This dopey indictment reads like a MSNBC or CNN slanted political narrative with errors of commission and omission! Did Jack Smith really pass the DC Bar ?
Trump Jan 6 sealed indictment delivered
132,488 Views |
1457 Replies |
Last: 13 days ago by will25u
It's what they want
Good. You and your ilk have dismantled the republic.Malibu said:
I wont be following this post up with any others.
I mentioned DeSantis supporters genius. Good to see you back at your old hypocritical self.Rapier108 said:The first person to mention DeSantis on this thread was Funky with an infantile nickname insult and blanket accusation which is demonstrably false.AGHouston11 said:Funky Winkerbean said:I didn't.Ellis Wyatt said:Don't make this about Trump vs. Desantis.Funky Winkerbean said:
Still don't think TDS is real? I'm sure the DeSantites are tickled ****less.
Exactly the usual same ones posting exactly the same on every thread did
And he keeps doubling down on it and now you're joining in because your cannot let your hated of DeSantis and his supporters out of your mind for 2 seconds.
I mentioned his supporters because like the people bringing forth these indictments, the DeSantites on this board suffer from TDS. Keep doubling down on your hypocrisy, you make my argument stronger.
Sounds like he'll need it at the rate he's digging into PAC funds to pay his legal bills. I'm just surprised he's paying his billsGeorgiAg said:
https://breaking911.com/watch-special-counsel-jack-smith-to-announce-new-trump-indictment/Reports are that a sealed indictment has JUST been returned to a magistrate judge. Names are sealed. We don't know who has been indicted. But we DO know that someone has been indicted. Now we wait and I will provide you will all the updates. But for now, I'm thinking of my heroes
— Victor Shi (@Victorshi2020) August 1, 2023BREAKING: It's Official:
— SIR MAEJOR - AMERICA FIRST 🇺🇸 (@REALSIRMAEJOR) August 1, 2023
The Grand Jury has just handed up an indictment in the 2020 Election Interference case. (Almost certainly Trump).
The case is being put under seal and a summons will be issued shortly.
I will tell you right now. If this was Joe Biden getting… pic.twitter.com/iBqJ308gLF
Trump will raise 11ty billion in donations.... again.
The digs at Smith are hilarious. The guys a conservative who's doing his job but it wouldn't matter if St Petter was special council. People would hate anyone they perceive to be attacking Trump. I only run in conservative circles and there are 2 groups, those of us who think it is highly likely Trump is guilty in some of the indictments but would vote for him if no other choice, and those that believe every indictment is a conspiracy but wouldn't care if he was guilty. They're not coming for, they're not coming for me…They're coming for Trump. And if you think they are coming for you, Trump wouldn't stand in the way if it didn't benefit him but would likely throw you under the busoysterbayAG said:
This dopey indictment reads like a MSNBC or CNN slanted political narrative with errors of commission and omission! Did Jack Smith really pass the DC Bar ?
It's the Biden family that doesn't pay their bills...or taxes.Quote:
Sounds like he'll need it at the rate he's digging into PAC funds to pay his legal bills. I'm just surprised he's paying his bills
Read the indictment. What does any of the actual charges have to do with Jan 6th? Nothing.
And that whole "conspiracy to defraud the US" BS? Team Mueller always included that amorphous charge that never made any sense but when Jack Smith manages to stretch that already tortured construction to that point?
I disagree with the government's position. The government, "You are DEFRAUDING THE GOVERNMENT!!! REEEEE!"
So now MediCare fraud is what Trump was charged with? He made false statements on federal forms that caused the US government to miss money owed? Or paid to him under false pretexts?
That is why when Team Mueller tried the same crap, they seldom won.
And that whole "conspiracy to defraud the US" BS? Team Mueller always included that amorphous charge that never made any sense but when Jack Smith manages to stretch that already tortured construction to that point?
I disagree with the government's position. The government, "You are DEFRAUDING THE GOVERNMENT!!! REEEEE!"
