Quote:
attacking Mond because of the actions of his ancestors is a particularly cruel ad hominum attack; since when is a person responsible for the sins of their ancestors?
Are you aware that John Singer, an Associate Dean at A&M, has co-authored an article which argues that Kyle Field should be renamed because Kyle's father fought in the Confederate army?
https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jsm/aop/article-10.1123-jsm.2019-0303/article-10.1123-jsm.2019-0303.xml?content=pdf-6970Kyle is guilty under the category of "racism through Confederate ties," according to the article:
Quote:
Utilizing a collective case study approach, the authors identified 18 facilities that were named after athletic administrators, coaches, and philanthropists who engaged in racist activities or harbored racist views.
E J Kyle had nothing to do with the Confederacy, but his father did, so the son is guilty of racism.
That's coming from an Associate Dean at Texas A&M.