George Floyd case-latest developments

126,015 Views | 1866 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Bondag
GarryowenAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who's Ms. Anderson?
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You keep bringing up MMA, then get mad that people call out why your MMA comparision is so bad.

aggiehawg again answered. see here post above.

you can also read this.

http://dhss.alaska.gov/ocs/Documents/childrensjustice/strangulation/16.%20Forensic%20Medical%20Findings%20in%20Fatal%20and%20Non-Fatal%20Intimate%20Partner%20Strangulation%20Assaults%20-%20Hawley%20-%202012.pdf

you can have the last word. you were destroyed on this months ago and haven't improved your arguments
AgResearch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

AgResearch said:

2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Do you believe that choking causes enough bodily damage to be cause of death in an autopsy?
Of course it can. But there was no physical evidence that Floyd was choked to death.
That's cause choking to death wasn't the manner of death, homicide was.

Drug overdose and/or drug related heart failure is not homicide.
Again, Floyd did not die due to drug overdose and/or drug related heart failure. That was not the cause of his death.


Being restrained did not cause his death. MN is going to burn when this officer is rightly acquitted.
Kool
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieHawg:
Following this only peripherally now. Arguing with people over the interwebs just doesn't add to my life in any meaningful way, if you know what I mean. If you know, who has each side listed as a potential witness in terms of medical expertise at this point, or has that list been finalized as of yet?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

I think Cahill is walking a very fine line on excluding the May 2019 arrest and OD by Floyd. I also think the prosecution will easily open that door anyway with drug addiction testimony. Using his buddies and family members who did drugs with him, opens the door, in my view.


Yeah. I cannot wait for them to contradict and perjure themselves when called as witnesses.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

You keep bringing up MMA, then get mad that people call out why your MMA comparision is so bad.

aggiehawg again answered. see here post above. you can have the last word. you were destroyed on this months ago and haven't improved your arguments


What's so bad about pointing out that professional athletes frequently get choked unconscious with more deadly force than Floyd, and have no physical signs of being choked after, other than the video?

Please destroy that logic?

You can't. That's why you don't.

Lol at "other people" calling out this logic. Another failed attempt to strengthen your argument by associating others, because you are unable to "destroy" my undeniable common sense point.

Golden opportunity here.....tell me why the humans in my example get choked with more deadly force than Floyd and have no physical evidence afterwards of being choked unconscious? Are you claiming these athletes wouldn't have died if the choke had been held for minutes after they went unconscious?


2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

The ME's 302 even stated that Floyd's physical exertions before the neck restraint was even applied were more instrumental in causing the cardiopulmonary arrest given Floyd's preexisting medical conditions (75% blocked artery for one thing) and level of intoxication from his voluntary ingestion of illegal drugs.
Mind pointing this out? I don't think he specifically identified the physical exertion as the source for his cardiopulmonary arrest, but as part of the conditions building towards it.
Sure. My OP in starting this thread discusses the 302 and the prosecution's tardiness in divulging it to the defense.
Thanks, but he notes later in the 302 that the exertion contributed to a bad outcome. I didn't think he specifically identified that the physical exertion and restraint event prior to being on the ground as the cardiac event moment.
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lol, you edited your post to take.your ball and go home...."you can have last word" haha

Please tell us why Floyd would certainly have physical evidence of choking, but professional athletes choked unconscious with more force don't have any signs?

Your link and all your other posts don't address that simple question....so I guess it's better you avoid it.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
etxag02 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Do you believe that choking causes enough bodily damage to be cause of death in an autopsy?
Of course it can. But there was no physical evidence that Floyd was choked to death.


That's not true.

The Hennepin Co and family-ordered autopsies ruled homicide as the cause of death due to his restraint. The Hennepin Co report did list drug use as being a factor that could have contributed to the death of George Floyd. But it reported that neck compression and cardiopulmonary arrest played a larger role in his death.
Laypeople often conflate cause of death with manner of death. And that becomes misleading.

Floyd's cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest. That's the medical term.

The manner of death is an opinion of the origin of the cause of death. ME stated that under any other circumstance, judging from his drug level and poor health he would say Floyd died of a fentanyl and other drug overdose. In terms of the manner of death, the ME's opinion comes down to the but/for question.

Here that boils down to but for Chauvin's knee restraint, would Floyd be alive? The ME could not say that. That's a problem for the prosecution.
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

etxag02 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Do you believe that choking causes enough bodily damage to be cause of death in an autopsy?
Of course it can. But there was no physical evidence that Floyd was choked to death.


That's not true.

