DogHouse95 said:
There should be a "conspiracy theorist" tag, so I know what level of credibility to give to certain posters on discussed topics.
Four planes.annie88 said:
He really believes that Americans did not die in three different planes?
Maybe he needs to talk to the families of those lost.
RockTXAggie said:DogHouse95 said:
There should be a "conspiracy theorist" tag, so I know what level of credibility to give to certain posters on discussed topics.
We should also have non-conspiracy theorist tags so I know which people will believe literally anything they are told.
The complexity of the conspiracy theories, the illogical reasoning of the motives, the amount of people it would involve with no whistleblowers and the lack of coherent, reasoned "alternative" theories all mean this theories stand no chance of withstanding critical analysis.RockTXAggie said:
What's perplexing to me is how quick people dismiss 9/11 and other conspiracy theories considering what the government just did to us with COVID over the last 2.5 years. The American government is full of straight up evil people.
It's false flag 101. Create a tragedy so tragic that it's blasphemous to question.
Raiderjay said:
I am no conspiracy theorist, but I don't believe anything told to us about the Vegas shooter.....
Strike one!Quote:
cave dwelling Afghani amateur pilots
Strike 2!Quote:
both fell at free fall speed perfectly into their own footprint.
Strike 3!Quote:
WTC7 a few blocks away
Which facts? All the items I just quoted are incorrect and are not what's in the report. Maybe you should purchase a copy and read it.RockTXAggie said:
New World, those are the facts as they were presented to us. I'm merely questioning them.
New World Ag said:Which facts? All the items I just quoted are incorrect and are not what's in the report. Maybe you should purchase a copy and read it.RockTXAggie said:
New World, those are the facts as they were presented to us. I'm merely questioning them.
Martin Q. Blank said:There was a Boeing 757 found at the exact location where the Pentagon blew up.Gyles Marrett said:
Unless someone can factually prove a conspiracy was wrong with evidence I don't doubt peoples conspiracies anymore after the last 2 years.
New World Ag said:
Sure, why not? I did when it came out years ago. It's a good read that made my blood boil and eyes water.
It was a bipartisan commission. But since you think it was an "inside job", then you must believe that the Democrats went along with Evil George's plan. Well, at least that proves bipartisanship is still around!
You think the Democrats wouldn't want to pin the greatest crime against the US on Bush and the GOP?RockTXAggie said:New World Ag said:
Sure, why not? I did when it came out years ago. It's a good read that made my blood boil and eyes water.
It was a bipartisan commission. But since you think it was an "inside job", then you must believe that the Democrats went along with Evil George's plan. Well, at least that proves bipartisanship is still around!
Both parties are chock full of evil people, including the Bush family.
New World Ag said:You think the Democrats wouldn't want to pin the greatest crime against the US on Bush and the GOP?RockTXAggie said:New World Ag said:
Sure, why not? I did when it came out years ago. It's a good read that made my blood boil and eyes water.
It was a bipartisan commission. But since you think it was an "inside job", then you must believe that the Democrats went along with Evil George's plan. Well, at least that proves bipartisanship is still around!
Both parties are chock full of evil people, including the Bush family.
Well when you over simplify everything....RockTXAggie said:
Let's review the facts surrounding 9/11.
So we're supposed to believe that several planes were hijacked by cave dwelling Afghani amateur pilots that were able to perfectly execute a crash landing into the pentagon, one of the most heavily surveilled buildings in the entire world. Yet we somehow don't have clear footage.
They also ran two planes perfectly into the WTC towers. The jet fuel apparently burned so hot that it weakened the structural integrity to the point that they both fell at free fall speed perfectly into their own footprint.
Oh and one of those planes happened to pull off the perfect 7-10 split and catch WTC7 a few blocks away on fire and it too fell perfectly into its own footprint.
How is it wrong to question the supposed chain of events?
RockTXAggie said:SociallyConditionedAg said:waitwhat? said:
To be clear what I'm saying is that your government lies to you on a regular basis and some people are too foolish to recognize it. They've been hooked by the media's mockery of those that recognize the intent of powerful people as folks that wear tinfoil hats.
Fools. Absolute fools.
This. Building 7 just happened to fall perfectly on its own without being touched by a plane? We may never know the real story, but it's obvious that the government lied to us.
Exactly. Just using basic common sense, 9/11 doesn't add up.
