The Spurs track record for finding starting caliber in the late 20s is pretty impressive. I have to believe they had a list of guys they were looking to move up for and they either came off the board or they just couldn't find a viable trade partner.AggieEP said:
Overall, hard to say it wasn't a great draft because the Spurs get Wemby, but I spent so long hoping for some bold moves, that draft night ended up feeling flat because the Spurs traded away 33 for basically nothing.
I get the whole roster spots issue, but that also makes the argument that packaging 44 and 33 plus something else to move up to the 20s would have been smart. I think Nick Smith Jr is going to be a star although his character is questionable, but once he was available I was really hoping the Spurs would grab him.
I think that is exactly right. They probably had a list of a few guys.Ag Natural said:The Spurs track record for finding starting caliber in the late 20s is pretty impressive. I have to believe they had a list of guys they were looking to move up for and they either came off the board or they just couldn't find a viable trade partner.AggieEP said:
Overall, hard to say it wasn't a great draft because the Spurs get Wemby, but I spent so long hoping for some bold moves, that draft night ended up feeling flat because the Spurs traded away 33 for basically nothing.
I get the whole roster spots issue, but that also makes the argument that packaging 44 and 33 plus something else to move up to the 20s would have been smart. I think Nick Smith Jr is going to be a star although his character is questionable, but once he was available I was really hoping the Spurs would grab him.
The complaint here isn't so much about the move per se, but rather that I was expecting/hoping for some more bold moves and when they didn't happen it made it feel like kind of a let down. Basically, the moves look logical, and I accept that you don't just trade up to trade up... but it just seemed like we have the ammunition in assets right now to get almost anyone we wanted, and instead we give up 33 for two second round picks which will both likely be lower than 33 when they convey.Sher Thing said:
The talent level in the draft really dropped off after pick 17 IMO. You don't just trade up to trade up. I really don't think anyone was worth trading up for. They weren't going to touch Whitmore after all his red flags and after Wallace, Dick, Bufkin, George, and JHS were off the board I didn't really see anyone worth going for. I'll be a critic of the front office at times but I don't really see the complaint here.
They very well might be lower than 33, but probably not by much because Minnesota is a ****ing dumpster fire.AggieEP said:The complaint here isn't so much about the move per se, but rather that I was expecting/hoping for some more bold moves and when they didn't happen it made it feel like kind of a let down. Basically, the moves look logical, and I accept that you don't just trade up to trade up... but it just seemed like we have the ammunition in assets right now to get almost anyone we wanted, and instead we give up 33 for two second round picks which will both likely be lower than 33 when they convey.Sher Thing said:
The talent level in the draft really dropped off after pick 17 IMO. You don't just trade up to trade up. I really don't think anyone was worth trading up for. They weren't going to touch Whitmore after all his red flags and after Wallace, Dick, Bufkin, George, and JHS were off the board I didn't really see anyone worth going for. I'll be a critic of the front office at times but I don't really see the complaint here.
Undrafted center Charles Bediako out of Alabama agrees to a one-year deal with the San Antonio Spurs, his agent Daniel Green of @greensportsmgmt tells @NBAonTNT, @BleacherReport.
— Chris Haynes (@ChrisBHaynes) June 23, 2023
Guitarsoup said:They very well might be lower than 33, but probably not by much because Minnesota is a ****ing dumpster fire.AggieEP said:The complaint here isn't so much about the move per se, but rather that I was expecting/hoping for some more bold moves and when they didn't happen it made it feel like kind of a let down. Basically, the moves look logical, and I accept that you don't just trade up to trade up... but it just seemed like we have the ammunition in assets right now to get almost anyone we wanted, and instead we give up 33 for two second round picks which will both likely be lower than 33 when they convey.Sher Thing said:
The talent level in the draft really dropped off after pick 17 IMO. You don't just trade up to trade up. I really don't think anyone was worth trading up for. They weren't going to touch Whitmore after all his red flags and after Wallace, Dick, Bufkin, George, and JHS were off the board I didn't really see anyone worth going for. I'll be a critic of the front office at times but I don't really see the complaint here.
Brian Wright was interviewed and he basically said that the team wants to see how Wemby adjusts and how the team plays together and then make acquisitions based on needs once they see guys play together.
I think the Spurs will be looking to use assets in February and June, but we may be making some moves prior to the season, since we have to hit the salary floor before Nov 1.
Cam Johnson is a stretch 4. Josh Hart plays the same position as Devin Vassell. I'll bet you we do not make an offer to either.AggieEP said:
To me, that's tanking by another name. We know how the pieces we have fit, they are a bottom 3 team that is horrendous on defense.
The front office can say things like "finding fit" all they want, but we all know the team is short wing defenders that can shoot and a lead guard. I won't need to watch 40 games to know that.
Now if they sign Josh Hart and Cam Johnson or someone similar, I'll gladly eat crow, but this doesn't seem like it'll be the case.
First one that’s not photoshopped 😏 pic.twitter.com/AjnMi3y1YK
— San Antonio Spurs (@spurs) June 24, 2023
Back like we never left @MalakiBranham pic.twitter.com/ZUut8mgqIp
— Jake Spegal (@JakeSpegal270) June 24, 2023
Back like we never left @MalakiBranham pic.twitter.com/ZUut8mgqIp
— Jake Spegal (@JakeSpegal270) June 24, 2023
Cissoko is answering questions in English, French and Spanish.
— Jeff McDonald (@JMcDonald_SAEN) June 24, 2023
The Spurs have done well with tri-lingual second-round picks in the past.
Victor Wembanyama announces he wants to retire before he turns 40.
— Mike Finger (@mikefinger) June 24, 2023
So did a lot of us, kid.
Wembanyama Go Spurs Go - Mariachi Campanas De América pic.twitter.com/zUIKU54Xfp
— David Gerardo. Escamilla (@Cougars4L) June 23, 2023
I like Reaves, but I just can't see committing 100mm to a guy with such a tiny sample size. Also, his defense is below average and we need perimeter defense in the worst way.Enzo The Baker said:
Great write up Soup. Would love to get Bruce Brown. Reaves would be my first choice but not realistic. If we can get Conley for a couple seconds that would be great too.
He definitely has good vision and passing, but his defense is not so great. We just need to upgrade defense so bad. Wemby helps, but we need to get better all over.West Texan said:
Am I the only one that would like to bring Mamu back? I love me some bigs with good court vision.
oh dang, Kevin Hart and Muggsy Bogues too. All great role models! pic.twitter.com/KHLy4UHUHl
— Mitchell Cohen (@MitchellLandon) June 25, 2023
Guitarsoup said:He definitely has good vision and passing, but his defense is not so great. We just need to upgrade defense so bad. Wemby helps, but we need to get better all over.West Texan said:
Am I the only one that would like to bring Mamu back? I love me some bigs with good court vision.
I like Mo Bamba (at least theoretically) because he can hit 3s, so you can get him out of the way, and hopefully drag his man away, too but he is a pretty solid rim defender and shot blocker.
He's not going to keep the ball moving like Mamu, but he can get out of the way for Wemby, Keldon, Branham, Vassell but make the other team pay if they leave him open.
Bamba hit 41% of his catch and shoot threes last year and 42% when wide open. The year before he was 39% on catch and shoot and 42% on wide open. He's basically a poor man's shot blocking version of Bruce Bowen.