Manchester United 2022-23 Thread

100,628 Views | 2000 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Dre_00
jeffk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's the same group that was rumored to be considering a Liverpool bid earlier. Obviously the names of all the stakeholders in the group aren't publicly available, but those that were listed by a couple of sources I read are all "government-adjacent" players in Qatar and neighboring nations. Seems as though this is the next move to avoid being a "state-run" club while still having access to shady funds from state sources. I hope the league does their due diligence for this sale and those coming soon after.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Government adjacent"? What is that? A nephew of the Emir? The Sheik's 4th brother?

Yeah. If it waddles like a duck and craps on the sidewalk like a duck, it's a duck.
jeffk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lol. Actually your hypotheticals are almost exactly right.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh I definitely wasn't joking. These are massive royal families that have been in control since the British left. It's still the Royals and it's still state owned.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

So the girlfriend and family dropped the charges. I'm sure they will be well compensated for their choices here.

What BS.
definitely money just like the Chris Beard situation. Beard's finance realized the money train would come to a halt and she comes out saying it was my fault and i never wanted him arrested. yada yada.
Aston94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Furlock Bones said:

Mathguy64 said:

So the girlfriend and family dropped the charges. I'm sure they will be well compensated for their choices here.

What BS.
definitely money just like the Chris Beard situation. Beard's finance realized the money train would come to a halt and she comes out saying it was my fault and i never wanted him arrested. yada yada.


Unlike the Beard situation, however, in that Greenwood's contract requires a conviction for termination.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aston94 said:

Furlock Bones said:

Mathguy64 said:

So the girlfriend and family dropped the charges. I'm sure they will be well compensated for their choices here.

What BS.
definitely money just like the Chris Beard situation. Beard's finance realized the money train would come to a halt and she comes out saying it was my fault and i never wanted him arrested. yada yada.


Unlike the Beard situation, however, in that Greenwood's contract requires a conviction for termination.
yea, i was reading that. on one hand, it seems appropriate to protect workers contracts from dubious legal claims. it is also hard to swallow when there is obvious wrong doing, yet nothing can be done. its probably better to err on side of the former.

Showstopper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So there's a significant chance Liverpool gets bought by Nephew Jerry Don Qatar and United gets bought by Nephew Jethro Qatar, who are both completely different and independent from Cousin Billy Bob Qatar who owns PSG.

Seems like a good system. Can't see any problems arising at all.
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dre_00 said:

McTominay, Martial, and Antony are out for tomorrow's game. Dalot made the bench against Palace but didn't see any minutes. Would be surprised if he started. But if everything is going well, I could see him coming on in the 60th as a planned sub...starting in the away game this weekend.

Does ETH go Fred and Sabitzer in the middle and pray to the gods above? Can he get anything close to 90 minutes from Sabitzer even if that makeshift pairing manages to not look completely overwhelmed defensively?

Sancho in for Antony? Elanga? With the form he is in, you gotta keep Rashford playing on the left but none of the options on the right seem to fit with ETH's preferred tactics.

It is indeed Fred and Sabitzer (Freditzer? SabiFred?) in the middle but Garnacho gets the start...presumably on the right. Would be nice if he could excel there.
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Both Sancho and AWB got sick. Sancho is well enough to make the bench (and sounds like he would have started if he was completely well). AWB didn't even make the bench. Let's hope Dalot's hammy holds up.
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1 ****ing minute
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And the FU Marsch regime took 55 seconds to come to fruition.
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They came out with their hair on fire for sure. Really really really wish they waited to fire Marsch
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leeds has always had attacking talent but their finishing has been suspect. Not today apparently.
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lucky to not be down 2 already. Bruno having a terrible first 10 minutes
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Garnacho has to score there. Brutal
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This game screams Rashford masterclass.
gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KCup17 said:

This game screams Rashford masterclass.
Well he just killed that guy
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gougler08 said:

KCup17 said:

This game screams Rashford masterclass.
Well he just killed that guy
Head shot. Just erased that mans memory of the last 6 hours.
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really not liking moving Rashford to accommodate Garnacho. Why move your in form player out of his position? Doesn't help that Garnacho has struggled mightily the first 20 minutes but still.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFC y'all are in luck because Leeds can't complete more than 3 passes without an unforced turnover.

They're as bad as my daughter high school team.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many open nets wlil Garnacho miss?
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Radio guys ripping Garnacho for diving.
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Absolutely hate that we swapped Rashford to the RW instead of just playing Garnacho there. Completely unnecessary
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
McKennie pretty close to a yellow for persistent infringement. He's been out of control a few times already
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our midfield is an existential thought experiment
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was pretty clearly a dive.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Massive and multiple dark arts by Martinez.. He raked Banford twice.
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

Massive and multiple dark arts by Martinez.. He raked Banford twice.
Cheeky cheeky
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just feels like one of those games where we dominate everywhere but the scoreline. Always happens when we give up an early goal
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why are Many and Leeds playing back to back matches?

Makeup from the funeral?
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
None of the Leeds tactics have changed. Its just high press and controlled chaos. And hope you dont give up horrible goals. The difference is its worked.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chuck Cunningham said:

Why are Many and Leeds playing back to back matches?

Makeup from the funeral?
Yes
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAggie2011 said:

Chuck Cunningham said:

Why are Many and Leeds playing back to back matches?

Makeup from the funeral?
Yes


Why put it in the same week?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.