The Hennepin Co and family-ordered autopsies ruled homicide as the cause of death due to his restraint. The Hennepin Co report did list drug use as being a factor that could have contributed to the death of George Floyd. But it reported that neck compression and cardiopulmonary arrest played a larger role in his death.
Laypeople often conflate cause of death with manner of death. And that becomes misleading.

Floyd's cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest. That's the medical term.

The manner of death is an opinion of the origin of the cause of death. ME stated that under any other circumstance, judging from his drug level and poor health he would say Floyd died of a fentanyl and other drug overdose. In terms of the manner of death, the ME's opinion comes down to the but/for question.

Here that boils down to but for Chauvin's knee restraint, would Floyd be alive? The ME could not say that. That's a problem for the prosecution.
They also conflate 'choking' with 'strangling.'
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgResearch said:

2PacShakur said:

AgResearch said:

2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Do you believe that choking causes enough bodily damage to be cause of death in an autopsy?
Of course it can. But there was no physical evidence that Floyd was choked to death.
That's cause choking to death wasn't the manner of death, homicide was.

Drug overdose and/or drug related heart failure is not homicide.
Again, Floyd did not die due to drug overdose and/or drug related heart failure. That was not the cause of his death.


Being restrained did not cause his death. MN is going to burn when this officer is rightly acquitted.
I have helicopters flying over my house every night the last few, but do try to help by keeping Texans away from Minnesota.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can we keep this thread to what is actually going on in court please?
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Can we keep this thread to what is actually going on in court please?
Pretty sure Juror #20 will be on the jury, judging from his answers thus far.
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Can we keep this thread to what is actually going on in court please?
Can you just start another thread, label it George Floyd Trial Discussion Only.

maybe the mods will help keep a thread like that clean
rwpag71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's like the covid-19 question. Did George Floyd die because of Chauvin's knee on his neck or with Chauvin's knee on his neck? Right now I don't see proof beyond a reasonable doubt for either scenario, but it's only the former that has to be proved.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BQ_90 said:

aginlakeway said:

Can we keep this thread to what is actually going on in court please?
Can you just start another thread, label it George Floyd Trial Discussion Only.

maybe the mods will help keep a thread like that clean

Is that what is desired? Hawg?
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
etxag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

etxag02 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Do you believe that choking causes enough bodily damage to be cause of death in an autopsy?
Of course it can. But there was no physical evidence that Floyd was choked to death.


That's not true.

The Hennepin Co and family-ordered autopsies ruled homicide as the cause of death due to his restraint. The Hennepin Co report did list drug use as being a factor that could have contributed to the death of George Floyd. But it reported that neck compression and cardiopulmonary arrest played a larger role in his death.
Laypeople often conflate cause of death with manner of death. And that becomes misleading.

Floyd's cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest. That's the medical term.

The manner of death is an opinion of the origin of the cause of death. ME stated that under any other circumstance, judging from his drug level and poor health he would say Floyd died of a fentanyl and other drug overdose. In terms of the manner of death, the ME's opinion comes down to the but/for question.

Here that boils down to but for Chauvin's knee restraint, would Floyd be alive? The ME could not say that. That's a problem for the prosecution.


Patently false statement. ME ruled it a homicide and said Floyd's heart and lungs stopped functioning "while being restrained" by law enforcement officers.
the enigma
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have only read the last few pages of this post, and really don't have a dog in this fight but one reason why the comparison is bad is time. Professional fighters/UFC/MMA guys are choked for maybe 30secs max continuously, not 8 minutes like in the video. The signs of choking take time to develop. Another reason is that not one fighter has had an autopsy after losing a fight to a choke so you don't know if there are minute signs in the soft tissues or not. Autopsies typically are not done on live people so (although unlikely) there could be contusions or other soft tissue injuries that go unnoticed after a fight. Would the fighter die if the choke was applied continuously for 8 minutes, sure, but you would have signs develop in that time, like petechiae that was mentioned earlier

(Substitute strangling for choking if you want, message stays the same)
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

BQ_90 said:

aginlakeway said:

Can we keep this thread to what is actually going on in court please?
Can you just start another thread, label it George Floyd Trial Discussion Only.

maybe the mods will help keep a thread like that clean

Is that what is desired? Hawg?

Doesn't matter to me. But I do think the mods dislike multiple threads on the same subject. In my mind, when the actual trial begins on March 29th, a new thread should be started, though.

The official Chauvin trial thread with the stars and all.
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2PacShakur said:

AgResearch said:

2PacShakur said:

AgResearch said:

2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Do you believe that choking causes enough bodily damage to be cause of death in an autopsy?
Of course it can. But there was no physical evidence that Floyd was choked to death.
That's cause choking to death wasn't the manner of death, homicide was.

