i won't claim to have ever thought that the MCU needed to add owen wilson (especially since he hasn't been in much lately). but pretty much from the first trailer he was in, i thought it was pretty obvious that he was going to be great in this role.Saxsoon said:
I never imagined that Owen Wilson would be one of the strongest aspects of this show.
redline248 said:I think there is a very, very small chance they actually exist. Too many things like "they're busy," and "they're in their chambers working hard." It's all very fishyQuote:
wondering if the time-keepers actually exist...or they have died and someone else is running everything behind the scenes.
we have talking trees, talking raccoons, a living planet, Pym particles, etc, and you have a problem with time-controlling space lizards?Fightin TX Aggie said:
Kang the Conqueror is already confirmed as a villain for the next Antman movie.
Maybe Kang gets introduced here.
There aren't three lizard timekeepers. Just one Kang.
bobinator said:
What are the current odds that the timekeepers exist? Like 20:1 against?
I don't have a problem with them, I just think they don't actually exist except as a front for someone else. Mobius's boss, I suspect, or her boss that we haven't met yet.C@LAg said:we have talking trees, talking raccoons, a living planet, Pym particles, etc, and you have a problem with time-controlling space lizards?Fightin TX Aggie said:
Kang the Conqueror is already confirmed as a villain for the next Antman movie.
Maybe Kang gets introduced here.
There aren't three lizard timekeepers. Just one Kang.
C@LAg said:we have talking trees, talking raccoons, a living planet, Pym particles, etc, and you have a problem with time-controlling space lizards?Fightin TX Aggie said:
Kang the Conqueror is already confirmed as a villain for the next Antman movie.
Maybe Kang gets introduced here.
There aren't three lizard timekeepers. Just one Kang.
Red Five said:
Or just 3 different versions of Kang - Kang, Immortus, and Rama-tut.
AgStuckinLBK said:Red Five said:
Or just 3 different versions of Kang - Kang, Immortus, and Rama-tut.
Maybe it's Kang, Kodos and some other alien from Rigel VII
bobinator said:
It's kinda fun?
New Rockstars mentioned that there's a little anti-technology vibe to this show. The high tech/digital stuff gets broken, busted, is worthless etc while the analog 'timeless' stuff always works and underlies the most powerful force in the universe.W said:
is there an explanation coming for why the TVA's computers and interior decors are 1970's vintage?
instead of 1950's or 1990's or 2010's, etc..,
AgStuckinLBK said:C@LAg said:we have talking trees, talking raccoons, a living planet, Pym particles, etc, and you have a problem with time-controlling space lizards?Fightin TX Aggie said:
Kang the Conqueror is already confirmed as a villain for the next Antman movie.
Maybe Kang gets introduced here.
There aren't three lizard timekeepers. Just one Kang.
The poster probably doesn't have a problem with it just saying factually they don't exist. They're just referenced to keep the small time people believing in something
i believe the director mentioned that he wanted to capture the bloated bureaucracy that has to deal with outdated equipment - vibe.W said:
is there an explanation coming for why the TVA's computers and interior decors are 1970's vintage?
instead of 1950's or 1990's or 2010's, etc..,
redline248 said:I think there is a very, very small chance they actually exist. Too many things like "they're busy," and "they're in their chambers working hard." It's all very fishyQuote:
wondering if the time-keepers actually exist...or they have died and someone else is running everything behind the scenes.
bobinator said:Seems to me the plot of this show will be for Loki to undo what she did, only to somehow do it himself.Quote:
So has the multiverse of madness now begun?
