AgFormerlyInIrving said:
Incredibly sad story.
If liberals had shame, they should be ashamed of themselves for insisting on an environment that HEAVILY PROMOTES this very thing!!!
FIFY
AgFormerlyInIrving said:
Incredibly sad story.
If liberals had shame, they should be ashamed of themselves for insisting on an environment that HEAVILY PROMOTES this very thing!!!
88planoAg said:
This poor child. Trying to appease /please both parents who are using him as a pawn. There is no winning here, for that child or for his twin, his brother. They have been damaged by this and it will take a lifetime to heal.
No matter your opinion of the entire issue of transgender, I think we can all agree on the above.
That said...I have such a hard time with the idea that young children should be making these decisions and as a result be subjected to chemically altering their puberty. I do not believe this is right.
UGH. Being DC is hard enough on its own, but when you add a bat**** crazy social mom on top of everything I can't even imagine what a giant mess it becomes.TravelAg2004 said:
They used IVF and an egg donor.
TravelAg2004 said:
So what is the next step for the father here...legally. I get there are "other" options, but what can he do to try and keep this craziness from moving forward?
Yep, hopefully the appeals court goes better. This situation is hell on dad, and the kid (and will be worse if mom gets to take a knife to his manhood so she can have her little daughter and stick it to dad).BenFiasco14 said:
Appeal and then petition the Texas Supreme Court (assuming he loses). And, theoretically, even a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Saint Pablo said:
The website for her practice has a link to Google Reviews and Facebook Reviews, go show her some love. http://www.drannemd.com/
Pediatrician. So she is probably giving out advice on how to do this to many people.OkinTexas said:Saint Pablo said:
The website for her practice has a link to Google Reviews and Facebook Reviews, go show her some love. http://www.drannemd.com/
She's a damned Dr?
Quote:
why isn't this story getting more media attention?
Even that make no sense, my wife always wanted a daughter but she damn sure loves the hell out of her boys.AG 2000' said:
Haven't seen the jury makeup on this decision, guessing it was predominantly female.
Links would be real handy.Sweet Clementine said:
Just FYI, the sources that you are all reading on this are extremely biased towards the father. The father is a con man who is blasting these things on social media to make himself look good.
Do yourselves a favor and go find some actual information about this case before condemning and threatening the mother.
Sweet Clementine said:
Do you really think that the mom is forcing the child to do this? I know that's what you've read, but dad has done a great job of mobilizing the anti-trans movement to back him up.
He also has solicited many many donations and allegedly quit his job to live off of the money that he has received.
Not being okay with a crazy parent letting their seven year old child take hormone-altering drugs and/or chopping off his ***** DOES NOT equal "anti-trans movement"Sweet Clementine said:
Do you really think that the mom is forcing the child to do this? I know that's what you've read, but dad has done a great job of mobilizing the anti-trans movement to back him up.
He also has solicited many many donations and allegedly quit his job to live off of the money that he has received.
Sweet Clementine said:
https://www.quora.com/How-much-truth-is-there-in-the-Save-James-case
This seems to lay out some of the flaws in the dad's case.
The second entry is very informative. I'd copy paste but I'm on my phone and it's being difficult.
She gave birth.Faustus said:
Lots to this story I'm missing.
How did the non-biological mother get custody over the actual father?
I assume she adopted the child, but if the mom and dad separated when the child was 3, then that was the time to get her out of the picture by at least seeking to be the sole managing conservator over his biological children.
I'd be curious what the legal theories were at trial, and how they were presented. I'm having difficulty envisioning a jury siding with the mom based on the facts as presented here. Are there any articles that lay out the two sides' legal filings and arguments?