Cheryl's tattoos make me want to throw up.
******San Antonio Spurs 2011-2012******
61,273 Views |
3073 Replies |
Last: 13 yr ago by Enzo The Baker
quote:
Did anyone really expect the Lakers to go 2-0 against the Spurs with no Kobe?
Did anyone really expect the Lakers to keep it within 20 on their own ****ing court? I mean that's a big, nearly unattainable goal!
quote:
Cheryl's tattoos make me want to throw up.
This.
I'd hit it
With a crowbar
Duncan - DND - Old, for sure.
I think Diaw and Blair start tomorrow, and Manu gets 15-20 mins. Parker, could go either way.
I think Diaw and Blair start tomorrow, and Manu gets 15-20 mins. Parker, could go either way.
Id go ahead and sit Manu and Duncan. No need to push it right now. Tony can handle it and rest a game later. That way we have those 2 fresh again for LA on friday.
quote:
I don't understand how you think Bynum was shut down. He's 21, 7 shooting 50%. Not stellar, but even in a "shut down impolding game" he still was the second best player on the floor.
Duncan grabbed more rebounds, had a higher FG%, more assists, and less TOs. Bynum had 2 more points, though, so there is that.
EDIT: Oh Duncan was +26 and Bynum was -22 (for a net difference of 48). I know that's another stat you like to throw out there when it suits you.
[This message has been edited by atfarmer (edited 4/18/2012 12:18a).]
haha nice
[This message has been edited by Its A Sher Thing (edited 4/18/2012 12:24a).]
[This message has been edited by Its A Sher Thing (edited 4/18/2012 12:24a).]
Steve blake
Stomped mudhole in mf'ing lakers at Staples.
Very, very nice answer. A statement, in fact.
Very, very nice answer. A statement, in fact.
Get. In. My. POSTER!!!
San Antonio Superspurs
Statement, and message, sent by the Spurs of San Antonio last night. Lord have mercy what a beatdown.
nice win
I'll say it once more: I thought the story was how badly Parker abused Sessions. The Lakers are going to need to put Kobe on Tony if they play in the playoffs. Having to chase Tony around on the defensive end will affect Kobe's offense.
Enjoy the victory Spurs fans. See you in the playoffs.
http://deadspin.com/5903002/tony-parkers-crossover-of-ramon-sessions-is-so-good-sessionss-teammate-applauds
Jordan Hill applauds Tony Parker's moves.
Jordan Hill applauds Tony Parker's moves.
sharkenleo
Joined:
Nov 12, 2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great posts, guys!! Go Spurs Go!!
Lakers' worst loss of the season. Funny, I think the game last week was SA's worst loss of the season too.
I think I heard the commentators say it was the Laker's worst loss at Staples since '07.
Lakers lost by 19 at home to the spurs at the end of the '10 season. That ended up working out terribly for the Lakers.
How does the seeding work? Since the lakers are a match-up problem for SA, you'd think that SA would want them in the OKC side of the Western Conference bracket. That means they'd have to beat LAC, but the clippers are probably a better match up for the Spurs.
I am assuming that the Spurs need to hold onto the 1 seed for that to happen, assuming the Clippers can't catch the lakers.
I am assuming that the Spurs need to hold onto the 1 seed for that to happen, assuming the Clippers can't catch the lakers.
You said it. We want either Spurs at 1 and Lakers at 3 or Spurs at 2 and Lakers at 4.
The first is probably more likely, just gotta hope for some Clips losses.
The first is probably more likely, just gotta hope for some Clips losses.
Clippers Schedule
@Denver (L)
@Phoenix (L)
vs. Hornets (W)
@Atlanta (W)
@Knicks (L)
40-26
Lakers remaining
@Warriors (W)
@Spurs (L)
vs. Thunder (W)
@ Kings (W)
42-24
The Clippers schedule definitely suggests they will finish ahead of LA.
as of today the bracket is:
(1)Spurs
(8)Suns
vs.
(4)Clippers
(5)Grizzlies
-------------
(2)Thunder
(7)Mavs
vs.
