You aren't alone in that thought. He's too big a character in this series for his death to happen off screen.
I think the four parachutes they saw were Buck and his crew.Ghost of Bisbee said:
The missions in this series are so very well done. Loved watching that mini-dogfight when the bomber took down those German planes. The slow-mo scene was awesome.
looks like next episode we see one of the parachuters perspectives of coming across a concentration camp? I'm not ready for that if so
also, am I the only one who doesn't think Buck is dead?
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
That was another great episode. They have done an excellent job of portraying the brutality of this facet of the war (I expected nothing less, given BoB and The Pacific).
The main title musical theme in this series is really starting to grow on me., although I do find it odd how they choose to place the main titles with a long pre-title sequence. That's a minor gripe.
Unemployed said:I think the four parachutes they saw were Buck and his crew.Ghost of Bisbee said:
The missions in this series are so very well done. Loved watching that mini-dogfight when the bomber took down those German planes. The slow-mo scene was awesome.
looks like next episode we see one of the parachuters perspectives of coming across a concentration camp? I'm not ready for that if so
also, am I the only one who doesn't think Buck is dead?
I went to UNT at Randolph. We still did celestial. It was also required for a check ride in the E-3 and we were required to shoot cel any time we crossed the Atlantic or Pacific. It was not by the time I got to RC-135s.Hey Nav said:Trying not to derail the thread, folks, but I find this topic to be of much interest. I knew at least one B-17 Navigator - who has since passed on into the Wild Blue Yonder, and hopefully is labeled a "select lead" and "tailwind" Nav.Quote:
Dead reckoning. They still taught it when I went through nav school in 1996. I hated the nav log and the dreaded 6 minute DR, alter heading.
I'm a Class of '80, so I went through UNT at Mather. I reckon you went elsewhere - and they had quit teaching celestial by then.
When you're on a plane headed 10 hours into nothing but blue Pacific waters, and in the days before INS or GPS - just DR and a sextant, the rest of the crew treated you like a Golden God, at least until they got close to a NavAid that locked on :-)
Am not familiar with your "the dreaded 6 minute DR , alter heading" comment.
To BBRex - cel is not very practical over land on a short route into Germany. It's pretty much impossible for a wingman. You need a very level aircraft with no heading or airspeed changes for accurate readings. In daytime, you'd only get one line of position from the Sun, and if you were lucky, another line from the Moon, hopefully at a much different angle than the Sun.
While not a pilot, I learned Cel Nav as a mariner. We did six-minute dead reckonings because it's 1/10 an hour. You take a DR every 6 minutes and math at least three DRs to a fixed position along the same route. You then make the best guess as to what point the turn is at based on speed and course.AgNav93 said:I went to UNT at Randolph. We still did celestial. It was also required for a check ride in the E-3 and we were required to shoot cel any time we crossed the Atlantic or Pacific. It was not by the time I got to RC-135s.Hey Nav said:Trying not to derail the thread, folks, but I find this topic to be of much interest. I knew at least one B-17 Navigator - who has since passed on into the Wild Blue Yonder, and hopefully is labeled a "select lead" and "tailwind" Nav.Quote:
Dead reckoning. They still taught it when I went through nav school in 1996. I hated the nav log and the dreaded 6 minute DR, alter heading.
I'm a Class of '80, so I went through UNT at Mather. I reckon you went elsewhere - and they had quit teaching celestial by then.
When you're on a plane headed 10 hours into nothing but blue Pacific waters, and in the days before INS or GPS - just DR and a sextant, the rest of the crew treated you like a Golden God, at least until they got close to a NavAid that locked on :-)
Am not familiar with your "the dreaded 6 minute DR , alter heading" comment.
To BBRex - cel is not very practical over land on a short route into Germany. It's pretty much impossible for a wingman. You need a very level aircraft with no heading or airspeed changes for accurate readings. In daytime, you'd only get one line of position from the Sun, and if you were lucky, another line from the Moon, hopefully at a much different angle than the Sun.
I believe the WWII Museum in NO also provides research assistance. The National Naval Aviation Museum on Pensacola NAS is a good resource for Navy/Marines/CG.TH36 said:JABQ04 said:
Sign up for the free trial of fold 3 then cancel it before your week is done. Great site.
Thanks! Found some info on there!
Exactly. The main characters are real people. Pretty easy to ascertain what happened to them.ArmyAg2002 said:Unemployed said:I think the four parachutes they saw were Buck and his crew.Ghost of Bisbee said:
The missions in this series are so very well done. Loved watching that mini-dogfight when the bomber took down those German planes. The slow-mo scene was awesome.
looks like next episode we see one of the parachuters perspectives of coming across a concentration camp? I'm not ready for that if so
also, am I the only one who doesn't think Buck is dead?
Buck survives the war.
