I think the main one is shipwrecked crew on X. He's probably right, though I would note that he has gotten very…negative with a ton of people over the past year. Everyone is on his 'I hate that person' list it seems;aggiehawg said:Link? TIA.Quote:
Look, January 6 defense lawyers have repeatedly asked people to stop giving her the time of day. That ought to clue folks in to not get their "news and analysis" from her.
Well, lets be fair.@dbongino has a lot in common with that second group you described. So he's really defending himself by implication. https://t.co/CtgnInaaDp
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 6, 2024
aggiehawg said:Link? TIA.Quote:
Look, January 6 defense lawyers have repeatedly asked people to stop giving her the time of day. That ought to clue folks in to not get their "news and analysis" from her.
So @julie_kelly2 continues to mischaracterize my comments while at the same time blocking me so that I cannot see what she writes or respond to her errors.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) June 27, 2024
She has blocked me because she knows my command of the subject matter means I know when she makes a mistake even when she… pic.twitter.com/wdS6bdkxqO
I've had numerous people reach out to me and tell me how Julie has burned them in the past 6 months.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) June 17, 2024
She is completely captured by her newfound celebrity and her ego is just off the charts. https://t.co/uO62Kndtu2
I just finished about a 600 word X post explaining why @Julie_Kelly2 is still wrong, and why her post today taking a paragraph from the Trump defense filing yesterday is another example of her not understanding what she is reading.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) June 15, 2024
But I'm sitting in LAX between two nearly 6…
Apparently, @julie_kelly2 is continuing to say publicly that various individuals she calls "former feds" are actually working against conservative politicians and the GOP -- I'm guessing on behalf of the "Uniparty" and "Deep State" according to her.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) June 5, 2024
My guess is this has proven…
Bongino has been telling people not to donate to Shipley's legal defense fund since at least June and Shipley has 30 J6 clients that have asked for respresentation.nortex97 said:I think the main one is shipwrecked crew on X. He's probably right, though I would note that he has gotten very…negative with a ton of people over the past year. Everyone is on his 'I hate that person' list it seems;aggiehawg said:Link? TIA.Quote:
Look, January 6 defense lawyers have repeatedly asked people to stop giving her the time of day. That ought to clue folks in to not get their "news and analysis" from her.Well, lets be fair.@dbongino has a lot in common with that second group you described. So he's really defending himself by implication. https://t.co/CtgnInaaDp
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) September 6, 2024
There are 100 other people posting the documents on Twitter and there are other websites where one can get the documents. Still, I appreciate that she is sharing them and that's good and well. But her commentary attached is often full of factual inaccuracies, yet alone is her analysis of the "facts" something anyone should rely on for their understanding of these cases.jt2hunt said:
I know that Julie Kelley puts a lot of information out there and includes documents from the court filings. People can come to their own conclusions about what that means but at least she's putting the information out there. Her commentary may or may not be right on the subject matter, but the content is there for the reader to decide.
Merchan will rule on Trump's motion to set aside the jury verdict and dismiss the indictment on November 12.
— Molly Crane-Newman (@molcranenewman) September 6, 2024
Trump will be sentenced on November 26 "if necessary"
will25u said:
Another win for Trump. Trump is STILL not what the D's so badly wanted him to be for the election.Merchan will rule on Trump's motion to set aside the jury verdict and dismiss the indictment on November 12.
— Molly Crane-Newman (@molcranenewman) September 6, 2024
Trump will be sentenced on November 26 "if necessary"
It just means they figured out the polling of sending him to Rikers was going to landslide him to an even larger victory.aggiehawg said:
Can't say I am surprised that Merchan backed down here. He put himself in the hole but has decided to stop digging it deeper.
“Unfortunately, we are now at a place in time that is fraught with complexities rendering the requirements of a sentencing hearing, should one be necessary, difficult to execute.”https://t.co/kyZIb8z6aL
— Molly Crane-Newman (@molcranenewman) September 6, 2024
Quote:
On July 21, 2024, President Joe Biden announced that he would not seek a second term. Within a few days, Vice President Kamala Harris was anointed to become the Democrat Party's nominee for the presidency. During his campaign, President Biden used one company, Amazon Web Services (AWS), for the campaign's web hosting services.1 President Biden's campaign paid AWS throughout 2023 through the suspension of his campaign in July 2024. On August 20, 2024, Vice President Harris's campaign submitted its first Federal Election Commission (FEC) report that documented expenses and donations through July 31, 2024. In the report, specifically on Form 3P, line 232, a July 30, 2024, disbursement appears in the amount of $468.00 from Vice President Harris's campaign to Authentic Campaigns Inc. (Authentic) for web hosting services. This indicates that one of the very first things that Harris did upon taking over the Biden campaign infrastructure is to hire this firm, Authentic.
Authentic is a digital consulting and marketing firm that services Democrat candidates. Loren Merchan, Justice Merchan's daughter, is its president. Vice President Harris changed web hosting companies from AWS to Authentic immediately after becoming the presumptive Democrat presidential nominee. As the FEC report's filing did not occur until August 20, nearly a month after the Harris campaign and Authentic had begun doing business, no one in the public, including the Commission, could have known of the relationship. This is merely the beginning of a new contract with a new campaign, regardless of the amount reimbursed. Sure, there's an immediate benefit, but this is a play at a potential larger benefit for Authentic and Merchan down the road.
