Agree. We have a governor who is allowing teachers to not work from the classroom. Take that mandate away and teachers will be in their room teaching kids. Our governor has said teachers are more precious/important than daycare workers.
planoaggie123 said:
Agree. We have a governor who is allowing teachers to not work from the classroom. Take that mandate away and teachers will be in their room teaching kids. Our governor has said teachers are more precious/important than daycare workers.
TXTransplant said:planoaggie123 said:
Agree. We have a governor who is allowing teachers to not work from the classroom. Take that mandate away and teachers will be in their room teaching kids. Our governor has said teachers are more precious/important than daycare workers.
I kind of expect politicians to be hypocritical and out of touch elitists.
But given the number of "regular" people I've seen lecturing us all on the evils of "privilege" over the past few months, this whole situation with schools has left me speechless and disgusted. It's like I'm living in a Monty Python movie.
planoaggie123 said:
Agree. We have a governor who is allowing teachers to not work from the classroom. Take that mandate away and teachers will be in their room teaching kids. Our governor has said teachers are more precious/important than daycare workers.
planoaggie123 said:
Funding.
planoaggie123 said:
I want him to cut funding if schools dont offer in-person teaching...yes.
That is a thoughtful post. The logistical nightmare that all of the mitigation strategies we will use to control and contain the virus will make effective instruction nearly impossible for many teachers. I will not be able to place my students in groups, I don't know how close I should be from a student. Proxmity is such a powerful tool for classroom management and conferencing. The mitigation measures will not only affect instructional efficacy, but they will be detrimental to emotional growth also.tysker said:
If you want to be in the classroom and believe online learning is detrimental to children, are willing to take a stand against ISD requiring virtual mandates? How about social distancing and mask requirements that can cause unnecessary mental and emotional fatigue, confusion and fear (not unlike lockdown drills). I am unable to understand how the current 'safety' proposals square with providing the best education to students especially given the science, data and knowledge we have gained over the last several months. I think some have admitted fear has taken hold even in the face of data. That is not how science works and it's unfortunate that fear is being promoted, even advocated, by the same people and system that we have asked to teach our kids how to use and understand science, analytical thinking and fact-based decision making.
Clearly many want to be in the classroom but it kind of comes across that they will do so only in the manner preferable to themselves, not in a way the best suits the needs and development of the students. Believe me when I say, I appreciate your efforts and passion and I completely understand you are not in charge of the framework and are working within limited choices. Poor choices at that. However, the system and leadership doesn't appear to be putting the educational needs of the students first and any business or organization that has employees putting themselves ahead of its clients is easily corrupted and ultimately doomed to fail.
This is not the only aspect of the argument but it is definitely one of the issues.Quote:
What is also interesting to me is the pervasive nationwide attack on teachers and the public education system for as long as I've be in the classroom prior to the virus. Now, when campuses are potentially going to close, teachers are essential to the social, emotional, and intellectual growth of their students, and distance learning is going to cause irreparable damage to children's growth. They cynic in me wants to think that the outcry for students to be on campus is more about having a free babysitter rather than the quality of instruction they will receive.
Fenrir said:
I'd be curious to see if private school enrollments are increasing. I suspect the answer to that will not jive with the accusation that people only want a "free" babysitter.
TEA is not going to "hammer" them. Its an election year, nobody is going to pull school funding during an election year in a potential battle ground state. You thought COVID was a political football wait and see if or when the state comes up for grabs from an electoral math perspective.HowdyTexasAggies said:planoaggie123 said:
I want him to cut funding if schools dont offer in-person teaching...yes.
And, or, they should also cut funding for districts like AISD. They are saying they are offering in person, but sending a kid to one class room, holding them there all day, making them do online from that classroom is not in person instruction.
I hope TEA hammers them. Hopefully AISD parents will rise up and sue them.
Don't misunderstand me. I recognize how essential schools are to our economy. I know how the system works and recognize the investment people have in their districts and the unspoken contract that we have with the community.planoaggie123 said:This is not the only aspect of the argument but it is definitely one of the issues.Quote:
What is also interesting to me is the pervasive nationwide attack on teachers and the public education system for as long as I've be in the classroom prior to the virus. Now, when campuses are potentially going to close, teachers are essential to the social, emotional, and intellectual growth of their students, and distance learning is going to cause irreparable damage to children's growth. They cynic in me wants to think that the outcry for students to be on campus is more about having a free babysitter rather than the quality of instruction they will receive.
Dual income families look towards having their kids in school so they can earn a living. They pay taxes to fund that ability (i do realize many people pay taxes and either dont have kids or put kids in private school but doesnt change the argument). If that ability to drop their kids off at school is taken away they potentially lose a source of vital income all while continuing to pay (taxes) for a service not being provided.
Call it babysitting if you want but people rely on having somewhere to put their kids for the day and pay taxes for that right.
planoaggie123 said:
Well i am not going to say that many people's opinion on the quality of education is changing because of the pandemic.
But regardless of ifyoupeople like how the teacher does or not, they need to have their kids in school. It is how our society is set up and people make life decisions based on them being open and available.
Edit: change 'you' to 'people' as this isnt directed to you obiously....
I think that's much worse than doing distance learning from home. At least at home kids are free to move around, go outside, and interact with other humans.HowdyTexasAggies said:planoaggie123 said:
I want him to cut funding if schools dont offer in-person teaching...yes.
And, or, they should also cut funding for districts like AISD. They are saying they are offering in person, but sending a kid to one class room, holding them there all day, making them do online from that classroom is not in person instruction.
I hope TEA hammers them. Hopefully AISD parents will rise up and sue them.
Multiple in my area are accepting.culdeus said:Fenrir said:
I'd be curious to see if private school enrollments are increasing. I suspect the answer to that will not jive with the accusation that people only want a "free" babysitter.
What schools weren't at 100% with a wait-list as big as the enrollment already? Dallas had a massive boom from California and they swamped the schools with apps.
I'm not so sure about that. We as parents have been somewhat gleefully ignorant (willfully blind?) of what goes on in classrooms and at schools nowadays. The online learning in the spring gave parents a peak behind the curtain. Many parents were shocked to find out that there's no real learning done after STAAR testing. Its as if parents were amazed that the last two weeks of grade school was one big hangout session. Obviously it will look different starting this month and through the fall but virtual learning allows parents can see a modified version of what really goes on in a classroom setting and touch base with our kids in realtime during the day. For example, during any given day/class there's may be fair amount of 'down time' or 'free time' and I would not be surprised if some parents start to view this as as 'wasting time' or doing nothing.planoaggie123 said:
Well i am not going to say that many people's opinion on the quality of education is changing because of the pandemic.
tysker said:t the last two weeks of grade school was one big hangout session.planoaggie123 said:
Well i am not going to say that many people's opinion on the quality of education is changing because of the pandemic.
Precisely! I'm a retired principal, and I know my friends and former co-workers have been working and worrying all summer so they can create the best possible experience for their students regardless of the physical location. I can't think of any data or pedagogy that would lead educators to decide this was the best option available. In my opinion, it reeks of something that might be convenient for some adults, but it's certainly not what's best for kids.planoaggie123 said:
Agree that in such a situation 'at home' would be better than in class staring at a computer isolated....assuming families actually have capacity to accomdate...
Such a teaching method would prove that the ISD did nothing to plan or think through options but chose the laziest way out...