So now MediCare fraud is what Trump was charged with? He made false statements on federal forms that caused the US government to miss money owed? Or paid to him under false pretexts?
That is why when Team Mueller tried the same crap, they seldom won.
We've crossed the rubicon with this.
Sailed off the map into uncharted waters.
Nobody knows what we are likely to see from here on out. Went off script.
So anything could happen from this point forward.
Sailed off the map into uncharted waters.
Nobody knows what we are likely to see from here on out. Went off script.
So anything could happen from this point forward.
Trump is not a conservative. He's a scam artist. Everyone in my NY Republican family knew that. The indictment simply details Trump's litany of abuse of power and grifting scams before and through J6. I truly feel sorry for people who can't see through him.
Trump is every Hank Haney (Green Acres) or carpetbagger who ever lived.
Reagan threw Trump out of the WH, shortly before Trump then visited Russia in 1987.
Trump is every Hank Haney (Green Acres) or carpetbagger who ever lived.
Reagan threw Trump out of the WH, shortly before Trump then visited Russia in 1987.
Touche.LegalDrugPusher said:If you haven't committed a single, he hasn't committed any so there's no way he's committed multiple2040huck said:Agrred. MultipleLegalDrugPusher said:Trump hasn't committed a single crimeWrec86 Ag said:How many crimes can a person commit?agAngeldad said:
How many times can they indicte a person?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
LOL. Apparently he was done using any rational thought before he opened his mouth.oh no said:Every democrat:Wrec86 Ag said:How many crimes can a person commit?agAngeldad said:
How many times can they indicte a person?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Hurd is just another blowhard cookie cutter bureaucrat that thinks he's more special than he is, and he exhibits the same swampy characteristics I despise.
New York republicans exist?DukeMu said:
Trump is not a conservative. He's a scam artist. Everyone in my NY Republican family knew that. The indictment simply details Trump's litany of abuse of power and grifting scams before and through J6. I truly feel sorry for people who can't see through him.
Trump is every Hank Haney (Green Acres) or carpetbagger who ever lived.
Reagan threw Trump out of the WH, shortly before Trump then visited Russia in 1987.
Old May Banker said:I suspect most all conservatives agree with this.Barnyard96 said:
Im pulling for Desantis and i think this indictment is bull****
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
But…but…Jack Smith is just a conservative doing his job. Joe Biden is of sound mind and looking out for poor poor Hunter whose trying to be sober.
DukeMu said:
Trump is not a conservative. He's a scam artist. Everyone in my NY Republican family knew that. The indictment simply details Trump's litany of abuse of power and grifting scams before and through J6. I truly feel sorry for people who can't see through him.
Trump is every Hank Haney (Green Acres) or carpetbagger who ever lived.
Reagan threw Trump out of the WH, shortly before Trump then visited Russia in 1987.
Trump would have run as a Democrat if he thought he could win. He has zero political convictions, nor moral ones.
Honestly, the indictment is very damning and detailed. I encourage you all to actually read it - instead of just reading tweets and listening to echo chambers reactions. And while you're reading it, I would encourage you to imagine how you would feel if a Democrat who lost an election had done those things (there is very good evidence cited in this indictment). Would you think they were crimes? The party I don't like winning an election does not remotely justify Trump's actions, and the fact that some of you legitimately believe that is scary (although not shocking, unfortunately). If we actually go down that path America is dead.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of responses about Hunter Biden or something. Hunter Biden is a **** head. He has committed crimes. He deserves to be punished accordingly. Still, nothing he has done is even within an order of magnitude of what is laid out in this indictment.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of responses about Hunter Biden or something. Hunter Biden is a **** head. He has committed crimes. He deserves to be punished accordingly. Still, nothing he has done is even within an order of magnitude of what is laid out in this indictment.
It Aint Easy Being Brown said:
Hopefully they leave it up so everyone can see you adoring that inane Victor shi tweet
His hero is Jamie Raskin...a guy that apparently loses his hearing every time evidence is presented against the Bidens. The unrestrained lying on the left is so bad, nobody notices it.
