Ag in Tiger Country said:
You claim I didn't read the article; how do you know? Truth is, I did indeed read the damn article, along with other articles; YOU actually bragged that you didn't read the Facebook article
Yes, because it was a literal facebook post from a literal random conspiracy theorist who was neither credentialed or qualified to speak on it. It would be the exact same thing if I sent you my crazy aunt's FB post regarding covid vaccine 'truth.' Facebook should NEVER be used as a source, I can't believe I'm telling a grown up this.
Quote:
I offered, but when I offered content from a Reuters article that also blamed Wong, you try to suggest that it doesn't state that Wong wasn't the one responsible for organizing those attendees of Waltz at his direction, which is incorrect. It's been established that Goldberg was an invitee from Waltz's group/list; now we know Wong was responsible for creating Waltz's invitee list, which included Goldberg.
Omg NO IT DIDNT. This is why I accused you of not reading the article because it did no such thing. The ONLY thing that Reuters article did was state that Waltz asked Wong to put together a 'tiger team' list. That was the totality of Wong's involvement per that article. You either didn't read it or you extrapolated the words on the screen to mean that Wong created the Signal group chat and/or invited Goldberg himself (NEITHER of which happened because WONG DIDNT HAVE ACCESS TO THE CHAT).
Quote:
Look, I agree using that App was a mistake; I agree the journalist being in the chat was a mistake. Those mistakes can be corrected, & I hope they are because it is indeed a screw-up & a bad look for those involved.
Thank you!
Quote:
HOWEVER, you're clearly being obstinate about the POSSIBILITY that the journalist's participation could have been intentional,
My guy, Waltz literally went on the Laura Ingraham show and said "I did it."
Goldberg literally posted a screenshot of the Signal chat with an image saying ""Michael Waltz added you to the group." You are the one being obstinate and fishing for answers in unfounded conspiracy theories. Like, instead of looking at the direct evidence, you'd rather say "well isn't it
POSSIBLE that the deputy staffers' wife executed a deliberate plot to leak war plans on an app chosen by the SecDef"? Listen to yourself.
The rest of your post is just a childish ad hominem.