🚨🚨🚨 Today I filed a new judicial ethics complaint with the New York State Commission because new evidence on Kamala Harris’ most recent FEC filing shows she hired and paid Acting Justice Juan Merchan’s adult daughter’s company. This is a clear violation of the New York State… pic.twitter.com/Il7PwjSXIR
— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) September 6, 2024
100% this.nortex97 said:It just means they figured out the polling of sending him to Rikers was going to landslide him to an even larger victory.aggiehawg said:
Can't say I am surprised that Merchan backed down here. He put himself in the hole but has decided to stop digging it deeper.
That wouldn't work for multiple reasons, and I think is probably based on an incorrect understanding of what he was found guilty of.MarkTwain said:
There's a pretty good argument going on on X platform about the boot strapping of the misdemeanor with a federal crime that he could pardon he federal crime with the boot strap would be gone. Then as to whether or not the original misdemeanor hold water and effect on the SOL.
Note: The defense opposes the Special Counsel’s request to file such an oversized brief and has asked to have until Tuesday at 5 pm to submit a written opposition. 2/
— Lisa Rubin (@lawofruby) September 21, 2024
This proposed 180 page brief and “proffer” by Jack Smith is the epitome of an unconstitutional violation of Trump’s 5th and 6th Amendment rights. The evidence supporting this filing consists of secret grand jury testimony and Form 302 summaries of FBI interviews. None of that was…
— Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) (@KingMakerFT) September 22, 2024
will25u said:This proposed 180 page brief and “proffer” by Jack Smith is the epitome of an unconstitutional violation of Trump’s 5th and 6th Amendment rights. The evidence supporting this filing consists of secret grand jury testimony and Form 302 summaries of FBI interviews. None of that was…
— Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) (@KingMakerFT) September 22, 2024
None of which will be leaked to the public, right.TXAggie2011 said:will25u said:This proposed 180 page brief and “proffer” by Jack Smith is the epitome of an unconstitutional violation of Trump’s 5th and 6th Amendment rights. The evidence supporting this filing consists of secret grand jury testimony and Form 302 summaries of FBI interviews. None of that was…
— Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) (@KingMakerFT) September 22, 2024
This is nonsense. To be clear, there is no jury, they're not admitting evidence. They're submitting a pre-trial under seal and redacted brief for the judge to make an evidentiary ruling about the actual underlying evidence. Happens in any criminal trial of any complexity.
Dems will love this: Trump cites Comey as evidence that DOJ should stick to the 60-day rule avoiding impactful actions prior to the election. https://t.co/cLhjVajypO pic.twitter.com/JacqAfmwWh
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) September 23, 2024
JUST IN: Judge Chutkan has *granted* Jack Smith's proposal to submit a 180-page brief full of evidence related to Trump's criminal charges in Washington, D.C.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) September 24, 2024
She again says Trump's claim this would be unfair politically has no bearing on her ruling.https://t.co/CwyrKa1eRt pic.twitter.com/Cr1WlPdC9K
Mandamus for a judge allowing an over-length brief? I guess it'll give him something to yell about when the Circuit Court denies it in a two sentence order.Quote:
Does Trump seek mandamus to DC Circuit? No reason not to!
Quote:
but when there's a massive mismatch between what scotus actually wrote and what the district court wants to think scotus wrote,
SCOTUS said was it was remanding the case to the District Court to receive briefing from the parties and perform a "factbound analysis" considering "the content and context" of the conduct.Im Gipper said:Did SCOTUS address the procedure for deciding immunity issues? I don't recall seeing that.Quote:
but when there's a massive mismatch between what scotus actually wrote and what the district court wants to think scotus wrote,
Oh, and I'm with you on "length of brief" not being the real issue here!
Quote:
The analysis therefore must be fact specific and may prove to be challenging. The indictment reflects these challenges. It includes only select Tweets and brief snippets of the speech Trump delivered on the morning of January 6, omitting its full text or context. Whether the Tweets, that speech, and Trump's other communications on January 6 involve official conduct may depend on the content and context of each. Knowing, for instance, what else was said contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was involved in transmitting the electronic communications and in organizing the rally, could be relevant to the classification of each communication. This necessarily factbound analysis is best performed initially by the District Court. We therefore remand to the District Court to determine in the first instance whether this alleged conduct is official or unofficial...
the lack of factual analysis by the lower courts, and the absence of pertinent briefing by the parties thus become more prominent. We accordingly remand to the District Court to determine in the first instance with the benefit of briefing we lack whether Trump's conduct in this area qualifies as official or unofficial.
It's not the real issue here and 2011 knows it.Im Gipper said:Quote:
but when there's a massive mismatch between what scotus actually wrote and what the district court wants to think scotus wrote,
Did SCOTUS address the procedure for deciding immunity issues? I don't recall seeing that.
Oh, and I'm with you on "length of brief" not being the real issue here!
And the media will cherry pick statements out of context to "prove" that Trump is guilty...ThunderCougarFalconBird said:
To be completely candid, this is outside of my practice area. The whole point of this exercise at this juncture is to try to squeeze the last few drops of political value left out of this case. Once the election is over, that value drops to zero.
If smith files a 180 page brief, the left will lap it up as gospel and the right will roll their eyes.
