***Official Early Vote Tracking***

220,415 Views | 1659 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by RED AG 98
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NoVa votes more in the last week because they put out quadruple the polling stations, fyi.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

NoVa votes more in the last week because they put out quadruple the polling stations, fyi.
I didn't know that but makes sense. Thanks for the information.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MN Thread. A lot of assumptions, but this guy is pretty good in MN.


SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are you sure he's a lefty? He signs off with Let's flip MN Red for the first time since 1972!!.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SwigAg11 said:

Are you sure he's a lefty? He signs off with Let's flip MN Red for the first time since 1972!!.
Hmm... For some reason I remembered him being a lefty. Guess I can't keep my people on X straight. Old age maybe.
ord89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I work in defense and we just completed our weekly staff meeting, which includes our Washington Ops team leader. His prediction was Trump and republicans take Senate BUT lose the House.

A guy that has the pulse of things in DC. Probably not worth anything, but thought I would share his prediction.
gigemJTH12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What did he say about President?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Megyn is on the team now.
ord89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't get it to work at work... so... Anyone?

ETA: Prediction: Harris, 48.5 percent; Trump 48.2 percent; others and None of These Candidates, 3.3 percent.
Senate: Rosen, 50 percent; Brown, 45 percent; others and none of the above, 5 percent.



TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

LMCane said:

some more good news


And he lost to Youngkin in 2021. If that is the election they are referring to.
Would be biggest upset of the night.

Praying.

I feel bad for most Virginians. They are having their state infested with overpaid government bureaucrats and lobbyists in NoVa.
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

I can't get it to work at work... so... Anyone?




Seems like he knows.
Mostly Foggy Recollection
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He knows Harry Reid's machine will brow beat anyone who hasn't turned in a ballot. It's what they do, or they fire them.

He also says neither side can figure out who will win, and he's just going with a gut feeling the Reid Machine will find just enough.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I still don't understand why states take mail ballots after election day. If your ballot is not in by election day, sorry charlie. You've had probably close to a month to mail it in.
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

MN Thread. A lot of assumptions, but this guy is pretty good in MN.



I lived in MN-03 from 2017 to 2022.

When I got there, squishy RINO Eric Paulsen was the Congressman. He was defeated by Dean Phillips in 2018. Now, one of the few leftist friends I had there (Kelly Morrison) is seemingly a shoe in to win Phillips vacated seat.

I know this district well. I want MN to flip red, but the CD-3 district is like a plus 7 Dem district and they have early voted in excess of 60%. Mngander should factor that district as well into his turnout math, as that changes the script in favor of the DFL (MN Dems) significantly.

I hope I am wrong about this, but I see MN being a Harris +2 to +5 hold.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

I still don't understand why states take mail ballots after election day. If your ballot is not in by election day, sorry charlie. You've had probably close to a month to mail it in.
Yeah, that NV Supreme Court decision to allow ballots WITHOUT A POSTMARK up to 3 days AFTER election day to be counted is pretty inexplicable to me. Not sure what the rationale is for thinking those ballots would be legit.
TXAGGIES
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

will25u said:

I still don't understand why states take mail ballots after election day. If your ballot is not in by election day, sorry charlie. You've had probably close to a month to mail it in.
Yeah, that NV Supreme Court decision to allow ballots WITHOUT A POSTMARK up to 3 days AFTER election day to be counted is pretty inexplicable to me. Not sure what the rationale is for thinking those ballots would be legit.
Because the US Post Office is the least efficient "company" in the US.
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGGIES said:

txags92 said:

will25u said:

I still don't understand why states take mail ballots after election day. If your ballot is not in by election day, sorry charlie. You've had probably close to a month to mail it in.
Yeah, that NV Supreme Court decision to allow ballots WITHOUT A POSTMARK up to 3 days AFTER election day to be counted is pretty inexplicable to me. Not sure what the rationale is for thinking those ballots would be legit.
Because the US Post Office is the least efficient "company" in the US.


They don't even have to be postmarked. So it's not the usps. It's a bs allowance to cheat. Plain and simple.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGGIES said:

txags92 said:

will25u said:

I still don't understand why states take mail ballots after election day. If your ballot is not in by election day, sorry charlie. You've had probably close to a month to mail it in.
Yeah, that NV Supreme Court decision to allow ballots WITHOUT A POSTMARK up to 3 days AFTER election day to be counted is pretty inexplicable to me. Not sure what the rationale is for thinking those ballots would be legit.
Because the US Post Office is the least efficient "company" in the US.
If the USPS is handling them, they should have a postmark. How does a ballot without a postmark get there 3 days after election day?
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

I can't get it to work at work... so... Anyone?

ETA: Prediction: Harris, 48.5 percent; Trump 48.2 percent; others and None of These Candidates, 3.3 percent.
Senate: Rosen, 50 percent; Brown, 45 percent; others and none of the above, 5 percent.






Pure BS, it's obvious he's trying to GOT on Election Day for Dems.
Apertude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is right about AZ there are 218,000 non citizens on the rolls out there and they don't know if they can purge them in time.

Think about that AZ allowed non citizens to vote that is cheating I don't AZ goes red.

And Nevada is the story every Pres election really close than Las Vegas tips the scale blue.
1836er
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He just spent two weeks saying if the Democrats don't get the Republican lead down to 20,000 (before that he said even more) by election day Trump will win NV.

Now, with the Republican lead more than twice that just hours before the election he is saying the opposite. He is full of *****

He is gambling his reputation on hoping that his prediction will gin up enough last minute Democrat enthusiasm and create enough last minute Republican demoralization to speak his prediction into existence.

