Most of the teams listed have multiple quality receiving threats and are much deeper/better than what Dallas has. I think I would take every single one of those teams' first options over CD and certainly would take most of their second and third options over Gallup/Noah Brown/whomever else.texagbeliever said:What teams have good offenses without the investment in WR?duck79 said:
Gallup is a quality receiver but he shouldn't be the key to the entire offense opening up.
I look at what other teams have done on offense without spending huge money on multiple receivers and I just feel that Moore is the biggest issue. There just doesn't seem to be any adjustments to his players strengths. Dak is no Mahomes but I feel he is definitely in the 8-12 range and an OC should be able to work with that.
Vikings: Jefferson + Adam Thielen + KJ Osborn + Irv Smith Jr.
Miami: Hill + Waddle
Eagles: Brown + DeVonta Smith + Dallas Goedert
Raiders: Adams + Hunter Renfrow + Darren Waller
Bengals: Chase + Tee Higgins + Tyler Boyd
TB: Evans, Godwin & rejuvenated JJ
Bills: Diggs + Gabriel Davis + Jamison Crowder + Dawson Knox + Isaiah McKenzie
Colts: Pittman (and a dominant run game)
On the other side
Green Bay: (looked terrible without Adams)
KC: Mahomes is special (they still have JuJu, Travis Kelce, MVS, invested an early pick in Skyy Moore)
Dallas: Not good
Cardinals: Not good. (hopkins out and Ertz limping)