Guys on Houston radio are idiots. Although it is on the NY/Jersey border.
J.D. c/o 05 said:
Guys on the radio say NJ?
Psych said:J.D. c/o 05 said:
Guys on the radio say NJ?
Same thing
Quote:
The Jets' offensive line (20th in pass-blocking, 28th in run-blocking) struggled immensely in 2015, especially on the outside. Their starting tackles, D'Brickashaw Ferguson (ranked 62nd of 76 OTs) and Breno Giacomini (ranked 69th), had replacement-level seasons. They were, arguably, the least effective duo of OTs in the NFL. In the passing game, Ferguson and Giacomini were dominated by edge rushers nearly every week (ranking 50th and 39th in pass-blocking efficiency among 59 OTs, respectively). Unfortunately, they weren't much better blocking the runrunning outside these tackles yielded only 2.8 yards per carry.
Quote:
Entering Monday, Pro Football Focus rated Giacomini 45th out of 79 offensive tackles in the league. He was 39th in pass blocking and 56th in run blocking. Last season, Giacomini finished 38th overall in PFF's offensive tackle ratings, including 39th in pass blocking and 41st in run blocking.
OPAG said:
I maybe in the minority here but I have little doubt that if Savage is healthy he will be the starter and he will stay the starter as long as the Texans are winning. There is NO WAY Watson starts from game one this year, barring injury and as mentioned that is the only reason Dak got a shot to play.
Why?
1. The Texan offensive system
The system is extremely demanding on QB's. In his last press conference for rookie camp BoB clearly stated that Watson is having to learn an entirely new language that is entirely different than what he did at Clemson. Even mentioning where you line up in the huddle.It was obvious to anyone with a brain that BoB was clearly trying to dampen any early expectations, or pressure, for Watson being anywhere near close to ready to be a starter.
2. Also the teams that start rookies early fit under a couple of categories.
A, They suck! They can afford to let the kid learn on the job as there are no great expectations. It also draws season tickets and keeps the fans engaged while they work through their suckage!
B. The QB is a top rated pick labled as a can't miss once every decade type of guy, like Manning or Luck. Oh and most the time teams that have that high a draft pick normally suck as well.
C. The team lost it's QB to injury and they are pressed into service.
This is the frigging NFL, and the number of rookie QB that come into this league and excel quickly is fairly low. As much as BoB puts on his QB to know, read and make decisions, he is not going to want Watson out their free lancing it. These are NFL defenses, very fast, complex, it would be unfair to expect Watson to come in form day one and grasp it, and I am sorry Bama would get trounced by any NFL offense. Watson will not be ready to take the reigns by game one and will not take the reigns barring injuries. Not under O'brien.
3. Savage (and probably Weeden) will simply be better QB's than Watson on game one and probably through out they year.
The Texans drafted one QB under BoB and it was Savage and Savage is going into his 4 year in this system. That's pretty normal it takes about 3 to 4 years to have a complete mental grasp of the offense where you don't have think so much. You can just read, make adjustments and calls and not be tryiing to remember the language.
4. The Texans don't suck, and are a veteran team and a defensive team.
They are playing to win now. They are not going to throw in a raw rookie QB when they are looking to win now and one of the prime objectives of the Texan O at this time under BoB, is TAKE CARE OF THE BALL, run the ball, a PRO STYLE OFFENSE WITH A PRO STYLE QB. I don't BoB is going to want Watson running the ball much.
5. I am not convinced that Watson is more talented as Qb then Savage even after some developement, And I can assure both Savage and Weeden are better QB than Watson for BoB's system at this time and probably for the year.
I Don't really understand where the idea that Savage sucks is coming from. The guy has played less then 8 quarters of football and last year he really showed some flashes of being a sound if not really good NFL QB. He had no pics and an 80.9 rating last year and won two games. It seems to me that most here think that he has 'maxed out' on his potential. I think that's dumb analysis. I think he will get better with more PT. Oh and Savage has a better and more accurate arm than Watson.
Also let's not forget that BoB is really holding a tight leash on Savage when he was in, pounding into his head "TAKE CARE OF THE BALL" staying very conservative. It was easy to tell that Savage was playing not to make a mistake or turn the ball over, the first half of both games and the O was like zelch, that was on O'brien IMHO he played the game very close to vest. Trying to get in the playoffs and mainly wanting his young Qb to not lose the game! The game plan was to let the defense win and run the ball and grind out a win. In the second half of both wins Savage played much much better. Basically BoB does not trust rookies and he is just now getting to where he will loosen the reigns some for Savage as he is coming into his 4th year. Why in the world BoB had Savage run a QB sneak for first down in a meaningless game is beyond me.
Remember Savage will come in getting all the starters reps for the first time, and the Osweiler drama is gone. He comes in 'the guy' it's his job to lose with BoB actually showing some confidence in him and has named him the starter and barring injury that is what is going to happen and as long as the Texan's win or Savage does show signs of suckage, he will stay the starter. I also think some Savage's injuries come from trying to prove himself. The guy is a competitor and I saw that from his tape form Pitt. He has to get smarter about getting rid of the ball and not taking hits he doesn't need to take. I expect that to happen this year.
Bottomline, everyone is assuming that Savage is going to not be good. I am not so sure, and I actually think Savage will get better the more he plays. Barring injury
Watson is obviously more mobile and is a winner, but there a lot winning successful college QBs that didn't do much in the Pro's. The game is so much faster, the decision making has to be quick, decisive and sound and the throw has to be accurate. It's very hard to asses those skills and they have to be developed.
Ryan34 said:
If Texans were really that comfortable with Savage, why sign Brock and then trade up for a QB? Has Savage ever been legitimately good (as opposed to simply better than Brock) even when healthy?
Because Brock was seen as being a huge improvement over Savage at that time. Both were young guys, but Brock had more playing time under his belt and saw decent success, whereas Savage dealt with injuries every year.Ryan34 said:
If Texans were really that comfortable with Savage, why sign Brock and then trade up for a QB? Has Savage ever been legitimately good (as opposed to simply better than Brock) even when healthy?
History has shown that the best experience for a young QB might be sitting on the bench for at least half a season.k20dub said:Ryan34 said:
If Texans were really that comfortable with Savage, why sign Brock and then trade up for a QB? Has Savage ever been legitimately good (as opposed to simply better than Brock) even when healthy?
Seriously. This is a playoff team even with a carousel at QB. We might as well start Watson and let him get experience before the playoffs. I don't trust Savage in a playoff game.
W said:
I think the QB situation is going to take care of itself after week 3 at New England
Unless there is an injury, I think they're all wrong.LilSebastian13 said:
All three guys on NFL Live (Field Yates, Bruschi, Jeff Saturday) say they think Savage attempts less than 90 passes this year.
brotheraggie said:
Just moved from Houaton to San Antonio. This must be Dallas South with the amount of Cowboy fans in SA