Or building 7 was set to be knocked down by the owners in an insurance scam and.........., u know the rest of the story.
The unchecked fires ties to the lack of loss of life. No one cared to try to save it; attention was devoted to rescue efforts --the fires were just left to rage. That leaves your "weird" construction point to explain the manner of its collapse. But does it. A fraud related to write-off like Ubitag quipped about seems possible too.CanyonAg77 said:
You point is good, however Building 7 collapsed because of weird construction and unchecked fires.
That all sounds plausible to me.titan said:The unchecked fires ties to the lack of loss of life. No one cared to try to save it; attention was devoted to rescue efforts --the fires were just left to rage. That leaves your "weird" construction point to explain the manner of its collapse. But does it. A fraud related to write-off like Ubitag quipped about seems possible too.CanyonAg77 said:
You point is good, however Building 7 collapsed because of weird construction and unchecked fires.
Well, Alex Jones has a lot of stuff on YouTube.snowdog90 said:CanyonAg77 said:Quote:
Then someone like Cody Snodgres miraculously survives several attempts on his life
According to who, Cody Snodgres?
I was a Navy Seal Green Beret USAF Parajumper Marine Recon, and I've survived 300 different attempts on my life by people who claim that my Pooka, Harvey*, is not real.
Prove me wrong.
* Harvey
There are hundreds of hours of him on YouTube. Listen to him. He's also written a 700+ page book about his time in black ops. See what you think. Here's a YouTube video that's almost 2 hours long. I haven't listened to all of this one but I will now. I'm sure you will ignore it.
I don't know if he's lying or not. If so, he's a much better liar than the Clintons, but I guess you disagree with that since I guess you believe the Clintons are innocent of all the conspiracy theories they're named in.
So listen to it if you like. OR just call him a liar based simply on the fact that you don't like what he's saying. Whatever.
In the 50s and 60s, there is a story that one of the Border Blaster radio preachers was offering signed photos of Jesus Christ.Quote:
And remember as you study the channel below, the Miracle Water is FREE! I, mean the guy has stuff on YouTube, so I am sure he is telling the truth.
Might have been legit...as in (pronounced) "Haysuus" Christ, the guys radio station producer or something.CanyonAg77 said:In the 50s and 60s, there is a story that one of the Border Blaster radio preachers was offering signed photos of Jesus Christ.Quote:
And remember as you study the channel below, the Miracle Water is FREE! I, mean the guy has stuff on YouTube, so I am sure he is telling the truth.
Oh I have no doubt Epstein was a pedo. And I have no doubt that some of his wealthy friends also partook of underage girls.hbtheduce said:
The Jeffrey Epstein stuff is pretty rock solid. It also appears Prince Andrew has some exposure from the revived focused on that sick piece of *****
Or is it your assessment he wasn't a massive pedophile? He didn't have private island where he took wealthy clients to have sex with underage victims? He had billions of dollars without any public business activity (suggesting a high number of wealthy clients)?
Epstein was given a slap on the wrist until cernovich got his case unsealed. A cabinet member (who was the prosecutor in florida) had to step down because of his corrupt handling of the case.
Add in other rings that have been discovered and shut down over the years. Catholic Church scandals, Penn State scandal. Pedophile rings exist, some of them are creepy poor people, others are creepy wealthy people in positions of power.
Quote:
The same government that let Epstein operate for years with free reign. Bush was President when Epstein was first "caught" pre-2008. He didn't seem to give a **** about a massive pedophile ring torturing, raping and murdering hundreds, thousands of kids,
IDAGG said:Oh I have no doubt Epstein was a pedo. And I have no doubt that some of his wealthy friends also partook of underage girls.hbtheduce said:
The Jeffrey Epstein stuff is pretty rock solid. It also appears Prince Andrew has some exposure from the revived focused on that sick piece of *****
Or is it your assessment he wasn't a massive pedophile? He didn't have private island where he took wealthy clients to have sex with underage victims? He had billions of dollars without any public business activity (suggesting a high number of wealthy clients)?
Epstein was given a slap on the wrist until cernovich got his case unsealed. A cabinet member (who was the prosecutor in florida) had to step down because of his corrupt handling of the case.
Add in other rings that have been discovered and shut down over the years. Catholic Church scandals, Penn State scandal. Pedophile rings exist, some of them are creepy poor people, others are creepy wealthy people in positions of power.
What I object to is the insane exaggeration of this to fit a predetermined conspiracy theory. One of our favorite Q Anon posters on this thread stated it as a fact that Epstein and his ring had tortured and killed thousands of children. Let me repeat that. Thousands of children.
Do you believe that Epstein and his buddies tortured and killed thousands of children?
