***Official Early Vote Tracking***

165,614 Views | 1294 Replies | Last: 53 sec ago by Toptierag2018
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rononeill said:

So all of this early voting analysis y'all are posting is pretty favorable. But this IS Texags and, let's be honest, the smart people on here tracking this stuff are generally conservatively oriented so MAY have biased sources. Are there any left leaning analyses saying the same data is good for the Dems? I'm just scared of getting blindsided Tuesday night...


Most of the pollsters and numbers are still from left-leaning sources.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ruffini is pretty well respected in this field.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have to be careful interpreting what she means here. Basically, Trump's margins are much higher in WI/PA (more in the 800,000 range) compared to NC/GA (400,000 range). In other words, WI/PA are quickly getting out of reach for Harris, and it makes more mathematical sense to go after NC/GA due to needing half the raw vote counts.

JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That suburban Philly number is +85k for the GOP alone
RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JDUB08AG said:

That suburban Philly number is +85k for the GOP alone
Thanks for the info.
Toptierag2018
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SwigAg11 said:

Have to be careful interpreting what she means here. Basically, Trump's margins are much higher in WI/PA (more in the 800,000 range) compared to NC/GA (400,000 range). In other words, WI/PA are quickly getting out of reach for Harris, and it makes more mathematical sense to go after NC/GA due to needing half the raw vote counts.




Well that's a great sign for Trump because he's going to win Georgia
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She's not winning NC, from everything I have seen. Further, I don't see it even being that close. Trump wins that state easily.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I completely agree with you, and your comments exactly lead into the point she is making - Kamala's best path forward mathematically is to get NC/GA.

Edit: This aligns with Halperin's comments last night that party insiders on both sides have said they would be shocked if Harris won WI.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/events

Or…maybe it's thst he's campaigning in north NC that's only 40 minutes from the VA border so it acts as a 2 for 1.
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought she had pulled all of her money and ads from NC and shifted that to MI and PA?
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/events

Or…maybe it's thst he's campaigning in north NC that's only 40 minutes from the VA border so it acts as a 2 for 1.

One of his NC stops today is close to the VA border; the other is on the other side of the state to the south.

Edit: I should have read his event list all the way. His Sunday/Monday NC rallies are all in the interior of the state.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SwigAg11 said:

I completely agree with you, and your comments exactly lead into the point she is making - Kamala's best path forward mathematically is to get NC/GA.

Edit: This aligns with Halperin's comments last night that party insiders on both sides have said they would be shocked if Harris won WI.
I made the mistake of watching Halperin's evening stream last night. He had Jonathan Alter on the entire stream. Alter did nothing but trash talk Trump. To his credit, Halperin was trying to get him to tone it down but Alter just ignored him and talked over him constantly. It was a pretty disgusting. Alter defended the media taking Trump out of context on the warhawk Liz Cheney, claiming it was Trump's fault because of his "violent rhetoric."

Halperin, again to his credit, did say he found the media distorting Trump's words disgusting for journalism. Alter responded that since he was an "opinion journalist" he didn't need to be factual, ever.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm just saying, claiming he's solely focused on NC is wrong.

10 events.

VA: 1
NC/VA : 1
NC: 3
PA:3
GA:1
MI:1

That should tell you where his team thinks the path is.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mslags97 said:

I thought she had pulled all of her money and ads from NC and shifted that to MI and PA?


She didn't. That was a Trump narrative started by a Breitbart article. Sort of like the lefts narratives that Trump is exhausted or that no one goes to his rallies anymore. Campaigns always play these games. She will be in NC again this weekend.

In NC, independent/third party now lead Republicans and Democrats in early voting. I think that has made it difficult for either campaign to get a good feel for how it's actually going there.

MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In fairness, she dumped in $2.7 million in for ad buys, then the next day pulled out $2 million, so she is still has ads but far less than the $2.7 million she initially dumped in.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Clark County? That's all union based then. Members are being contacted and forced to fill out ballots. as the Trafalgar pollster told Bill O'Reilly always happens.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting to see the perspective from the other side Re: Nevada:



Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Toptierag2018 said:

SwigAg11 said:

Have to be careful interpreting what she means here. Basically, Trump's margins are much higher in WI/PA (more in the 800,000 range) compared to NC/GA (400,000 range). In other words, WI/PA are quickly getting out of reach for Harris, and it makes more mathematical sense to go after NC/GA due to needing half the raw vote counts.




Well that's a great sign for Trump because he's going to win Georgia


That's a pretty wild map
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Most of the pollsters posted have data to follow up their reasoning, may not be the most accurate but at least they are trying to prove their point. Swann Marcus is a hardcore leftist Bernie Bro and Biden lover that follows the young Turks. He comes off as someone that lives in his parents basement trying to find social media post to fight about.

He has a post where he thinks Harris will get over 330 and says it has been this way for months. The only people voting for Trump are betas. Yeah not a pollster by any means
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I saw plenty of posts on X that refuted everything he claims; his numbers and claims don't line up.

I can try to find them.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks. Was wondering where that guy came from.
Toptierag2018
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Philip J Fry said:

I'm just saying, claiming he's solely focused on NC is wrong.

10 events.

VA: 1
NC/VA : 1
NC: 3
PA:3
GA:1
MI:1

That should tell you where his team thinks the path is.



Yup, Wisconsin is in good shape so they want to make sure they lock down NC, GA, & PA.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That person isn't showing any stats. He is just talking about feel and what he thinks will happen.
newbie11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The reason I think trump will win is because a "friend" of mine who is an extreme liberal in DC, works for a lib think tank, has been posting a lot of early voting data on his fb page. His interpretations of the data seem desperate to me. That's as reliable as it gets imo.
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Freaking mail in.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
newbie11 said:

The reason I think trump will win is because a "friend" of mine who is an extreme liberal in DC, works for a lib think tank, has been posting a lot of early voting data on his fb page. His interpretations of the data seem desperate to me. That's as reliable as it gets imo.
My condolences
Ryan the Temp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:


You can thank Trump demonizing mail ballots for the last six years for the reduction in Republican mail ballots..
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yet more evidence as to Dem panic in minority/urban turnout;

samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ryan the Temp said:

Captn_Ag05 said:


You can thank Trump demonizing mail ballots for the last six years for the reduction in Republican mail ballots..
Citation needed as usual with your posts
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ryan the Temp said:

Captn_Ag05 said:


You can thank Trump demonizing mail ballots for the last six years for the reduction in Republican mail ballots..
Rs are still EV'ing at similar numbers as 2020 and more so by mail in certain states like NV and PA. Do you have any data to back up your statement?

Edit: The Trump campaign has made a HUGE push this time to vote early and for everyone to get their votes banked by ED.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SwigAg11 said:

Ryan the Temp said:

Captn_Ag05 said:


You can thank Trump demonizing mail ballots for the last six years for the reduction in Republican mail ballots..
Rs are still EV'ing at similar numbers as 2020 and more so by mail in certain states like NV and PA. Do you have any data to back up your statement?

He's on a roll.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ryan the Temp said:

Captn_Ag05 said:


You can thank Trump demonizing mail ballots for the last six years for the reduction in Republican mail ballots..
It is actually a significant increase in mail-in ballots for Republicans compared to prior cycles.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.