***Official Early Vote Tracking***

219,137 Views | 1657 Replies | Last: 10 min ago by fightingfarmer09
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Just plugged the latest Arizona reports in.


Friday morning update from Arizona:



Republicans expand their lead another 20K and leading votes cast by over 8%. They are not also outpacing the Democrats on turnout for the first time. With a registration advantage of nearly 300,000 in Arizona now, obviously the gap will only grow in numbers in Republicans continue to keep pace or outpace Democrats in turnout.
Saturday update from Arizona



Republicans added to their lead again over Democrats and are now outvoting them by 183K votes. Republicans are also starting to get space in turnout, pushing their turnout advantage up to .9%. Democrats were turning out at a slightly higher rate until yesterday. As I mentioned in my update yesterday, with Republicans now having a nearly 300,000 registration advantage, it becomes very difficult to find a path to victory for Harris when the Republicans are also voting at a higher rate than Democrats.

Small update from Arizona as a Pima and a few small rurals reported numbers today. Maricopa will not report again until tomorrow (Republicans currently are outvoting Dems by around 100,000 votes in Maricopa FYI).

Republicans add around 5K to their lead in votes cast and have surpassed a 1% turnout advantage now as well.

Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Just plugged the latest Arizona reports in.


Friday morning update from Arizona:



Republicans expand their lead another 20K and leading votes cast by over 8%. They are not also outpacing the Democrats on turnout for the first time. With a registration advantage of nearly 300,000 in Arizona now, obviously the gap will only grow in numbers in Republicans continue to keep pace or outpace Democrats in turnout.
Saturday update from Arizona



Republicans added to their lead again over Democrats and are now outvoting them by 183K votes. Republicans are also starting to get space in turnout, pushing their turnout advantage up to .9%. Democrats were turning out at a slightly higher rate until yesterday. As I mentioned in my update yesterday, with Republicans now having a nearly 300,000 registration advantage, it becomes very difficult to find a path to victory for Harris when the Republicans are also voting at a higher rate than Democrats.

Small update from Arizona as a Pima and a few small rurals reported numbers today. Maricopa will not report again until tomorrow (Republicans currently are outvoting Dems by around 100,000 votes in Maricopa FYI).

Republicans add around 5K to their lead in votes cast and have surpassed a 1% turnout advantage now as well.


Great news.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The rest:
Quote:

Trump's rally schedule over the final few days reveals a brilliant strategy: He is not going to North Carolina, Georgia, and Pennsylvania because he's worried about any of them. It's quite the opposite.

Winning those three states gets him to 270 electoral votes exactly and renders the rest of the swing states moot. Those three states are also in the Eastern time zone, which means they will likely report results the earliest.

Trump's goal is to run up the score as much as possible in those states so that the networks have no choice but to call them, and thus the election, for him relatively early on election night.

This is brilliant because it precludes the swing states from dragging out vote counting for days or even weeks (as has been suggested by multiple Democrats over the past month). If counts continue, fraudulent or questionable ballots can continue to flow in long after Election Day and could even tip a close state or two.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Or it could just be that flying 8 hrs RT to AZ or NV and back to the east coast swing states blows a lot of time that is in short supply.
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Holy crap!
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AtticusMatlock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's going there because those states get him to 270.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

The rest:
Quote:

Trump's rally schedule over the final few days reveals a brilliant strategy: He is not going to North Carolina, Georgia, and Pennsylvania because he's worried about any of them. It's quite the opposite.

Winning those three states gets him to 270 electoral votes exactly and renders the rest of the swing states moot. Those three states are also in the Eastern time zone, which means they will likely report results the earliest.

Trump's goal is to run up the score as much as possible in those states so that the networks have no choice but to call them, and thus the election, for him relatively early on election night.

This is brilliant because it precludes the swing states from dragging out vote counting for days or even weeks (as has been suggested by multiple Democrats over the past month). If counts continue, fraudulent or questionable ballots can continue to flow in long after Election Day and could even tip a close state or two.

