AggiEE said:
Our resident official story conspiracy theorists ignore the most plausible explanation for those collapses, which is controlled demolition, and is corroborated by the physical evidence and basic common sense. We have controlled demolition experts saying within certainty that WTC7 is 100% a controlled demolition, and yet to believe NIST you have to run through all sorts of mental gymnastics to think that one column alone expanded and brought the entire structure to the point of collapse (yet global collapse was never studied).
They should have made the buildings out of passports instead of steel, given that a passport from one of the alleged hijacker's is sturdy enough to survive the plane impact, fire, and land pretty well in tact at ground level and yet you can only find the tiniest of bone fragments for the vast majority of those in the towers.
These sort of arguments should be embarrassing for the author, but delusion in some run deep they would rather live in an obviously fictional la la land.
We have a few control demolition "experts" who have their own theories that they discuss likely to amuse themselves and their friends then sit back and watch gullible folks lap it up.
What you fail to see is that not believing your conspiracy theories in nonsense does NOT mean I or anyone else trusts the government explicitly and believe beyond all doubt they would never lie to us.
I can simultaneously believe the election of 2020 has some major issues and was at least manipulated for Biden, I can believe we were massively mislead and duped on COVID, and I can also believe 09/11 was an act of planned terrorist attacks using hijacked airplanes.
There were more than just "the tiniest of bone fragments" found for a great number of people. The comment on the passport ignores physics. That passport was traveling at several hundred miles per hour and forward of the fuel on the plane. It is entirely reasonable, if not expected, that pieces of the plane and its occupants would travel through the building and out the other side.
Again, is a low q argument to accuse anyone who doesn't latch on to your teet as being a lactose intolerant milk hater.
"The absence of the word accountability is not the same as wanting no accountability" -unknown
"You can never go wrong by staying silent if there is nothing apt to say" -Walter Isaacson