(3)Lakers
(6)Nuggets
What the Spurs REALLY need is this:
1. Spurs
2. Thunder
3. Lakers
4. Clippers
5. Nuggets
6. Grizzlies
7. Mavs
8. Suns
That would mean the spurs get to the WCF by beating Suns and Clippers/Nuggets
@Denver (L)
@Phoenix (L)
vs. Hornets (W)
@Atlanta (W)
@Knicks (L)
40-26
Lakers remaining
@Warriors (W)
@Spurs (L)
vs. Thunder (W)
@ Kings (W)
42-24
The Clippers schedule definitely suggests they will finish ahead of LA.
as of today the bracket is:
(1)Spurs
(8)Suns
vs.
(4)Clippers
(5)Grizzlies
-------------
(2)Thunder
(7)Mavs
vs.
(3)Lakers
(6)Nuggets
What the Spurs REALLY need is this:
1. Spurs
2. Thunder
3. Lakers
4. Clippers
5. Nuggets
6. Grizzlies
7. Mavs
8. Suns
That would mean the spurs get to the WCF by beating Suns and Clippers/Nuggets
Not a chance in hell Memphis falls past 5. Take a a look at there sched. It's cake.
IMO. I can see the Lakers losing 2 games (SA, OKC) and as long as LAC doesn't go 4-1 than LAL should finish 3.
The Spurs still have to take care of business though, Pop will still rest his guys and expect the bench to win the games. He isn't going to push for the 1 seed. I'd be shocked to see Tim and Manu play tonight and SAC has had two days of rest. Spurs better come to play tonight.
IMO. I can see the Lakers losing 2 games (SA, OKC) and as long as LAC doesn't go 4-1 than LAL should finish 3.
The Spurs still have to take care of business though, Pop will still rest his guys and expect the bench to win the games. He isn't going to push for the 1 seed. I'd be shocked to see Tim and Manu play tonight and SAC has had two days of rest. Spurs better come to play tonight.
i agree, i've already mentioned before memphis has the easiest schedule in the league. but weirder things have happened.
Wait, I thought the Lakers were supposed to have past the Spurs in the standings like two or three weeks ago. What happened?
quote:
it probably wouldve helped to have Kobe.
For a guy who's quick to jump on "excuses", this sure smells like one.
quote:
The Spurs shot a season-high 63%+, and Parker was amazing on screen and rolls
a) the Spurs offense has been playing at an extremely high level all year,
b) Parker has been tearing it up all year, this wasn't just him "blowing up", and
c) you're not even going to own the fact that the laker "d" isn't what it used to be? There are TOO MANY HOLES in that defense now.
quote:
Did anyone really expect the Lakers to go 2-0 against the Spurs with no Kobe?
You say one thing, then you say another, then you say another. At some point, you've "predicted" any reasonable scenario just by waffling. You may have never said "LA will win this game", but you DID suggest that the Spurs would probably lose because it was the 2nd game in 2 nights.
You're like a politician. You weasel out of what you can, and then just lie about the rest.
yet another wednesday, and the lakers are still six games back from passing the spurs up.
sweet prediction, nutsack.
sweet prediction, nutsack.
Obi Wan seems like a really cool dude. Please continue with these incredibly hurtful insults. They are clever and reflect your supreme itelleeeegence.
you're on a spurs thread, pumping and hedging yourself in and out of predictions, talking on behalf of the fuggin lakers of all teams, and now you're cry/loling your way out of the fact that almost a month ago you said the lakers were on their way to passing the spurs in the standings.
the game is over. go back to your ****ty laker thread until the next SA/LA game. every time you come troll this thread, you look like that pimple faced twat in high school who tossed her snatch around to get some attention.
sweet ****ing life, bra
the game is over. go back to your ****ty laker thread until the next SA/LA game. every time you come troll this thread, you look like that pimple faced twat in high school who tossed her snatch around to get some attention.
sweet ****ing life, bra
Featured Stories
See All
Grahovac drives in seven as A&M completes sweep of Mizzou
by Richard Zane
5 Thoughts: First look at Jamie Morrison's 2026 Aggies
by Kay Naegeli
Spring Football Snippets: Practice No. 5
by Olin Buchanan
Texas A&M's Bucky McMillan set to receive raise, contract extension
by Luke Evangelist