RockTXAggie said:
Let's review the facts surrounding 9/11.
So we're supposed to believe that several planes were hijacked by cave dwelling Afghani amateur pilots that were able to perfectly execute a crash landing into the pentagon, one of the most heavily surveilled buildings in the entire world. Yet we somehow don't have clear footage.
They also ran two planes perfectly into the WTC towers. The jet fuel apparently burned so hot that it weakened the structural integrity to the point that they both fell at free fall speed perfectly into their own footprint.
Oh and one of those planes happened to pull off the perfect 7-10 split and catch WTC7 a few blocks away on fire and it too fell perfectly into its own footprint.
How is it wrong to question the supposed chain of events?
Yes, you're supposed to believe that because its all FACT.
The people that did the hijacking were almost all Saudis, not Afghani, and none of them were cave dwellers. The ones that flew the planes all had SOME pilot training. They weren't accomplished pilots, but they knew stick and rudder, at least. They didn't "execute a crash landing" into the Pentagon; they crashed AA 77 into it at high speed, and the Pentagon's security had no bearing on that. There were dozens of witnesses to the plane crashing, including many that were in traffic and almost hit by the plane. There were AA plane parts on the ground at the Pentagon. There's no doubt what happened at the Pentagon. Your assertion that the Pentagon is "one of the most heavily surveilled buildings in the entire world" is without authority. The other evidence speaks for itself. The lack of clear footage is due to the speed of the plane. The FASTER speed of a missile would not have been captured any clearer.
Neither of the two WTC planes were "ran perfectly" into either building. The United flight darn near missed WTC 2. The AA flight hit higher than what I assume they wanted. Maybe they didn't know how things would shake out, but as it happened, the direct impact took out all means of escape for anyone above the impact zone in WTC 1. Had they known that and been able to do anything about it, they would have aimed for at least 10-15 floors lower. Its doubtful that they could have gone lower than that given the plane's speed and altitude. They could have easily killed 2K more people.
The buildings didn't fall into "their own footprint." They fell, beginning at the
impact zone of each building, which would have been impossible to predict ahead of time. WTC 2 fell off to the side. I believe it was the one that took out the WTC Marriott. And it wasn't just the jet fuel igniting fires that weakened the steel. The aluminum from the plane made the fires much hotter than first thought. THAT created the near perfect storm that ultimately brought down the buildings. Did the hijackers know this? I seriously doubt it. In their mind, the planes would knock the buildings over like one would fell a tree from the trunk. But many people would have thought that.
WTC 7 was NOT a "few blocks away." It was a street over and was heavily damaged by the collapse of WTC 1. As far as falling onto itself, it gave way on the inside of the building and there was no reason it would fall onto any other building. No one has ever explained the sinister reasoning behind demolishing WTC 7 on 9/11. They've just assumed it happened because they don't understand the full reasoning or don't want to believe the facts. But that isn't evidence of plot or cover-up.
You can question all you want, but you can't (at least and be honest) make things up and present them as truth. Here are your answers. They are documented at hundreds, if not thousands, of sites.
The United flight that crashed in PA shows what would have happened had the passengers known of their ultimate fate on the earlier flights. The hijackers depended on all the events going off without passengers on their planes finding out about the other planes. This alone proves there wasn't any official complicity. Surely it wouldn't have been difficult to disable the passenger communication system on the planes, thus making others aware of their fate impossible. There were calls from every single plane that was hijacked that day. Heck, that would have been the easiest of all things to do.
And the thing is this: if the Shanksville flight had not crashed, how were the conspirators to know that they wouldn't have been killed from that plane crashing into them?(Also could have been asked about AA77). Not everyone could be in the WH bunker.
