Yeah, I think "timeline" and "universe" are not the same thing. One timeline can have multiple universes.
I think.
I think.
So, at the end of Deadpool 2, WW goes back and kills two versions of himself, he is pruning . . . WW variants?Mayor West said:jeffk said:
When will we see a Deadpool Loki variant?
What if we did, but he was pruned?!
Eventually this gets too complicated and I start losing interest.JJxvi said:
I think the way "timeline" is used in "sacred timeline" is just different than the way a sci fi/time travel fan thinks of a "timeline"
one MEEN Ag said:
The big question I have is, after this next story arc what's left?
Multiverse level story arc would be done. Already doing time travel. So is there just a reboot?
one MEEN Ag said:
The big question I have is, after this next story arc what's left?
Multiverse level story arc would be done. Already doing time travel. So is there just a reboot?
one MEEN Ag said:
The big question I have is, after this next story arc what's left?
Multiverse level story arc would be done. Already doing time travel. So is there just a reboot?
YouBet said:one MEEN Ag said:
The big question I have is, after this next story arc what's left?
Multiverse level story arc would be done. Already doing time travel. So is there just a reboot?
DC / Marvel crossover movies.
mazag08 said:
So maybe I missed it..
But at the end of episode 2 when Sylvie bombs the timeline, we see Ravonna grab a weapon from her collection of "trophies".
In episode 4 when Ravonna and Mobius are in her office, we see her put it back and he mentions something along the lines of "this might my favorite trophy of yours". Something like that..
Seemed odd to me.
AliasMan02 said:
Sorry, just getting caught up, but the dramatic timeline branch wasn't caused by two Lokis potentially being in love (or whatever), but by the impending death of a Loki. Right?
Lokis must always survive.
Edit: Except we've seen one die for real. Maybe that's acceptable because an exact copy survives.
I was thinking about this and I don't think so, but this kind of starts to hurt your head to think about.AgStuckinLBK said:AliasMan02 said:
Sorry, just getting caught up, but the dramatic timeline branch wasn't caused by two Lokis potentially being in love (or whatever), but by the impending death of a Loki. Right?
Lokis must always survive.
Edit: Except we've seen one die for real. Maybe that's acceptable because an exact copy survives.
One or both of them dying seems to be a really good answer to this and why the line was so steep and climbing as the planet was about to be destroyed.
bobinator said:
She stabs him and as each Loki dies, the remaining Lokis become more powerful. Wasn't that the plot of a Jet Li movie?
In the opening sequence of today's ep, the name on this tower reads "QENG" which is Qeng Enterprises from the comics owned by a "Mr. Gryphon" aka Nathaniel Richards aka.... KANG THE CONQUEROR!! 👀👀
— Shruti Rao (@shrutiraoart) July 7, 2021
Hmmm.... INTERESTING!#LokiWednesdays #Loki pic.twitter.com/P6jlBythVh
This.YNWA_AG said:
I mean the alioth is super connected to Kang as well. Can't see how he isn't at least revealed like thanos in avengers in this show with all the Kang Easter eggs