Not only is it brilliant in depressing enthusiasm for cheating in the western swing states it also could potentially help flawed candidates like Lake in Arizona if the Dems aren't motivated to harvest more ballots or other nefarious tactics.

We must win the Senate with a nice enough margin to overcome RINO's so Trump can get meaningful legislation passed and we need to hang onto the House so we don't have endless impeachments from the idiots on the left.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

I know Trump doesn't have a prayer in California but just in terms of overall trends you have to like it.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump could also win WI as long as he wins GA, NC, AZ and get to 270

I think Halperin was saying they'd be shocked to see Kamala take WI at this point
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4stringAg said:

Trump could also win WI as long as he wins GA, NC, AZ and get to 270

I think Halperin was saying they'd be shocked to see Kamala take WI at this point
I think he's got AZ in the bag and probably GA too but NC is the wild card and likely the most important swing state.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am crunching numbers myself and just ran the numbers for Arizona and Nevada on turnout compared to 2020.

Here is what that shows

Arizona

Republicans: 101% of their 2020 early vote
Democrats: 79% of their 2020 early vote

Nevada

Republicans: 100% of their total 2020 early vote
Democrats: 80% of their total 2020 early vote

To go with the Florida and NC numbers I posted earlier, anyone notice anything? It is shockingly similar in each state.

Florida

Republicans: 101% of their 2020 early vote
Democrats: 74% of their 2020 early vote

North Carolina

Republicans: 101% of their 2020 early vote
Democrats: 83% of their 2020 early vote
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

I am crunching numbers myself and just ran the numbers for Arizona and Nevada on turnout compared to 2020.

Here is what that shows

Arizona

Republicans: 101% of their 2020 early vote
Democrats: 79% of their 2020 early vote

Nevada

Republicans: 100% of their total 2020 early vote
Democrats: 80% of their total 2020 early vote

To go with the Florida and NC numbers I posted earlier, anyone notice anything? It is shockingly similar in each state.

Florida

Republicans: 101% of their 2020 early vote
Democrats: 74% of their 2020 early vote

North Carolina

Republicans: 101% of their 2020 early vote
Democrats: 83% of their 2020 early vote

But how can we be sure there's not massive cannibalization?
BQRyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm just an average idiot, but it looks like the lead in republican early voting isn't due to republicans turning out early in some crazy way that would indicate possibly cannibalizing votes. It looks like the lead is due to lack of dem excitement and turnout.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because Republicans are voting in line with COVID 2020 numbers and still had an outsized performance on ED.

Democrats are underperforming their outsized 2020 numbers and will have to be find a way to get those people to the polls on ED.

Republicans are engaged and enthusiastic...
Democrats are absent and not enthusiastic....
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can never be sure, but there is some good data out there about Republicans turning out 0 and 1 voters (voted 0 or 1 time in last two mid terms and last two presidential election). Even if you are cannibalizing some, why aren't the Democrat voters turning out at same rate? And Democrats historically do not vote at same level as Republicans on election day. This tells me that Republicans are getting their early voters out and Democrats are not.

The data in other states is harder because no party registration. But these are four important states (FL is not a battleground anymore, but still). I find it hard to believe that this would be happening in isolation to just these states.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

You can never be sure, but there is some good data out there about Republicans turning out 0 and 1 voters (voted 0 or 1 time in last two mid terms and last two presidential election). Even if you are cannibalizing some, why aren't the Democrat voters turning out at same rate? And Democrats historically do not vote at same level as Republicans on election day. This tells me that Republicans are getting their early voters our and Democrats are not.

Hope so…

What worries me is I'm usually an ED voter…

This year…I voted early…
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It doesn't matter when someone votes as long as they vote. An EV in 2020 and ED vote 20204 is equal.
Toptierag2018
How long do you want to ignore this user?

