Fdsa said:
Houston Lee said:
For all of you morons with your soy milk crying about this. I will let the response by the Sec of Defense speak for itself.
Quote:
So, let's me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called "war plans" and those "plans" include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information.
Those are some really ****ty war plans.
This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an "attack plan" (as he now calls it). Not even close.
As I type this, my team and I are traveling the INDOPACOM region, meeting w/ Commanders (the guys who make REAL "war plans") and talking to troops.
We will continue to do our job, while the media does what it does best: peddle hoaxes.
Ha…go update your classification guide real quick, Pete, to match what you just said.
I read the messages and I think Hegseth summed them up pretty accurately. If you really want to stretch you can say that an after the fact note that planes and missiles had flown was borderline but certainly didn't endanger anyone. If this was directly sent to the Houthis they don't know from where or what the targets are they just know they are being attacked which had already been announced publicly.
It's also evident that this was a chat that was lower security level because those details aren't included. Hegseth and others were clearly communicating elsewhere on the tactical plans and that's what would be classified.
Obviously this isn't something you would want a journalist included on and it's not a good look but it's been completely overblown. Anyone losing their mind over this is clearly partisan or simply hasn't looked at the details.
The fact that the press is actively trying to come up with any distraction to hurt Trump also can't be understated. Sorry but they have no credibility.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Ronald Reagan
