Can we please have an *****Official James Woods' Tweets***** thread
389,386 Views |
2047 Replies |
Last: 11 mo ago by BMX Bandit
That white dude with the glasses in the middle may be the scariest thing on the boat
Of all the places in the world, this is where you found Waldo.Quote:
That white dude with the glasses in the middle may be the scariest thing on the boat
Nothing is private or protected when it comes to conservatives on Twitter. There will be a backlash and that's why I don't mess with their stock. It will only get worse prior to the midterms and then even worse before 2020. I'm not computer literate enough, but there is a HUGE opportunity there to be had for a conservative Twitter.
I'd invest, but only if we call it "****ter"!
Damn, how about give me a T, and a W, and an A, and a T. Those were the letters.
Damn, how about give me a T, and a W, and an A, and a T. Those were the letters.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
This is backed by data.
You made it farther than I, as I couldn't even bring myself to clicking the link. I prefer to keep what little sanity I have left, and articles like that will surely take my level down to 0 before too long.MooreTrucker said:"I feel like there is no "me" outside of my white/upper middle class/cisgender identity. "Facebook Sucks said:Tom Hagen said:
Wow, that article. Talk about creating a problem where none exists. The OP of that story sounds like they would be fun at parties.
Stopped reading right there.
So hard and fast proportionate share rules, huh? So will black representation be capped at 12% in total and on all committees?
Will non traditional genders be capped at <1%?
Will non traditional genders be capped at <1%?
What percent do conservatives get?FrioAg 00 said:
So hard and fast proportionate share rules, huh? So will black representation be capped at 12% in total and on all committees?
Will non traditional genders be capped at <1%?
That's exactly the right question.
Once you start establishing quotas like these, where does it end? If something as definable as gender gets called into question - where else does it go?
I agree that the entire idea of socially engineering an outcome like the DNC has started here is wreckless and dangerous.
Once you start establishing quotas like these, where does it end? If something as definable as gender gets called into question - where else does it go?
I agree that the entire idea of socially engineering an outcome like the DNC has started here is wreckless and dangerous.
I don't understand.FrioAg 00 said:
So hard and fast proportionate share rules, huh? So will black representation be capped at 12% in total and on all committees?
Will non traditional genders be capped at <1%?
It's a violation of federal law to discriminate based on sex.
Unless you're male.
You can argue that 50/50 is proportionate so doesn't discriminate, but then you've just made a solid argument to cap racial representation and ensure a white majority as well
You can argue that 50/50 is proportionate so doesn't discriminate, but then you've just made a solid argument to cap racial representation and ensure a white majority as well
ProgN
Joined:
Jan 1, 2015
Posts:
35,744
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/2912732/nextAggiebrewer said:
What did Lanny do, not do? I don't tweet, facebook
Go to the next to last post on that thread.
Hold on
I'm shocked airports haven't pulled them yet. They are so controversial and off putting to any sane person regardless of viewpoints.
CNN actually pays to be shown in the airports.Agnzona said:
I'm shocked airports haven't pulled them yet. They are so controversial and off putting to any sane person regardless of viewpoints.
So how soon until they stop being included in the cable bundling? How soon until they go bankrupt?
They can't pay to be played in airports and hotels forever.
They can't pay to be played in airports and hotels forever.
If they quit paying for the airport viewership, they would lose another +100k in the rankings.Rapier108 said:CNN actually pays to be shown in the airports.Agnzona said:
I'm shocked airports haven't pulled them yet. They are so controversial and off putting to any sane person regardless of viewpoints.
Amazing. In and Out is the place to hang if you want to avoid the cancer that is liberalism.
Aggball2010
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
82
Angry Beaver
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
81
AeroAg2012
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
70
AggieBucksJB
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
59
therealnick05
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
53
Andrew13
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
53
Another Doug
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
46
Harry Stone
we just won 4 straight series against 4 ranked opponents.
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
46
missinAggieland
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
45
sealyag
Was the final pitcher in game 3 Using an illegal substance?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
44