The 6 minute rule: At a ground speed of 400 Knots you will travel 40nms in 6 minutes. You would throw your DR out 40 nms along your current averaged heading or Track. From that DR you would measure a new heading (Alter Heading) back to centerline (flight planned course). At the DR time you call the new heading back to the pilot. You also have to compute a time back to centerline, throw a DR for that time and call it the pilot when returned to centerline. Oh, and don't forget to "kill the drift."BassCowboy33 said:While not a pilot, I learned Cel Nav as a mariner. We did six-minute dead reckonings because it's 1/10 an hour. You take a DR every 6 minutes and math at least three DRs to a fixed position along the same route. You then make the best guess as to what point the turn is at based on speed and course.AgNav93 said:I went to UNT at Randolph. We still did celestial. It was also required for a check ride in the E-3 and we were required to shoot cel any time we crossed the Atlantic or Pacific. It was not by the time I got to RC-135s.Hey Nav said:Trying not to derail the thread, folks, but I find this topic to be of much interest. I knew at least one B-17 Navigator - who has since passed on into the Wild Blue Yonder, and hopefully is labeled a "select lead" and "tailwind" Nav.Quote:
Dead reckoning. They still taught it when I went through nav school in 1996. I hated the nav log and the dreaded 6 minute DR, alter heading.
I'm a Class of '80, so I went through UNT at Mather. I reckon you went elsewhere - and they had quit teaching celestial by then.
When you're on a plane headed 10 hours into nothing but blue Pacific waters, and in the days before INS or GPS - just DR and a sextant, the rest of the crew treated you like a Golden God, at least until they got close to a NavAid that locked on :-)
Am not familiar with your "the dreaded 6 minute DR , alter heading" comment.
To BBRex - cel is not very practical over land on a short route into Germany. It's pretty much impossible for a wingman. You need a very level aircraft with no heading or airspeed changes for accurate readings. In daytime, you'd only get one line of position from the Sun, and if you were lucky, another line from the Moon, hopefully at a much different angle than the Sun.
Not sure if it's the same in the air, I imagine there are some differences. The margin for error on boats is usually much larger, because we're dealing with a slower speed.
Yep. I don't think anyone outside of command staff is left from the original group on the show.malenurse said:
They just about have to considering the losses
I thought about that as well but then wondered if they weren't trying to give the viewers the perspective of the men who flew the missions. They come home and their best friend is gone and they have no clue what happened to them.KCup17 said:
You aren't alone in that thought. He's too big a character in this series for his death to happen off screen.
I still stand behind that they will show some of what life as a POW was like. There were so many flyers that spent so much time in POW camps they likely won't just ignore it. They are already showing what downed flyers had to do to try to escape capture. Anyway, I'm not putting it as spoiler as it isn't known but just conjecture.agracer said:I thought about that as well but then wondered if they weren't trying to give the viewers the perspective of the men who flew the missions. They come home and their best friend is gone and they have no clue what happened to them.KCup17 said:
You aren't alone in that thought. He's too big a character in this series for his death to happen off screen.
Yeah, the guy climbing the flag pole with a US flag is definitely in a camp.AgLA06 said:
The previews showed what looked like scenes from the stalags.
jwoodmd said:I still stand behind that they will show some of what life as a POW was like. There were so many flyers that spent so much time in POW camps they likely won't just ignore it. They are already showing what downed flyers had to do to try to escape capture. Anyway, I'm not putting it as spoiler as it isn't known but just conjecture.agracer said:I thought about that as well but then wondered if they weren't trying to give the viewers the perspective of the men who flew the missions. They come home and their best friend is gone and they have no clue what happened to them.KCup17 said:
You aren't alone in that thought. He's too big a character in this series for his death to happen off screen.
Remember reading or hearing an interview with a WW2 bomber crew who spent time in POW camp in Germany.Gigem314 said:
The POW experiences were a significant part of the book, so I wouldn't be surprised to see them go into detail. That could be the "Bastogne" of this series.
You think the POWs were getting sausage and schnitzel?!MAROON said:
life without sausage or schnitzel (chicken fried steak)!
Lord take me now!
The dead man in Yossarian's tentagracer said:I thought about that as well but then wondered if they weren't trying to give the viewers the perspective of the men who flew the missions. They come home and their best friend is gone and they have no clue what happened to them.KCup17 said:
You aren't alone in that thought. He's too big a character in this series for his death to happen off screen.
Quote:
She of course had no idea, but she never served it, or any German food again.
agracer said:Remember reading or hearing an interview with a WW2 bomber crew who spent time in POW camp in Germany.Gigem314 said:
The POW experiences were a significant part of the book, so I wouldn't be surprised to see them go into detail. That could be the "Bastogne" of this series.
He said when he got home, the hardest thing to get used to was the availability of food b/c they only got fed a few times a day, it wasn't good and they were always hungry. He followed that up with a story of the first time his wife served boiled cabbage and he just about lost his mind and broke down in tears. Cabbage was part of or all they got just about every meal while he was a POW and he couldn't stand the taste let alone the smell of cabbage.
She of course had no idea, but she never served it, or any German food again.
aTmAg said:
For the critics (mostly in media) that criticized Cleven's off screen "death", kindly GFY. This worked great.