favorite person on the show.
mine too.

i mean, they're all terrible in their own way. but shiv has done some absolutely terrible stuff and still thinks she's God's gift to Waystar. it is somewhat rewarding to see her getting so little respect, Connor calling her out for "playing post office" and then Logan telling her to stand down.

i guess we'll see how she reacts to that over the coming weeks.
She has certainly put herself into an unenviable position. I don't think she's anymore unlikable or unredeemable as anyone else on the show, but for the first couple of seasons her attempt to hold herself above the bull**** has made her break bad seem especially rough. Whatever happens a complete piece of **** is going to "win."
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IMO she's the most unrealistic character arc on the show. I get that much of the show involves the kids making the same mistakes time and time again, but Shiv was supposedly too smart to fall for all her Dad's bull**** and instead decided to carve her own path... Then she jumps at the chance the first time Logan dangles the CEO title.

Then she finds out it was bull***** OK. Lesson learned (even though she claimed she had already learned it).

Nope. Here we are again with her thinking her father is being upfront with her.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.