And even so, he's admitting that the independent vote in NV will still have to break heavily (double digits) toward Harris for his "prediction" to come true, which neither the current polling nor recent elections suggests. In fact the polling suggests the opposite; Trump is polling better with independents in NV and in a state where the independents tend to lean Republican.
Vance in '28
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1836er said:

He just spent two weeks saying if the Democrats don't get the Republican lead down to 20,000 (before that he said even more) by election day Trump will win NV.

Now, with the Republican lead more than twice that just hours before the election he is saying the opposite. He is full of *****

He is gambling his reputation on hoping that his prediction will gin up enough last minute Democrat enthusiasm and create enough last minute Republican demoralization to speak his prediction into existence.

And even so, he's admitting that the independent vote in NV will still have to break heavily (double digits) toward Harris for his "prediction" to come true, which neither the current polling nor recent elections suggests. In fact the polling suggests the opposite; Trump is polling better with independents in NV and in a state where the independents tend to lean Republican.

Great recap!
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

will25u said:

I still don't understand why states take mail ballots after election day. If your ballot is not in by election day, sorry charlie. You've had probably close to a month to mail it in.
Yeah, that NV Supreme Court decision to allow ballots WITHOUT A POSTMARK up to 3 days AFTER election day to be counted is pretty inexplicable to me. Not sure what the rationale is for thinking those ballots would be legit.
I don't think they care.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TheEternalOptimist said:

will25u said:

MN Thread. A lot of assumptions, but this guy is pretty good in MN.



I lived in MN-03 from 2017 to 2022.

When I got there, squishy RINO Eric Paulsen was the Congressman. He was defeated by Dean Phillips in 2018. Now, one of the few leftist friends I had there (Kelly Morrison) is seemingly a shoe in to win Phillips vacated seat.

I know this district well. I want MN to flip red, but the CD-3 district is like a plus 7 Dem district and they have early voted in excess of 60%. Mngander should factor that district as well into his turnout math, as that changes the script in favor of the DFL (MN Dems) significantly.

I hope I am wrong about this, but I see MN being a Harris +2 to +5 hold.

I spoke to a good friend who lives in a Minneapolis suburb a few days ago and has lived there his whole life. He said one of the reasons Minnesota has a chance to go Red is because of Walz.

He says nobody up there can stand him and that he's widely regardless as a complete idiot.

He says the key for Democrats there is turning out the inner city vote, which they are pretty good at.

Minneapolis-Saint Paul will decide the vote for Minnesotans as it always does because the rest of the state is red but very sparsely populated.
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They did elect him.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
more good news Georgia voting

AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apertude said:

He is right about AZ there are 218,000 non citizens on the rolls out there and they don't know if they can purge them in time.

Think about that AZ allowed non citizens to vote that is cheating I don't AZ goes red.

And Nevada is the story every Pres election really close than Las Vegas tips the scale blue.
Well, if a significant number of those 218,000 non-citizens actually vote, then Trump will have legitimate grounds to challenge. And those voters can go to jail.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

He says the key for Democrats there is turning out the inner city vote, which they are pretty good at.

Minneapolis-Saint Paul will decide the vote for Minnesotans as it always does because the rest of the state is red but very sparsely populated.
What about the Iron Range? Isn't that section of MN trending more red?
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

LMCane said:

some more good news


And he lost to Youngkin in 2021. If that is the election they are referring to.
correct that is the implicit point

that in the last statewide election in VA they had fewer banked democrat votes than they do today

and that was Youngkin and not Trump running.

the closer the race is in VA - means the better odds we have of winning North Carolina.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The dude has a trans kid. Picking Trump would have been like poison. I'm pretty sure he just couldn't make himself believe it will happen. I think it will be close unless indy's are split or break GOP. If they do... Katie bar the door.
IDaggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgag12 said:

will25u said:

I can't get it to work at work... so... Anyone?

ETA: Prediction: Harris, 48.5 percent; Trump 48.2 percent; others and None of These Candidates, 3.3 percent.
Senate: Rosen, 50 percent; Brown, 45 percent; others and none of the above, 5 percent.






Pure BS, it's obvious he's trying to GOT on Election Day for Dems.
To put his pecentages in perspective, if the total Nevada turnout is equal to 2020 then he is saying Harris would win by 4,120 votes. If it is 90% total turnout then he is saying she will win by 3,708 votes. If it is 80% turnout of 2020, then Harris wins by 3,296 votes.. He is anti Trump so I'd say this is as close to a Trump win from Ralson you can get.
rathAG05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not really digging into number here, but does that math make sense at all?
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

TheEternalOptimist said:

will25u said:

MN Thread. A lot of assumptions, but this guy is pretty good in MN.



I lived in MN-03 from 2017 to 2022.

When I got there, squishy RINO Eric Paulsen was the Congressman. He was defeated by Dean Phillips in 2018. Now, one of the few leftist friends I had there (Kelly Morrison) is seemingly a shoe in to win Phillips vacated seat.

I know this district well. I want MN to flip red, but the CD-3 district is like a plus 7 Dem district and they have early voted in excess of 60%. Mngander should factor that district as well into his turnout math, as that changes the script in favor of the DFL (MN Dems) significantly.

I hope I am wrong about this, but I see MN being a Harris +2 to +5 hold.

I spoke to a good friend who lives in a Minneapolis suburb a few days ago and has lived there his whole life. He said one of the reasons Minnesota has a chance to go Red is because of Walz.

He says nobody up there can stand him and that he's widely regardless as a complete idiot.

He says the key for Democrats there is turning out the inner city vote, which they are pretty good at.

Minneapolis-Saint Paul will decide the vote for Minnesotans as it always does because the rest of the state is red but very sparsely populated.
My liberal neighbors in Chanhassen/Minnetonka loved Walz. He overwhelmingly hated outside the metro though. Billboards and signs on I-94 going towards Fargo show the hatred for him.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.