If DC wants to jump start their rebuild then they need to immediately sign Pierre, Fillion, and Chandler to a long contract.
mnetop said:AgGrad99 said:
I also like that they didnt find the lantern yet. Adds some additional suspense, since they're running out of time.
would have been too convenient to wrap it up in one episode.
Agreed, but that 5% charge that was activated after digging the grave sure is lasting a long time....
mnetop said:AgGrad99 said:
I also like that they didnt find the lantern yet. Adds some additional suspense, since they're running out of time.
would have been too convenient to wrap it up in one episode.
Agreed, but that 5% charge that was activated after digging the grave sure is lasting a long time....
dave94 said:mnetop said:AgGrad99 said:
I also like that they didnt find the lantern yet. Adds some additional suspense, since they're running out of time.
would have been too convenient to wrap it up in one episode.
Agreed, but that 5% charge that was activated after digging the grave sure is lasting a long time....
It's only draining more when ghost-Hal is actually there. He himself said they had like an hour of "talk time" lol.
FL_Ag1998 said:dave94 said:mnetop said:AgGrad99 said:
I also like that they didnt find the lantern yet. Adds some additional suspense, since they're running out of time.
would have been too convenient to wrap it up in one episode.
Agreed, but that 5% charge that was activated after digging the grave sure is lasting a long time....
It's only draining more when ghost-Hal is actually there. He himself said they had like an hour of "talk time" lol.
They also have established a way around that little dilemma...John is space Jesus and can produce a construct without a ring.
Camo said:
Always serious, always objective, he does it so well.
FL_Ag1998 said:
Yep, I was including that in my statement...John not only maintained construct Hal after taking off the ring, but in the earlier episode John maintained a construct bird for hours and hours (days?) while being a thousand miles away from the ring.
AgGrad99 said:
More Guy?
I'm not a big DC fan in general, so I haven't seen him in anything other than the latest superman. But he looks like an out of shape dad, who dressed up as the green lantern on Halloween, to make his kids happy. He just seems so out of place, compared to everyone else. I just can't buy him as a superhero.
One man's opinion, but to me...he was bad casting.
Lathspell said:
Am I the only one left feeling kind of off, after this season?
I have a hard time believing Jon Stewart is a good guy. So, he covers up the murder of Hal Jordan, steals his ring, and uses a lantern built by Sinestro to power it? How are any of these things the actions of a hero at the end of his character arc?
And we, as the audience, are supposed to buy this idea that the first manhunter killing all these people in the town is the fault of Hal Jordan?
This just doesn't feel like the actions of a hero. This is more along the lines of an anti-hero, which I never thought Green Lantern was meant to be. This feels more like a character in line with the Punisher or Venom than what I understood a Green Lantern to be.
Quote:
I have a hard time believing Jon Stewart is a good guy. So, he covers up the murder of Hal Jordan, steals his ring, and uses a lantern built by Sinestro to power it? How are any of these things the actions of a hero at the end of his character arc?
Lathspell said:
Am I the only one left feeling kind of off, after this season?
I have a hard time believing Jon Stewart is a good guy. So, he covers up the murder of Hal Jordan, steals his ring, and uses a lantern built by Sinestro to power it? How are any of these things the actions of a hero at the end of his character arc?
And we, as the audience, are supposed to buy this idea that the first manhunter killing all these people in the town is the fault of Hal Jordan?
This just doesn't feel like the actions of a hero. This is more along the lines of an anti-hero, which I never thought Green Lantern was meant to be. This feels more like a character in line with the Punisher or Venom than what I understood a Green Lantern to be.
Quote:
Even John's speech about how Hal went against all the Lanterns stand for seems such a stretch.
AustinScubaAg said:Lathspell said:
Am I the only one left feeling kind of off, after this season?
I have a hard time believing Jon Stewart is a good guy. So, he covers up the murder of Hal Jordan, steals his ring, and uses a lantern built by Sinestro to power it? How are any of these things the actions of a hero at the end of his character arc?
And we, as the audience, are supposed to buy this idea that the first manhunter killing all these people in the town is the fault of Hal Jordan?
This just doesn't feel like the actions of a hero. This is more along the lines of an anti-hero, which I never thought Green Lantern was meant to be. This feels more like a character in line with the Punisher or Venom than what I understood a Green Lantern to be.
I am right here with you on this.
I feel like the worst thing Hal did in the series was leave John in the car. Hal being held responsible for the Manhunters actions just made no sense. Even John's speech about how Hal went against all the Lanterns stand for seems such a stretch.
CharleyKerfeld said:Quote:
I have a hard time believing Jon Stewart is a good guy. So, he covers up the murder of Hal Jordan, steals his ring, and uses a lantern built by Sinestro to power it? How are any of these things the actions of a hero at the end of his character arc?
Knowing Hal and knowing Kerry the way he does, it's doubtful Hal would have wanted her arrested for his murder. There's nothing to be gained there, other than more hurt.
John is then acting with is own moral compass in taking the ring and the lantern. He's breaking "the rules" of the Lantern Corps but those rules are created by Guardians who are some shady mofos who pushed his parents to raise him to be a slave to the Guardians' oversight, then tried to get him to kill Hal Jordan, and never once gave him a clear picture of what was going on.
He sides with the people of Earth as opposed to the Galactic Lords and decides he can avoid what happened to Hal by focusing only on the planet he's from rather than zooming around the galaxy and getting jaded over time.
His decisions with Noah and Noah's decisions with him are the real proof of this. If the Guardians knew a second manhunter was on Earth, they'd send wave after waves of GLs to put him down. But John is able to recognize that Noah, despite his nature, is an innocent. He has had bad ideas and even taken steps towards them, but hasn't gone through with any of them. John and Hal are told that Manhunters are relentless killing machines, which they can be, but both of them have also witnessed Manhunters being compassionate and benevolent on Earth. At the end, John decides to stop being a soldier and start being a leader.
FL_Ag1998 said:CharleyKerfeld said:Quote:
I
Manhunters are deceivers and manipulators. For example, the granny manhunter manipulated that whole town in order to stay hidden and protected - purely out of self-interest, not because she was compassionate and benevolent. That was made clear by the fact that whenever she helped someone it was a quid pro quo agreement. She helped them so that in return she could use them to help her later. She was essentially a mix of a cult leader and mafia boss.
That was made very clear, so the best explanation for the ending is actually that Noah easily manipulated simpleminded John, just like John was manipulated by Noah's granny manhunter.
schmendeler said:
There was manhunter in that little town for decades(?) and the killing only started when that alien crew looking for revenge showed up. So perhaps the rhetoric about manhunters being remorseless killing machines was wrong or at least not 100% fact.