Hunter? No, JOE has committed crimes. LMAO.
Gordo14 said:
Honestly, the indictment is very damning and detailed. I encourage you all to actually read it - instead of just reading tweets and listening to echo chambers reactions. And while you're reading it, I would encourage you to imagine how you would feel if a Democrat who lost an election had done those things (there is very good evidence cited in this indictment). Would you think they were crimes? The party I don't like winning an election does not remotely justify Trump's actions, and the fact that some of you legitimately believe that is scary (although not shocking, unfortunately). If we actually go down that path America is dead.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of responses about Hunter Biden or something. Hunter Biden is a **** head. He has committed crimes. He deserves to be punished accordingly. Still, nothing he has done is even within an order of magnitude of what is laid out in this indictment.
What laws did he break? As for your second question, you must mean how did I feel when Gore contested the election? There are many other examples. Which one do you want my feelings on?
I didn't see the word insurrection anywhere in the indictment. Guess I missed it
Yo Gordo, I'll go with Turleys opinion on the matter. He's a left-wing con law profession.
Sterling82 said:Gordo14 said:
Honestly, the indictment is very damning and detailed. I encourage you all to actually read it - instead of just reading tweets and listening to echo chambers reactions. And while you're reading it, I would encourage you to imagine how you would feel if a Democrat who lost an election had done those things (there is very good evidence cited in this indictment). Would you think they were crimes? The party I don't like winning an election does not remotely justify Trump's actions, and the fact that some of you legitimately believe that is scary (although not shocking, unfortunately). If we actually go down that path America is dead.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of responses about Hunter Biden or something. Hunter Biden is a **** head. He has committed crimes. He deserves to be punished accordingly. Still, nothing he has done is even within an order of magnitude of what is laid out in this indictment.
What laws did he break? As for your second question, you must mean how did I feel when Gore contested the election? There are many other examples. Which one do you want my feelings on?
Do your own homework and read the indictment.
Gordo14 said:
Honestly, the indictment is very damning and detailed. I encourage you all to actually read it - instead of just reading tweets and listening to echo chambers reactions. And while you're reading it, I would encourage you to imagine how you would feel if a Democrat who lost an election had done those things (there is very good evidence cited in this indictment). Would you think they were crimes? The party I don't like winning an election does not remotely justify Trump's actions, and the fact that some of you legitimately believe that is scary (although not shocking, unfortunately). If we actually go down that path America is dead.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of responses about Hunter Biden or something. Hunter Biden is a **** head. He has committed crimes. He deserves to be punished accordingly. Still, nothing he has done is even within an order of magnitude of what is laid out in this indictment.
You mean like HRC in 2016? She made up and colluded with the doj/fbi to make up a fake story and lead to the first impeachment of Trump.
Gosh your hypocrisy is nauseating
I'm all in on Desantis and, while many of his policies were commendable and over all a huge positive for the country I've never much cared for Trump as a person or the trumpkins who worship at his alter.
That being said, when you indite someone, much less the former president of the United States for his speech I don't really see how this country can recover. Justice is no longer blind.
That being said, when you indite someone, much less the former president of the United States for his speech I don't really see how this country can recover. Justice is no longer blind.
Gordo14 said:
Honestly, the indictment is very damning and detailed. I encourage you all to actually read it - instead of just reading tweets and listening to echo chambers reactions. And while you're reading it, I would encourage you to imagine how you would feel if a Democrat who lost an election had done those things (there is very good evidence cited in this indictment). Would you think they were crimes? The party I don't like winning an election does not remotely justify Trump's actions, and the fact that some of you legitimately believe that is scary (although not shocking, unfortunately). If we actually go down that path America is dead.
I'm sure I'll get a lot of responses about Hunter Biden or something. Hunter Biden is a **** head. He has committed crimes. He deserves to be punished accordingly. Still, nothing he has done is even within an order of magnitude of what is laid out in this indictment.
