absolutely - i believe they were talking about how thankful they were that the Sheriff's office was shielding them from sight, and someone basically agreed because of the media coverage
****Kyle Rittenhouse Trial-VERDICT WATCH-Day 4****
102,829 Views |
1100 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Tailgate88
I doubt it. The jurors could see the media until the screens were up.Good Poster said:Did a juror just admit she has been following media coverage of the case? pic.twitter.com/5zIt5eeavw
— Jack Po-So-Bik (@JackPosobiec) November 19, 2021
BusterAg said:
That's a stretch.
I turned on the TV. Media. I had to turn it off.
Agreed. Or it could be that they were driving around and saw all the television vans.
So they are protecting the jurors arriving at the courthouse getting off the bus. Where do they meet to get on?
Try again
An undisclosed location that presumably has changed at least once.
It is possible, perhaps likely that the original drone footage is 4k. At that resolution it would be clear that Kyle was acting in self defense. If they brought in Beamen for foundation that would reveal the much higher quality source. Tucker plays the video in HD, so the "fairy" takes a screen recording from that to obfuscate that they didn't know a 4k copy exists. HD was still too clear so they create an even lower resolution to give the defense.
sounds like they could mean the media presence and following them around and suchpowerbelly said:I doubt it. The jurors could see the media until the screens were up.Good Poster said:Did a juror just admit she has been following media coverage of the case? pic.twitter.com/5zIt5eeavw
— Jack Po-So-Bik (@JackPosobiec) November 19, 2021
If she's a convicting Karen, I think she was watching news.
If she's an acquitting soccer mom, I think she was talking about the media around the courthouse.
If she's an acquitting soccer mom, I think she was talking about the media around the courthouse.
How is someone who is running away and getting knocked down, kicked in the head, hit my a skateboard and has a gun drawn on him EVER not self defense? Whether he should have been there or not is not the question.
He could be the leader of the KKK for all I care and still has the right to defend himself and be there.
He could be the leader of the KKK for all I care and still has the right to defend himself and be there.
Some are at home on the internet and TV, they are seeing everything.TexasAggie_02 said:sounds like they could mean the media presence and following them around and suchpowerbelly said:I doubt it. The jurors could see the media until the screens were up.Good Poster said:Did a juror just admit she has been following media coverage of the case? pic.twitter.com/5zIt5eeavw
— Jack Po-So-Bik (@JackPosobiec) November 19, 2021
Rekieta's talking about this hot take article. What garbage:
https://archive.md/fE2QY
https://archive.md/fE2QY
Quote:
Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Was Strong. It's Also a Threat to the Rule of Law.
Quote:
In August 2020, Kyle Rittenhouse illegally brought an AR-15 rifle to Kenosha, Wisconsin, in the name of law and order. As protests and riots raged in the wake of the police shooting of Jacob Blake, the 17-year-old Blue Lives Matter enthusiast felt called to serve as an amateur armed guard for a Kenosha car dealership. He ended up shooting two unarmed protesters dead and blowing off another's right bicep.
Now, a Wisconsin jury is deliberating over whether Rittenhouse's shooting spree constituted a crime. And many legal observers believe it did not, or at least that the prosecution did not prove the teenage vigilante guilty of the most serious charges brought against him. Thus, an acquittal would not necessarily discredit the jurors' judgement. But it would spotlight the anarchy latent in America's peculiar combination of lax gun regulations, expansive self-defense rights, and mass gun ownership.
I can only surmise this is the point they are getting hung up on. I agree, wrongfully so.Muy said:
Whether he should have been there or not is not the question.
That's the point. There were thousands of people who "shouldn't have been there," and every one of them had the right to defend themselves if attacked.Muy said:
How is someone who is running away and getting knocked down, kicked in the head, hit my a skateboard and has a gun drawn on him EVER not self defense? Whether he should have been there or not is not the question.
He could be the leader of the KKK for all I care and still has the right to defend himself and be there.
Waffledynamics said:
Rekieta's talking about this hot take article. What garbage:
https://archive.md/fE2QYQuote:
Kyle Rittenhouse's Defense Was Strong. It's Also a Threat to the Rule of Law.Quote:
In August 2020, Kyle Rittenhouse illegally brought an AR-15 rifle to Kenosha, Wisconsin, in the name of law and order. As protests and riots raged in the wake of the police shooting of Jacob Blake, the 17-year-old Blue Lives Matter enthusiast felt called to serve as an amateur armed guard for a Kenosha car dealership. He ended up shooting two unarmed protesters dead and blowing off another's right bicep.
