Watermelon Man said:
jrdaustin said:
Watermelon Man said:
aginlakeway said:
Watermelon Man said:
aginlakeway said:
Watermelon Man said:
Im Gipper said:
Watermelon Man said:
Im Gipper said:
Quote:
I feel confident that the immunity ruling will get overturned
Under what circumstances?
I truly believe that sanity will return to the Supreme Court. It may take a while, but I have faith that it will happen. The idea of Presidential Immunity for Criminal Acts is so Anti-American that either it will be rejected by The People, or The People will no longer define America.
"Nonresponsive"
I'm going to guess that by this response, you mean that there are no circumstances where sanity will return to the Supreme Court.
A boy can hope, can't he?
What's your opinion on the timing of all of this be released?
Two weeks.
What's your opinion on the timing of why this was released yesterday?
By "this" I have to guess (because you are vague about it) that you mean the unsealing of Smith's brief. The timing has everything to do with how long it took to rule on the motions, and nothing else.
If you think you're convincing anyone other than yourself with your fanciful interpretations, you're sorely mistaken.
You are lost in a liberal fantasyland, and it's a sad sight to see.
Well, you tell me. Should the Judge make the ruling before the brief was filed? Or, should a reasonable amount of time, say two weeks, have been allowed to pass before making a ruling?
Or, are you suggesting the ruling was incorrect and obviously politically biased? If that's the case, then it isn't the timing that is the issue, but the actual ruling.
If the timing is the issue, you need to look at the timing of the Supreme Court decision.
I will tell you. You're obviously enjoying yourself playing in the weeds. But this case was never about law enforcement. As with all the other massively "reach" allegations against Trump, this whole political theatre playing both in AND out of a courtroom is simply that. Political Theatre.
Smith is using the same playbook that Bragg used. Use a novel unprecedented applicaton of law to create a vague allegation of criminality that has never been used before, even though the same scenario has played out mutiple times before in American politics. But now, use a compliant judge and political system to "try" the allegations in public and damage the candidate. (This is also the same playbook that was used for the two impeachments while Trump was in office.)
THIS is the objective of Smith, and the DC court system here. This whole thing is not about law enforcement. It never has been.
Now I know you have a diffferent opinion, and you're welcome to it. But understand that I'm not going to continue to argue with you, as I suspect both by your posts, and the time you are spending here, that:
- A. You are not a graduate of Texas A&M. and
- B. You are here to troll, rather than make reasoned arguments; and, you are possibly being paid to do so.
