quote:
quote:Mr. Bigz is a chartist and its not hard to read resistance levels and support levels on charts. He didn't call $.09... he said it would be "ideal" for it to end there. He also said it could run today as well.
No surprise...stocks usually go up...or sometimes they go down. Saying it could run is just trying to get people to buy in too high. The fact that the chart said $.09 was about right for today still looks funny when you see all the "bid whackers" out there at "power hour" keeping it down. So all the people out there that think Bigz is a genius for getting it right are blind to the fact it was not a "free market" mover today. I said I thought there was manipulation... me and you agree on that.
quote:However with FTCH, this has stayed the same.
What has stayed the same? The fact that it was racing for $.20 on on Friday before some MMs supposedly holding back orders from executing on Thursday at $.175 and is now going to have problems breaking past $.125 again? Do you understand the fickle nature of stocks and the emotions behind them? When stocks stagnate because MMs play games, it causes some to sell. It's the nature of the beast... we aren't in a vacuum here. I'll contend it will break past .125 in the next couple days.
quote:No one said we KNOW ALL of the behind the door decisions, just some of the news releases to come. As an investor you don't want to leak PR news before a release because you can trigger sell offs if people don't think they are getting close to their perceived target goal.
Again, isn't that inside info? Why would they not just do a PR instead of waiting for each investor to call and ask what's going on and then have to explain to each of them? IR giving information about a PR that has already come out because someone didn't see it is one thing, but giving behind the scenes information is completely different.Because the timing of PRs are very important, especially with the nature of investors in penny stocks. Surely you won't argue with that?
quote:Just because a float is virtually locked up doesn't mean there is going to be residual selling every day.
Again, because 590k shares is "residual". Seeing that it was one seller, yes, residual. If it would have been a huge block of millions of shares from multiple sellers then it wouldn't have been residual.
quote:I guess I haven't seen any examples, so please provide them. I've seen some drive by bashing by posters that claim the stock is bloated, but that isn't true.
Do you understand what you just posted? Of course there are no examples of negativity because all the negative posts have been deleted. Don't tell me you haven't seen the numerous replies to a deleted message within the last week. I've seen them, but I don't know what was on them... did you see any examples before they were deleted?
quote:Their current financial statement will come out in early June according to the last video conference administered by Frank
Or in Craig Baker's case (and yours I am to assume) those statements basically came out last week, and now the rest of us just have to wait it out. No, I haven't seen current financials to be released, and I don't believe that Craig Baker guy has either.