Trump was the president. He didn't call out the military to protect him, he didn't refuse to leave office, and he didn't commit any crimes. He used his voice to challenge a political issue that was corrupt as hell. If we don't have the 1st amendment of speech then let's pack it up and say bye to the house. You sir are reading garbage and believing it.
Pretty clear who is the greatest threat to the elite class.
lol, this is not progressive elite 4d chess wanting President Trump to win the nomination cause he can't beat FJB.
This is fear.
lol, this is not progressive elite 4d chess wanting President Trump to win the nomination cause he can't beat FJB.
This is fear.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley: "I think that the indictment does not have this compelling level of evidence." pic.twitter.com/RRRF7IGPQS
— MAGA War Room (@MAGAIncWarRoom) August 1, 2023
Special Counsel Jack Smith just issued the first criminal indictment of alleged disinformation in my view. If you take a red pen to all of the material presumptively protected by the First Amendment, you can reduce much of the indictment to haiku...
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) August 1, 2023
...The press conference held by Smith only deepened the unease for some of us. Smith railed against the January 6th riot and made it sound like he was indicting Trump on incitement. He didn't. The disconnect was glaring and concerning.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) August 1, 2023
Andy McCarthy pours cold water on Jack Smith's latest prosecution of Trump: "He has extravagantly stretched these statues in order to try to capture this behavior and that's because this is really a proxy for what should have been a political impeachment process..." pic.twitter.com/CtDDOSSzOd
— Kevin Tober (@KevinTober94) August 1, 2023
CondensedFogAggie said:ChemEAg08 said:CondensedFogAggie said:
Yep try to illegally take over a democratic election by instigating a hostile takeover of our capitol? You getting arrested son.
Deep down you all know its legit, you don't like being one of your own facing justice. And keep whining about marxist while ironically red states are jobless dreamless struggling places that live of federal aid supplied by blue state taxes!
But hey I'm sure some kid on Twitter will reveal this is a grand globalist plot from hillary being orchestrated from the basement of a Dallas Torchy's Tacos by the big illuminati cabal, so stay tuned!
Hostile in that he said to peacefully demonstrate at the capital and not a signal firearm was found on any demonstrators. Only firearm used was by a police officer to kill a 100 lbs Air Force veteran woman.
Ah so we pro crime and property invasion now? Funny considering the one of the things I agree with here is that the law and police have to be respected, drug dealers should be incarcerated for a long, long time, etcl
Yet you vote for politicians that do the exact opposite of that. Does it hurt to be such a fool? Just another blind sheep.
It could not be more clear on crime vs crime depending on which side you vote for. I'm still sunned that a lawyer started this thread. Apply the law equally or we are done as a country.
GeorgiaAg? LOL. He MAY be licensed but he practices in a niche area of law, like public utilities or some sort.FriscoKid said:
It could not be more clear on crime vs crime depending on which side you vote for. I'm still sunned that a lawyer started this thread. Apply the law equally or we are done as a country.
Not a trial attorney. Not an appellate attorney. Certainly not an election law attorney. (I did the first two but then I actually worked as a lawyer.)
Had some friends who ended up being corporate attorneys. They never stepped foot in a court room. They "did lunch" and the "cocktails" and then "dinner."
Rainmakers have a purpose. Why Boies Schiller put him on the mast head but never expected him to actually work. His value was bringing clients because of who he was.
Acually common. In DC? Standard. It is not like David Boies was such a great attorney. He sucked during the Bush v. Gore cases. Awful.
Featured Stories
See All
16:53
31m ago
579
Key Matchups: No. 15 Texas A&M at Auburn
by Olin Buchanan
66:03
17h ago
8.7k
21:31
1h ago
1.4k
37:53
16h ago
1.1k
Reed Report: Chatting with D-Kirk, recapping A&M's 4-0 home stand
by Luke Evangelist