Drug overdose and/or drug related heart failure is not homicide.
Again, Floyd did not die due to drug overdose and/or drug related heart failure. That was not the cause of his death.


Being restrained did not cause his death. MN is going to burn when this officer is rightly acquitted.
I have helicopters flying over my house every night the last few, but do try to help by keeping Texans away from Minnesota.


They are Boogaloos, intent on starting a race war, shifting sides and even showing up as "security" for radical leftists when it forwards their anarchist agenda.
“If you’re going to have crime it should at least be organized crime”
-Havelock Vetinari
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

etxag02 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Do you believe that choking causes enough bodily damage to be cause of death in an autopsy?
Of course it can. But there was no physical evidence that Floyd was choked to death.


That's not true.

The Hennepin Co and family-ordered autopsies ruled homicide as the cause of death due to his restraint. The Hennepin Co report did list drug use as being a factor that could have contributed to the death of George Floyd. But it reported that neck compression and cardiopulmonary arrest played a larger role in his death.
Laypeople often conflate cause of death with manner of death. And that becomes misleading.

Floyd's cause of death was cardiopulmonary arrest. That's the medical term.

The manner of death is an opinion of the origin of the cause of death. ME stated that under any other circumstance, judging from his drug level and poor health he would say Floyd died of a fentanyl and other drug overdose. In terms of the manner of death, the ME's opinion comes down to the but/for question.

Here that boils down to but for Chauvin's knee restraint, would Floyd be alive? The ME could not say that. That's a problem for the prosecution.
The ME said he couldn't answer the but/for question because he couldn't say what combination of stress and physical exertion would result in a cardiac event for Floyd. He was healthy enough to play basketball regularly and helped move some furniture so he wasn't going to "pop".
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the enigma said:

I have only read the last few pages of this post, and really don't have a dog in this fight but one reason why the comparison is bad is time. Professional fighters/UFC/MMA guys are choked for maybe 30secs max continuously, not 8 minutes like in the video. The signs of choking take time to develop. Another reason is that not one fighter has had an autopsy after losing a fight to a choke so you don't know if there are minute signs in the soft tissues or not. Autopsies typically are not done on live people so (although unlikely) there could be contusions or other soft tissue injuries that go unnoticed after a fight. Would the fighter die if the choke was applied continuously for 8 minutes, sure, but you would have signs develop in that time, like petechiae that was mentioned earlier


Right, but if that fighter had COVID and drugs in his system, it would be likely that the fighter OD'd precisely when he wasn't choked to death.

If any choked to death human showed up to an autopsy and the examiner didn't use a video of choking, would the examiner site drug toxicity or "tiny spots under skin due to minor trauma" (aka petechiae)?

It's a good question and central to this case....not something that should be marginalized.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

aginlakeway said:

BQ_90 said:

aginlakeway said:

Can we keep this thread to what is actually going on in court please?
Can you just start another thread, label it George Floyd Trial Discussion Only.

maybe the mods will help keep a thread like that clean

Is that what is desired? Hawg?

Doesn't matter to me. But I do think the mods dislike multiple threads on the same subject. In my mind, when the actual trial begins on March 29th, a new thread should be started, though.

The official Chauvin trial thread with the stars and all.


Sounds like a good idea.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Patently false statement. ME ruled it a homicide and said Floyd's heart and lungs stopped functioning "while being restrained" by law enforcement officers.
"Prior" to being on the ground. That's the distinction. Exertions by Floyd that he engaged in, prior to being on the ground.

Chauvin never touched Floyd before he was on the ground or going down to the ground from the squad car's rear seat.

So my statement is not patently false within the context of the charges against Derek Chauvin. Those charges are what is under discussion and whether the evidence supports each element of the offenses charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

That's why the but/for question is critical for determining manner of death in a criminal trial.

Were this a wrongful death civil case, your point might have more relevance.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

He was healthy enough to play basketball regularly and helped move some furniture so he wasn't going to "pop".
Assuming facts not in evidence. Can you say he had three times the lethal dose of fentanyl and meth in his system during such exertions? No you cannot. Therefore, irrelevant to this case.
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Patently false statement. ME ruled it a homicide and said Floyd's heart and lungs stopped functioning "while being restrained" by law enforcement officers.
"Prior" to being on the ground. That's the distinction. Exertions by Floyd that he engaged in, prior to being on the ground.

Chauvin never touched Floyd before he was on the ground or going down to the ground from the squad car's rear seat.

So my statement is not patently false within the context of the charges against Derek Chauvin. Those charges are what is under discussion and whether the evidence supports each element of the offenses charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

That's why the but/for question is critical for determining manner of death in a criminal trial.