Now, a Wisconsin jury is deliberating over whether Rittenhouse's shooting spree constituted a crime. And many legal observers believe it did not, or at least that the prosecution did not prove the teenage vigilante guilty of the most serious charges brought against him. Thus, an acquittal would not necessarily discredit the jurors' judgement. But it would spotlight the anarchy latent in America's peculiar combination of lax gun regulations, expansive self-defense rights, and mass gun ownership.
These are the looneys we're up against. Holy *****
That's a different optic than the one that Kyle was using during the riots.
Different gun?
Different gun?
If you wandered into a gang controlled area and "shouldn't have been there" according to some thought, does that mean your murder is justified? Or, shouldn't you still have the right to life? Same thought just in reverse.
If the jury is hung up on this for this long, he may be in trouble
If the jury is hung up on this for this long, he may be in trouble
Catag94 said:
If you wandered into a gang controlled area and "shouldn't have been there" according to some thought, does that mean your murder is justified? Or, shouldn't you still have the right to life? Same thought just in reverse.
If the jury is hung up on this for this long, he may be in trouble
I think it's one, maybe a couple, of the jurors trying to virtue signal or are worried about the mob that are holding up an acquittal. But, maybe I'm an optimist.
Yeah. Different time altogether. It's meant as a joke, not as anything related to the incident.BusterAg said:
That's a different optic than the one that Kyle was using during the riots.
Different gun?
NukeAg10 said:Catag94 said:
If you wandered into a gang controlled area and "shouldn't have been there" according to some thought, does that mean your murder is justified? Or, shouldn't you still have the right to life? Same thought just in reverse.
If the jury is hung up on this for this long, he may be in trouble
I think it's one, maybe a couple, of the jurors trying to virtue signal or are worried about the mob that are holding up an acquittal. But, maybe I'm an optimist.
I feel the same way as well. I know there was a discussion about the defense lawyer saying he felt it was 6-6, but to me that seems more like a canned response: something he would just fall back on.
Player To Be Named Later
Joined:
Sep 22, 2003
Posts:
22,920
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, guarantee you if roles were reversed, and Byecep Man had shot Kyle after Kyle pointed his rifle at him, this liberal DA would have declined to prosecute him due to it being obvious self defense.Muy said:
How is someone who is running away and getting knocked down, kicked in the head, hit my a skateboard and has a gun drawn on him EVER not self defense? Whether he should have been there or not is not the question.
He could be the leader of the KKK for all I care and still has the right to defend himself and be there.
Is it possible the judge had already decided this is a trash trial and he is intentionally providing avenues for mistrial with prejudice ?
A tip just came in that the verdict is in and will be released in an hour.
Report verdict is in.
Verdict in the next hour
Verdict may be in. Heard it on rekieta - from a random New York reporter
Rekieta's stream just said someone from the NY Post (I think) said the verdict is expected within an hour.
kingj3 said:
Verdict may be in. Heard it on rekieta - from a random New York reporter
NY Post I think
Got a reliable tip that the Rittenhouse verdict is in and will be announced in the next hour.
— Karol Markowicz (@karol) November 19, 2021
Here we go!!!!
When the charter buses of protesters roll into the town, then the verdict is coming
Someone talk me off the ledge....
EDHEC Ag said:
It is possible, perhaps likely that the original drone footage is 4k. At that resolution it would be clear that Kyle was acting in self defense. If they brought in Beamen for foundation that would reveal the much higher quality source. Tucker plays the video in HD, so the "fairy" takes a screen recording from that to obfuscate that they didn't know a 4k copy exists. HD was still too clear so they create an even lower resolution to give the defense.
The resolution they used (both HD and the lower res) is not a native resolution to any of the popular drone platforms. It was definitely cropped, which we also know because they cropped out one of the Antifa guys shooting his gun in the air first before Kyle shot.
Show some backbone. Acquit is the only answer
Featured Stories
See All
62:04
12h ago
11k
19:16
1d ago
20k
Learned, Loved, Loathed: Texas A&M 33, Florida 20
by Olin Buchanan