Solo Tetherball Champ said:
What I have said is that Jackson made some poor and even stupid narrative choices in the adaption and my attitude towards these ranges from eh to irritation, but never reaches nerdrage. I also think he tends to favor set pieces and the rule of cool over actual intimacy moments.
This a pretty fair take in my opinion, coming from somebody that falls more towards the "loving the movies" side of things but also gets annoyed with a lot of the problems in them every time I read the books.
I do think The Hobbit trilogy proves that Jackson is not infallible as a director (yes, I know there were all kinds of production issues in the background on it, but still) and I do think it's fair to wonder what somebody could do with the trilogy now, and if it might even be better than the current adaptations (Which again, I'm a big fan of).
I know someone above mentioned Tolkien would appreciate a version of his story that was told a little differently, but I feel pretty confident in saying he would not. And that's not because the movies are bad, that's just how he was.
As a quick aside, did anyone play the Fellowship of the Ring video game? On the original Xbox? I've been thinking about it a lot lately since I started listening to the audiobook. The other two games in the series were more fighting style games, with co-op modes that focused on Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli and followed the movies pretty closely. But the Fellowship was made by a different studio I think, and so it instead (mostly) followed the book and had no relation to the movie. It included things like Bombadil, Barrow Wights, and Glorfindel (This is actually a change that Jackson made that I appreciate, putting Arwen in this spot instead), but I remember a weird scene where Aragorn and Gollum meet up on the river of Anduin after the hobbits are taken.
Anybody else have memories of it?