Were this a wrongful death civil case, your point might have more relevance.
Again, he said that those actions contributed to an unfortunate outcome, he didn't specifically state that the moment the cardiac event occurred. He couldn't identify a specific moment Floyd became critical.
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

He was healthy enough to play basketball regularly and helped move some furniture so he wasn't going to "pop".
Assuming facts not in evidence. Can you say he had three times the lethal dose of fentanyl and meth in his system during such exertions? No you cannot. Therefore, irrelevant to this case.
So, he's both a habitual user and also couldn't tolerate the drug he was abusing?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Patently false statement. ME ruled it a homicide and said Floyd's heart and lungs stopped functioning "while being restrained" by law enforcement officers.
"Prior" to being on the ground. That's the distinction. Exertions by Floyd that he engaged in, prior to being on the ground.

Chauvin never touched Floyd before he was on the ground or going down to the ground from the squad car's rear seat.

So my statement is not patently false within the context of the charges against Derek Chauvin. Those charges are what is under discussion and whether the evidence supports each element of the offenses charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

That's why the but/for question is critical for determining manner of death in a criminal trial.

Were this a wrongful death civil case, your point might have more relevance.
Again, he said that those actions contributed to an unfortunate outcome, he didn't specifically state that the moment the cardiac event occurred. He couldn't identify a specific moment Floyd became critical.

Sounds like the opposite of "beyond a reasonable doubt" ...
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

He was healthy enough to play basketball regularly and helped move some furniture so he wasn't going to "pop".
Assuming facts not in evidence. Can you say he had three times the lethal dose of fentanyl and meth in his system during such exertions? No you cannot. Therefore, irrelevant to this case.
So, he's both a habitual user and also couldn't tolerate the drug he was abusing?
Another rabbit hole that is irrelevant, at this time, that is. It might become a subject depending on how the prosecution chooses to proceed. It would be unwise for them to do so IMO but bringing the charges that they have against Chauvin and the other officers was also unwise.

I have learned over the years not to underestimate the stupidity of prosecuting attorneys since it is often an elected office. Politics and optics play more of a role than they should in a court of law. Again my opinion.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
this thread would be a lot better if a certain window licker could understand his own argument.
2PacShakur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From Washington Post (E: forgot link):
Quote:

"I'm skeptical of the notion of opioid overdose as the cause here," said David Juurlink, head of the Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center in Toronto. "The sequence of events isn't characteristic of opioid overdose."

Fentanyl kills by shutting down the part of the brain that controls respiration. Breathing slows, then stops, followed by the heart.

If Floyd had ingested an opioid and fell asleep on his way toward an overdose death, several experts told The Post, he wouldn't, or couldn't, have spent the next 20 minutes coherently interacting with police, repeatedly describing his claustrophobia and anxiety, battling with them as they tried to put him in a squad car and struggling against the three officers who pinned him facedown on the street. Instead, he would have become even more sluggish on the path toward unconsciousness and death, these experts said.

"It's just complete garbage to call it an overdose," said Kimberly Sue, medical director of the Harm Reduction Coalition and a Yale School of Medicine instructor. In an opioid overdose, "a person is basically blue, unresponsive. It happens usually from the moment people use to 10 minutes."

...

Barnes said fentanyl could, theoretically, lower Floyd's blood pressure to the point that oxygenated blood was no longer able to flow through the clogged arteries to his heart. But the sequence of events again makes that much less likely than cardiac arrest as a result of the pressure on his neck and back, he said.

Floyd, Barnes noted, was walking and talking, then struggling with the officers, before he was pinned to the ground.

"I always ask: Why did it happen at that moment?" Barnes said. "Why didn't his breathing stop two minutes earlier?"
Post removed:
by user
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2PacShakur said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

He was healthy enough to play basketball regularly and helped move some furniture so he wasn't going to "pop".
Assuming facts not in evidence. Can you say he had three times the lethal dose of fentanyl and meth in his system during such exertions? No you cannot. Therefore, irrelevant to this case.
So, he's both a habitual user and also couldn't tolerate the drug he was abusing?
Aren't you the "pre-game expert" here? You pre-game for a night out but you also pre-game for a pick up basketball game or helping a relative move furniture? Not sure what level of prep is required and how consistent that dosage ends up being.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Aren't you the "pre-game expert" here? You pre-game for a night out but you also pre-game for a pick up basketball game or helping a relative move furniture? Not sure what level of prep is required and how consistent that dosage ends up being.
Ouch! That'll leave a mark.

Nicely played.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.