quote:
That can't be real.
quote:
quote:quote:
That can't be real.
kangsta said:
not proud at all. i was in school when that happened.
how proud are you of the glory holes on the atm campus?
Quote:
During the heyday of the ku klux klan in the 1920's, I am certain there was as large a percentage of Klaggies as Klanhorns. The centers for klan power and activity were in the smaller towns and rural areas, bastions of Aggiedom.
I embrace this topic. History shows that we were always ahead of y'all concerning this topic. Kind of like the recent tuition program for economically needy students.LonghornDub said:
During the heyday of the ku klux klan in the 1920's, I am certain there was as large a percentage of Klaggies as Klanhorns. The centers for klan power and activity were in the smaller towns and rural areas, bastions of Aggiedom. Not much has changed except UT and Austin have gotten super liberal since 1968 which has been bad in many ways but increased inclusiveness while the rest of the state has not followed suit. Aggies should really stay away from this topic.
Go F yourself for this. To insinuate that citizens of small towns have not embraced inclusiveness like "UT and Austin" is absolute trash. This poster should be banned. Very offensive to belittle with such a blanket statement on this topic.LonghornDub said:
During the heyday of the ku klux klan in the 1920's, I am certain there was as large a percentage of Klaggies as Klanhorns. The centers for klan power and activity were in the smaller towns and rural areas, bastions of Aggiedom. Not much has changed except UT and Austin have gotten super liberal since 1968 which has been bad in many ways but increased inclusiveness while the rest of the state has not followed suit. Aggies should really stay away from this topic.
Dude, this is rivalries.Roadhouse said:Go F yourself for this. To insinuate that citizens of small towns have not embraced inclusiveness like "UT and Austin" is absolute trash. This poster should be banned. Very offensive to belittle with such a blanket statement on this topic.LonghornDub said:
During the heyday of the ku klux klan in the 1920's, I am certain there was as large a percentage of Klaggies as Klanhorns. The centers for klan power and activity were in the smaller towns and rural areas, bastions of Aggiedom. Not much has changed except UT and Austin have gotten super liberal since 1968 which has been bad in many ways but increased inclusiveness while the rest of the state has not followed suit. Aggies should really stay away from this topic.
A great song by Adrian BelewGreat Beard of Zeus said:
Bumpity bump
huisachel said:
And UT admitted its first black student half a dozen years before A&M did
And let women in 80 years before Aggies did.
I guess the men just didn't like to have women around
I am not trying to claim any kind of victory, just pointing out that blacks don't seem too intimidated by our klannish behavior compared to whatever goes on in Aggieland now that you admit them and women. And they are an ethnicity, not a denominationtechnoviking said:huisachel said:
And UT admitted its first black student half a dozen years before A&M did
And let women in 80 years before Aggies did.
I guess the men just didn't like to have women around
You're intellectually bankrupt.
And you're an idiot if you're trying to "claim victory" for having 1% more of a denomination on campus.
I'm from outside of one of the wrong sides of Waco.AgOutsideAustin said:
Are you a member of The Squad? Preaching mighty UT from the big city as inclusive while us country bumpkins ain't.
Thank you for the history lesson and letting us know what you think our place is and what we shouldn't bring up.
GTFO
What's wrong with the 50s ?dixichkn said:
Yeah boah, yew ain't got no bizness edumacatin' us good ol boys about no damn racism
(Scuse me fer a second whiles I spit this terbacky juice).......
Are you freakin kidding me? What century do you think this is? Still see all Aggies like this?
C'mon Dub. You're better than this. Get your head out of the 1950's
kangsta said:
not proud at all. i was in school when that happened.
how proud are you of the glory holes on the atm campus?
huisachel said:I am not trying to claim any kind of victory, just pointing out that blacks don't seem too intimidated by our klannish behavior compared to whatever goes on in Aggieland now that you admit them and women. And they are an ethnicity, not a denominationtechnoviking said:huisachel said:
And UT admitted its first black student half a dozen years before A&M did
And let women in 80 years before Aggies did.
I guess the men just didn't like to have women around
You're intellectually bankrupt.
And you're an idiot if you're trying to "claim victory" for having 1% more of a denomination on campus.