Satellite of Love said:Well when you over simplify everything....RockTXAggie said:
Let's review the facts surrounding 9/11.
So we're supposed to believe that several planes were hijacked by cave dwelling Afghani amateur pilots that were able to perfectly execute a crash landing into the pentagon, one of the most heavily surveilled buildings in the entire world. Yet we somehow don't have clear footage.
They also ran two planes perfectly into the WTC towers. The jet fuel apparently burned so hot that it weakened the structural integrity to the point that they both fell at free fall speed perfectly into their own footprint.
Oh and one of those planes happened to pull off the perfect 7-10 split and catch WTC7 a few blocks away on fire and it too fell perfectly into its own footprint.
How is it wrong to question the supposed chain of events?
Also, there wasn't a perfectly executed crash landing into the pentagon. It was a near 360 turn to lose altitude before slamming into the building. Why would the outside of the building be heavily surveilled? This is 2001 we are talking about. America wasn't an intricate network of CCTV. The Pentagon was well enough isolated that it didn't require cameras looking at every angle of the exterior.
1 of the 2 planes that hit the WTC nearly missed the tower. It's impact zone was near a corner. We are talking about a 200' wide target where precision flight isn't a requirement to hit. Like driving a car you look off into the distance and drive at the object in the distance. They also didn't fall perfectly into their own footprint....
that is literal insanityRockTXAggie said:DogHouse95 said:
There should be a "conspiracy theorist" tag, so I know what level of credibility to give to certain posters on discussed topics.
We should also have non-conspiracy theorist tags so I know which people will believe literally anything they are told.
TexasAggie_02 said:
the pentagon is effing huge, it's a quarter-mile across. the big white blur in that video that they claim is a "missile" is an airplane taken on video with a ****ty frame rate. If it had been a missile, it would have been really hard to see on that quality of video.
These people think that scud, cruise, and tomahawk missiles have a similar diameter to commercial airliners...I've seen it over and over again through the years.TexasAggie_02 said:
the pentagon is effing huge, it's a quarter-mile across. the big white blur in that video that they claim is a "missile" is an airplane taken on video with a ****ty frame rate. If it had been a missile, it would have been really hard to see on that quality of video.
TexasAggie_02 said:
the pentagon is effing huge, it's a quarter-mile across. the big white blur in that video that they claim is a "missile" is an airplane taken on video with a ****ty frame rate. If it had been a missile, it would have been really hard to see on that quality of video.
2001 camera tech (actually probably mid-1990s) vs. 2022 camera tech.RockTXAggie said:TexasAggie_02 said:
the pentagon is effing huge, it's a quarter-mile across. the big white blur in that video that they claim is a "missile" is an airplane taken on video with a ****ty frame rate. If it had been a missile, it would have been really hard to see on that quality of video.
My ADT home security has a better frame rate than the Pentagon. That's sick.
RockTXAggie said:TexasAggie_02 said:
the pentagon is effing huge, it's a quarter-mile across. the big white blur in that video that they claim is a "missile" is an airplane taken on video with a ****ty frame rate. If it had been a missile, it would have been really hard to see on that quality of video.
I'm merely saying the totality of all the events don't add up to me. We can dissect each individual occurrence from that day but the fact is ALL of these events happened on the same day with precision. The undertaking of all of those events is daunting when you think about it.
Rapier108 said:2001 camera tech (actually probably mid-1990s) vs. 2022 camera tech.RockTXAggie said:TexasAggie_02 said:
the pentagon is effing huge, it's a quarter-mile across. the big white blur in that video that they claim is a "missile" is an airplane taken on video with a ****ty frame rate. If it had been a missile, it would have been really hard to see on that quality of video.
My ADT home security has a better frame rate than the Pentagon. That's sick.
Squadron7 said:RockTXAggie said:TexasAggie_02 said:
the pentagon is effing huge, it's a quarter-mile across. the big white blur in that video that they claim is a "missile" is an airplane taken on video with a ****ty frame rate. If it had been a missile, it would have been really hard to see on that quality of video.
I'm merely saying the totality of all the events don't add up to me. We can dissect each individual occurrence from that day but the fact is ALL of these events happened on the same day with precision. The undertaking of all of those events is daunting when you think about it.
You know what is more daunting?
Getting the number of people who would have to go along with the sort of cover-up you are suggesting to keep silent. How many thousands do you think that would have to be? Maybe tens of thousands.