[This is an early voting thread, not a polls thread. Stop derailing it -- Staff]
jr15aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All I can say is my republican women are NOT voting Dem!

That's 1 wife and 2 daughters that are pro life and Anti Harris.

+4 Trump for my house
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQRyno said:

I'm just an average idiot, but it looks like the lead in republican early voting isn't due to republicans turning out early in some crazy way that would indicate possibly cannibalizing votes. It looks like the lead is due to lack of dem excitement and turnout.
I was worried about that at first, but I think there are a ton of lower propensity voters showing up early. It's fantastic b/c it reduces the chances for shenanigans on ED without a chance to properly challenge/investigate. Time is on our side in that scenario.

Someone above mentioned worrying about the large number of independents in NC; I've got to believe that not only do they break with the more enthused side (GOP in this case), but I also think people will vote with their wallets in a tie-breaker scenario. Wasn't it CNN that said 28% of the country thinks we're on the right track? Yeah, I'm thinking the indies break two thirds to the right.

These early voting numbers are fantastic. Polls matter so much less when you see actual results like this banked.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dreyOO said:

BQRyno said:

I'm just an average idiot, but it looks like the lead in republican early voting isn't due to republicans turning out early in some crazy way that would indicate possibly cannibalizing votes. It looks like the lead is due to lack of dem excitement and turnout.
I was worried about that at first, but I think there are a ton of lower propensity voters showing up early. It's fantastic b/c it reduces the chances for shenanigans on ED without a chance to properly challenge/investigate. Time is on our side in that scenario.

Someone above mentioned worrying about the large number of independents in NC; I've got to believe that not only do they break with the more enthused side (GOP in this case), but I also think people will vote with their wallets in a tie-breaker scenario. Wasn't it CNN that said 28% of the country thinks we're on the right track? Yeah, I'm thinking the indies break two thirds to the right.

These early voting numbers are fantastic. Polls matter so much less when you see actual results like this banked.

General wisdom is that if a party is having low enthusiasm turnout, then the Indies who lean to that party will also have lower turnout.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well know Tuesday, but the fact that the dems are down is the important bit.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dreyOO said:

BQRyno said:

I'm just an average idiot, but it looks like the lead in republican early voting isn't due to republicans turning out early in some crazy way that would indicate possibly cannibalizing votes. It looks like the lead is due to lack of dem excitement and turnout.
I was worried about that at first, but I think there are a ton of lower propensity voters showing up early. It's fantastic b/c it reduces the chances for shenanigans on ED without a chance to properly challenge/investigate. Time is on our side in that scenario.

Someone above mentioned worrying about the large number of independents in NC; I've got to believe that not only do they break with the more enthused side (GOP in this case), but I also think people will vote with their wallets in a tie-breaker scenario. Wasn't it CNN that said 28% of the country thinks we're on the right track? Yeah, I'm thinking the indies break two thirds to the right.

These early voting numbers are fantastic. Polls matter so much less when you see actual results like this banked.
What's great about banking those low propensity voters early is those are exactly the type of voters who, on election day, are much more likely to leave a long line and not vote.

The Dems are going to have to spend a lot of time and money on ED motivating those low propensity voters on their side to vote. Republicans won't have to knock on as many doors because for high propensity voters you don't have to worry, they're going to vote regardless of how long the lines are. They'll just concentrate on the quad 2/3 voters.
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captn_Ag05 said:

You can never be sure, but there is some good data out there about Republicans turning out 0 and 1 voters (voted 0 or 1 time in last two mid terms and last two presidential election). Even if you are cannibalizing some, why aren't the Democrat voters turning out at same rate? And Democrats historically do not vote at same level as Republicans on election day. This tells me that Republicans are getting their early voters out and Democrats are not.