Edit to add: Here is the quote from him to save you the trouble of finding it. Bonus points to him for slandering George W. Bush as not caring about thousands of kids getting tortured and killed by Epstein.Quote:
The same government that let Epstein operate for years with free reign. Bush was President when Epstein was first "caught" pre-2008. He didn't seem to give a **** about a massive pedophile ring torturing, raping and murdering hundreds, thousands of kids,
I am not defending the federal prosecutors and their handling (mishandling) of Epstein's case. And while the buck stops at the top, I doubt George W had any idea what some federal prosecutor was doing or not doing in Florida.hbtheduce said:
As far as defending Bush, I think that falls to you to prove there wasn't massive malfeasance in the original handling of the case. It's not a good look for bush that such a prosecutor basically let this guy walk.
Right. And I would like to believe that if he really had been killing thousands of girls, W would have arranged for him to become an "unfortunate statistic" of some kind. It was more likely either prosecutorial bungling (which seems an epidemic at times) or corruption. But that it went up to Bush's WH sounds crazy. Because of the character of the man even if you don't trust the office any more.IDAGG said:I am not defending the federal prosecutors and their handling (mishandling) of Epstein's case. And while the buck stops at the top, I doubt George W had any idea what some federal prosecutor was doing or not doing in Florida.hbtheduce said:
As far as defending Bush, I think that falls to you to prove there wasn't massive malfeasance in the original handling of the case. It's not a good look for bush that such a prosecutor basically let this guy walk.
IDAGG said:I am not defending the federal prosecutors and their handling (mishandling) of Epstein's case. And while the buck stops at the top, I doubt George W had any idea what some federal prosecutor was doing or not doing in Florida.hbtheduce said:
As far as defending Bush, I think that falls to you to prove there wasn't massive malfeasance in the original handling of the case. It's not a good look for bush that such a prosecutor basically let this guy walk.
Here is a link to the Miami Herald article that blew this thing wide open. The timeline has Prince Andrew's name coming out in a lawsuit filed in early 2015. Bush left office in January 2009.hbtheduce said:IDAGG said:I am not defending the federal prosecutors and their handling (mishandling) of Epstein's case. And while the buck stops at the top, I doubt George W had any idea what some federal prosecutor was doing or not doing in Florida.hbtheduce said:
As far as defending Bush, I think that falls to you to prove there wasn't massive malfeasance in the original handling of the case. It's not a good look for bush that such a prosecutor basically let this guy walk.
It is a case that implicated the previous president and British royalty. I find it highly unlikely he didn't hear about it. Now I think we need more evidence of that before we freak out on W and suggest he was complicit. But I do think it deserves criticism and more investigation to see if Bush did have knowledge.
IDAGG said:Here is a link to the Miami Herald article that blew this thing wide open. The timeline has Prince Andrew's name coming out in a lawsuit filed in early 2015. Bush left office in January 2009.hbtheduce said:IDAGG said:I am not defending the federal prosecutors and their handling (mishandling) of Epstein's case. And while the buck stops at the top, I doubt George W had any idea what some federal prosecutor was doing or not doing in Florida.hbtheduce said:
As far as defending Bush, I think that falls to you to prove there wasn't massive malfeasance in the original handling of the case. It's not a good look for bush that such a prosecutor basically let this guy walk.
It is a case that implicated the previous president and British royalty. I find it highly unlikely he didn't hear about it. Now I think we need more evidence of that before we freak out on W and suggest he was complicit. But I do think it deserves criticism and more investigation to see if Bush did have knowledge.
The flight logs that showed Clinton and Dershowitz flew on Epstein's plane came out in 2010. Does this prove that it was not known in 2008 that Clinton and Prince Andrew were involved in his debauchery? No, not conclusively, but it points in that direction certainly.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article221404845.html
Spyderman said:
One theory that might have some validity is the socialist input on climate change.
TAMUallen said:Spyderman said:
One theory that might have some validity is the socialist input on climate change.
Go on... you mean that socialists are proponents of the man made cataclysmic climate change in an attempt to essentially be paid? Read Michael Crichton's "State of Fear" for an interesting 2004 view on the climate change crazies
FIFY. So I think this must be Q code that means the pee tape is being released!!Redstone said:
Friends, I hope everyone enjoyed a restful Kwanzaa.
We are back with moreacid rainGolden showers of truth.
As there are many Astros fans on TexAgs, let's begin with MLB.
Scott Brosius' son claims that Mike Trout is on HGH for a thyroid condition, has been for years, that the league knows and approves, and that this is a secret "loophole" to get around the rules - one not available to non-stars.
Redstone said:
Was there an Alzheimer's 'cabal' that thwarted progress toward a cure for decades?
I believe so.
Look it up!
Neurobiologist Rachael Neve of Massachusetts General Hospital believes so.
I do too.