The data in other states is harder because no party registration. But these are four important states (FL is not a battleground anymore, but still). I find it hard to believe that this would be happening in isolation to just these states.
These group are using lists developed with the party that confirms who has voted with the SoS. Those lists will create a propensity based on how frequently you vote in federal elections. A high propensity voter has generally voted in at least 3 of the last 4 federal elections. Most campaigns can spend very limited resources on those voters to get them to the polls. That allows you to allocate resources in either getting those people to the polls or focus on more low pro voters.
ttha_aggie_09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
clw04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SwigAg11 said:

dreyOO said:

BQRyno said:

I'm just an average idiot, but it looks like the lead in republican early voting isn't due to republicans turning out early in some crazy way that would indicate possibly cannibalizing votes. It looks like the lead is due to lack of dem excitement and turnout.
I was worried about that at first, but I think there are a ton of lower propensity voters showing up early. It's fantastic b/c it reduces the chances for shenanigans on ED without a chance to properly challenge/investigate. Time is on our side in that scenario.

Someone above mentioned worrying about the large number of independents in NC; I've got to believe that not only do they break with the more enthused side (GOP in this case), but I also think people will vote with their wallets in a tie-breaker scenario. Wasn't it CNN that said 28% of the country thinks we're on the right track? Yeah, I'm thinking the indies break two thirds to the right.

These early voting numbers are fantastic. Polls matter so much less when you see actual results like this banked.

General wisdom is that if a party is having low enthusiasm turnout, then the Indies who lean to that party will also have lower turnout.
Democrats looking at early voting numbers are entirely basing their hope on Independents and Republicans vote for Kamala based on "abortion" and "democracy".
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
clw04 said:

SwigAg11 said:

dreyOO said:

BQRyno said:

I'm just an average idiot, but it looks like the lead in republican early voting isn't due to republicans turning out early in some crazy way that would indicate possibly cannibalizing votes. It looks like the lead is due to lack of dem excitement and turnout.
I was worried about that at first, but I think there are a ton of lower propensity voters showing up early. It's fantastic b/c it reduces the chances for shenanigans on ED without a chance to properly challenge/investigate. Time is on our side in that scenario.

Someone above mentioned worrying about the large number of independents in NC; I've got to believe that not only do they break with the more enthused side (GOP in this case), but I also think people will vote with their wallets in a tie-breaker scenario. Wasn't it CNN that said 28% of the country thinks we're on the right track? Yeah, I'm thinking the indies break two thirds to the right.

These early voting numbers are fantastic. Polls matter so much less when you see actual results like this banked.

General wisdom is that if a party is having low enthusiasm turnout, then the Indies who lean to that party will also have lower turnout.
Democrats looking at early voting numbers are entirely basing their hope on Independents and Republicans vote for Kamala based on "abortion" and "democracy".

The irony being that Harris at the top of the ticket is actually the antithesis of "democracy"…
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jr15aggie said:

All I can say is my republican women are NOT voting Dem!

That's 1 wife and 2 daughters that are pro life and Anti Harris.

+4 Trump for my house


Proud to say my whole family voted early….. young man by absentee from Annapolis. Oldest son from College Station, my wife, and my daughter. She turned 18 on Sunday and voted on Monday. We are all early voters, all voted for Trump, so +5 from here, but in Texas so not a big help where it's needed. Still. 3 new Trump votes this go around towards the National numbers.
jamieboy2014
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mslags97 said:

jr15aggie said:

All I can say is my republican women are NOT voting Dem!

That's 1 wife and 2 daughters that are pro life and Anti Harris.

+4 Trump for my house


Proud to say my whole family voted early….. young man by absentee from Annapolis. Oldest son from College Station, my wife, and my daughter. She turned 18 on Sunday and voted on Monday. We are all early voters, all voted for Trump, so +5 from here, but in Texas so not a big help where it's needed. Still. 3 new Trump votes this go around towards the National numbers.
It's needed ANYWHERE AND EVERYWHERE. We need to keep Texas blood red so the Dems don't ever try to take it seriously as a swing state.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.